Selling Souls

Ethical Theory and the Commercialisation of Genetic Information
  • Martin Johnston


The prospect of an increasing range of genetic screening tests, with ever improving accuracy, raises numerous concerns. Whilst the scientific optimist may point to numerous advantages in terms of enhancing quality of life, reducing the incidence of serious genetic illnesses and the like, numerous writers (Post, 1992, Terrenoire, 1992, Chadwick, 1993, Boss, 1994, Hepburn, 1996) have pointed to a number of difficulties associated with such technologies. A key concern relates to the control of genetic information pertaining to a particular individual following such screening. Clearly it is not possible to deal with this concern in any complete sense in a paper of this size, nonetheless, by focusing on one particular issue-the use of genetic information by insurance companies—this paper aims to sketch the general territory in which discussion may prove most fruitful. It will be argued that by exploring the metaethical foundations of our concerns, we may go some way towards addressing the problems.


Genetic Information Genetic Screening Genetic Constitution Insurance Industry Moral Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blackburn, Simon (1984), Spreading the Word, Oxford University Press: OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Boss, Judith A. (1994), ‘First trimester prenatal diagnosis: earlier is not necessarily better’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.20,No.3, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  3. Darwall, Stephen, Gibbard, Alan and Railton, Peter (1992), ‘Toward Fin de siecle Ethics: Some Trends’, Philosophical Review, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  4. Chadwick, Ruth F. (1993), ‘What counts as success in genetic counselling?’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.19,No. 1, MarchGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibbard, Alan (1992), Wise Choices, Apt Feelings; A Theory of Normative Judgement, Oxford University Press: OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Hepburn, Elizabeth R. (1996), ‘Genetic testing and early diagnosis and intervention: boon or burden?’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.22,No.2, AprilGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoedemaekers, Rogeer, ten Have, Henck and Chadwick, Ruth (1997), ‘Genetic screening: a comparative analysis of three recent reports’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.23,No.3, JuneGoogle Scholar
  8. Ledley, Fred A. (1994), ‘Distinguishing genetics and eugenics on the basis of fairness’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.20,No.3, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  9. Nagel, Thomas (1986), The View From Nowhere, Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Post, Stephen G. (1992), ‘Huntington’s Disease: prenatal screening for late onset disease’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.18,No.2, JuneGoogle Scholar
  11. Putnam, Hilary (1992), Realism With a Human Face, Harvard University press: Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  12. Terrenoire, Gwen (1992), ‘Huntington’s Disease and the ethics of genetic prediction’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol.18,No.2, JuneGoogle Scholar
  13. Wittgenstien, Ludwig (1978), Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell: OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Johnston
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health StudiesUniversity of Central LancashireUK

Personalised recommendations