Advertisement

Genetic Testing and Adverse Selection in the Market for Life Insurance

Preliminary Findings for the BRCA1 Gene Mutation
  • Ken R. Smith
  • Cathleen D. Zick
  • Robert N. Mayer
  • Jeffrey R. Botkin

Abstract

The human genome project is rapidly fueling the development of genetic tests for inherited diseases. Over 100 different genetic tests are currently available for a wide range of diseases including Huntington disease, hypercholesterolemia, sickle-cell trait, and selected forms of Alzheimer’s disease, colon cancer, melanoma, breast and ovarian cancer. The U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment has projected that there will be a tenfold rise in the number of genetic tests that are available during the 1990s (U.S. Congressional..., 1988). Increasingly, a variety of public and private interest groups are raising questions about what individuals and society should do with such genetic information. Within the life and health insurance markets, ethical concerns regarding genetic discrimination are clashing with the underwriting needs of insurance companies.

Keywords

Ovarian Cancer Genetic Test Life Insurance Adverse Selection Genetic Test Result 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Council of Life Insurance (1994), ‘The need for genetic information in risk classification’, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Beliveau, B. (1984), ‘Theoretical and empirical aspects of implicit information in the market for life insurance’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 51, pp. 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billings, P.R. cited in Chase, D. (1992), ‘In the battle over genetic testing, critics must be reconed with’, Council Review, vol. 17:9–10.Google Scholar
  4. Botkin, J.R., Croyle, R.T., Smith, K.R., Baty B., Lerman C., Goldgar D., Ward, J., Flick, B., and Nash, J. (1996), ‘A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychological effects of BRCA1 testing’, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 88, pp. 872–882.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne, M.J. (1992), ‘Evidence of adverse selection in the individual health insurance market’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 59, pp. 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cawley J. and Philipson, T. (1996), ‘An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insuarnce’, working paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Council for Responsible Genetics (1995), Testimony to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Genetic Testing Working Group, March 12.Google Scholar
  8. Council of State Governments (1993), Advances in genetic information — A guide for state policy makers, Iron Works Pike: Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
  9. Croyle, R.T., Smith, K.R., Botkin, J.R., Baty, B., and Nash, J. (1997), ‘Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: Preliminary findings’, Health Psychology, Vol. 16, pp. 63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank, R.G. and McGuire, T.G. (1986), ‘Adverse selection in insurance markets: A selective survey’, in Dionne, G. (ed.), Contributions to Insurance Economics, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, pp. 97–140.Google Scholar
  11. Haney, D.Q. (1997), ‘Double mastectomy radical, effective’, Wisconsin State Journal, April 14, p. 1A.Google Scholar
  12. Lapham, E.V., Kozma, C., and Weiss, J.O. (1996) ‘Genetic discrimination: Perspectives of consumers’, Science, Vol. 274, pp. 621–624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marquis, M.S. and Phelps, C.E. (1987), ‘Price elasticity and adverse selection in the demand for supplementary health insurance’, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 25, pp. 299–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGoodwin, W. (1997), ‘Biotechnology and the consumer.’ Esther Peterson Consumer Policy Forum Speech at the American Council on Consumer Interests’ annual conference, April 5, and forthcoming in The Journal of Consumer Affairs.Google Scholar
  15. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (1996), Report of the Genetic Testing Working Group to the Life Insurance (A) Committee, June.Google Scholar
  16. Pauly, M.V. (1986), ‘Taxation, health insurance, and market failure in the medical economy’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 24, pp. 629–675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment (1988), Mapping our genes: How big, how fast? OTA-BA-373, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  18. Zick, CD. and Mayer, R.M. (1996), ‘Consumption in the land of milk and (home-baked) cookies’, in Heaton, T.B., Hirschl, T.A., and Chadwick, B. (eds.) Utah in the 1990s — A demographic perspective, Signature Books: Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken R. Smith
    • 1
  • Cathleen D. Zick
    • 1
  • Robert N. Mayer
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. Botkin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Family and Consumer StudiesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations