Abstract
According to Jürgen Habermas, regulation of a society by “action norms” remains valid for those to whom they are addressed if they are a product of rational discourse within a pre-existing framework of private and public rights granted to an individual as a member of a socially determined association — the society of which the addressee is a member (Habermas, 1996, p. 107). This pre-existing framework places emphasis on rights in a broader sense than either the “liberal” tradition’s concept of human rights as the expression of moral self-determination or the idea of rights as the legal protection of the individual against institutions of the state. The basic requirement is the “right to the greatest possible measure of equal individual liberties” which can be achieved only with the associated rights of “status of member” and the political facility to exercise those rights, including “equal opportunities to participate in processes of opinion-and will-formation in which citizens exercise their political autonomy and through which they generate legitimate law. ” (Habermas, 1996, p. 122–3).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, W.F., (1989) ‘Human Gene Therapy: Why draw a line?, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14, 681–693.
Beckwith, J. (1991), ‘Foreword: The Human Genome Initiative: Genetics’ Lighning Rod’, American Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. XVII.No. 1–2.
Council of Europe: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaty Series 164, Oviedo, 4.IV.1997.
Davis et al (1990), ‘The Human Genome and Other Initiatives’, 249 Science 342, 342.
Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (GTAC), (1997) Third Annual Report, Health Department of the UK.
Habermas, J (1981) The Theory of Communicative Action (trans. Thomas McCarthy, 2 vols, Boston: Beacon, 1984, 1987).
Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Blackwell, Oxford. (Translated by William Rehg).
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (1990 c.37).
Kennedy & Grubb, (1994) Medical Law: text with materials, 2ed. Butterworths, London.
Lippman, A (1991), ‘Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequities’, American Journal of Law & Medicine, Vol. XVII. No. 1 & 2, p. 15–50.
Report of the Committee on the Ethics of Gene Therapy, Cm. 1788, (1992) HMSO, London, (The Clothier Report).
Royal College of Physicians, (1990a) Research Involving Patients. A Working Party Report, London.
Royal College of Physicians. (1990b) Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Research Involving Human Subjects, 2ed London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dziobon, S. (1999). Germ-Line Gene Therapy. In: Thompson, A.K., Chadwick, R.F. (eds) Genetic Information. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34586-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34586-4_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46052-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-34586-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive