Abstract
There is little doubt that potential parents have always been concerned about the well-being of the foetus, their invisible baby-to-be. In the past reassurance, if it came, came only with birth. Prenatal testing techniques and genetic knowledge now provide the means to see the foetus and to test it for genetic disorders. It has been argued that 4the availability of foetal surveillance techniques has transformed the pregnancy experience from a developmental process and a miracle of nature to a risk-dominated and technology-guided event’ (Raines 1996). Rather than a transformation, however, it seems that awe continues to co-exist with varying degrees of agonizing in relation to calculated risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alderson P. (1991) ‘Abstract bioethics ignores human emotions’ Bulletin of Medical Ethics May pp. 13–21
Aristotle (1953) The Nicomachean Ethics, Penguin Books, London.
Bames G. & Bryan J. (1996) The Decision—Testing for Down’s Syndrome, Channel 4 Television, London.
Carey J.S. (1991) ‘I am not born yet-but that won’t stop me suing you’ New Statesman & Society No. 15, pp. 28–29
Carr D. (1991) Educating the Virtues—An essay on the philosophical psychology of moral development and education, Routledge, London.
Chadwick R. (Co-ordinator) (1997) Genetic Screening: Ethical and Philosophical Perspectives Euroscreen Final Report
Foot P. (1978) Virtues and Vices and other essays in Moral Philosophy Blackwell, Oxford.
Geach P. (1977) The Virtues—The Stanton Lectures 1973–4 Cambridge University Press.
Hursthouse R. (1987) Beginning Lives Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Johnstone M-J (1994) Bioethics—A Nursing Perspective Second Edition, W.B. Saunders/Bailliere Tindall, Sydney.
Jones S.L. (1996) ‘The At-Risk Health Status and Technology: a Diagnostic Invitation and the Gift of Knowing’ Social Science and Medicine Vol. 42,No. 11, pp. 1545–1553
Mennuti M. (1996) ‘A 35-Year Old Pregnant Woman Considering Maternal Screening and Amniocentesis ‘JAMA Vol. 275,No. 18 pp. 1440–1446.
Pembr ey M. (1997) The Progress Guide to Genetics The Progress Educational Trust
Penticuff J.H. (1996) ‘Ethical Dimensions in Genetic Screening: A Look into the Future’ JOGNN Vol. 25,No. 9, pp. 785–789
Rothblatt M. (1997) Unzipped Genes Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Raines D.A. (1996) ‘Fetal Surveillance: Issues and Implications’ JOGNN Vol. 25,No. 7, pp. 559–564
Scott P.A. (1995) ‘Aristotle, Nursing and Health Care Ethics’ Nursing Ethics Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 279–285.
Sellman D. (1997) ‘The Virtues in the Moral Education of Nurses: Florence Nightingale Revisited’ Nursing Ethics Vol. 4,No. 1, pp.2–11.
Shelp E.E. (ed.) (1985) Virtue & Medicine D. Reidel Publishing Company
Warnock M. (1985) A Question of Life—The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Basil Blackwell Ltd
Williams P. (1995) ‘Should We Prevent Down’s Syndrome?’ British Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol. 3, pp. 46–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gallagher, A. (1999). Negotiating the Dilemmas of Prenatal Testing for Genetic Disorders. In: Thompson, A.K., Chadwick, R.F. (eds) Genetic Information. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34586-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34586-4_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46052-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-34586-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive