Skip to main content

Can We Learn From Eugenics?

  • Chapter

Abstract

The word “eugenics” may be unfamiliar to most people today, but for a period of about sixty-five years, roughly 1880 to 1945, both that term and the theories of human “improvement” which it denotes were in wide currency. Francis Galton, a cousin of Darwin, invented the term and launched a movement to improve the human race, or at least to halt its perceived decline, through selective breeding. His ideas spread quickly, and by the 1920s eugenics movements existed all over the world. Eugenics, a movement for social betterment clothed in the mantle of modern science, claimed the allegiance of most genetic scientists and drew supporters from political right, left, and center. Unfortunately for that movement, and indeed for much of mankind, eugenics was embraced by Hitler and his Nazi followers, tarnishing its name forever. After the fall of the Third Reich, eugenic ideas quickly lost their cachet, becoming virtually taboo in the United States and Europe, where the term “eugenic” is now used primarily as an epithet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aly, Gotz; Chroust, Peter; and Pross, Christian (1994), Cleansing the Fatherland: Nazi Medicine and Racial Hygiene, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, Tim (1997), ‘China Syndrome: Chinas eugenics law makes trouble for science and business’, Scientific American, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broberg, Gunnar, and Roll-Hansen, Nils (1996), Eugenics and the Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleigh, Michael, and Wippermann, Wolfgang (1991), The Racial State: Germany 1933—1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Chee Khoon, and Chee, Heng Leng (1984), ‘Singapore 1984: Breeding for Big Brother’, in Chee, Heng Leng and Chan, Chee Khoon (eds.), Designer Genes: I.Q., Ideology, and Biology, Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Social Analysis, pp. 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Charles (1922), ‘The Eugenics Programme and Progress in its Achievement’, In Aldrich, Moron A., et al (eds.), Eugenics: Twelve University Lectures, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong-Sheng. Sun (1981), ‘Popularizing the Knowledge of Eugenics and Advocating Optimal Births Vigorously’, Renkou Yanjiu (Population Research)(Beijing), No. 4, pp. 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duster, Troy (1990), Backdoor to Eugenics, New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Francis (1883), Inquires into Human Faculty and Its Development. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, Richard J., and Murray, Charles (1994), The Bell Curve, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1927), Opinion in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 205, 207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamrat-Lang, Debora (1995), ‘Healing Society: Medical Language in American Eugenics’, Science in Context, Vol. 8.No. l, pp. 175–196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. (1985), In the Name of Eugenics. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, Stefan (1994), The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and National Socialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Donald (1976), ‘Eugenics in Britain’, Social Studies of Science 6, pp. 499–532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Pauline M. H. (1992), Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, its Sources and its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature (1994), ‘China’s Misconception of Eugenics (editorial)’, Nature, Vol. 6. January, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek (1984), Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Diane B. (1991), ‘The Rockefeller Foundation and the Origins of Behavior Genetics.’ In The Expansion of American Biology, Benson, K., et al. (eds.), New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press (1995), Controlling Human Heredity, New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernick, Martin (1996), The Black Stork, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, Robert (1988), Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, Nicole H. (1988), White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies 1877–1919, Boston: Northeastern University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, Philip R. (1991), The Surgical Solution: A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the United State, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils (1989), ‘Eugenic Movement in Scandinavia’, Brit. J. Hist. Sci, Vol. 22, pp. 335–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, William (1990), ‘The Eugenics Movement in France, 1890–1940’, In Adams, Mark (ed.), The Weil-Born Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Nancy L. (1991), The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender and Nation in Latin America, Ithaca: Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachbroit, Robert (1987), ‘What is Wrong with Eugenics?’, QQ: Report from the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, Vol. 7.No. 2–3, pp. 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, James (1997), Genes and Politics: Presidential Address. Annual Report 1996: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor (New York): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, Paul (1989), Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism 1870–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Sheila (1987), ‘The Race Hygiene Movement in Germany’, Osiris, Vol. 3, pp. 193–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, Dorothy (1996), ‘Eugenics: Alive and Well in China’, The Gene Letter, Vol. 1.No. 1, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikler, Daniel and Barondess, Jeremiah (1993), ‘Bioethics and anti-Bioethics in Germany: What Must We Remember?’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Vol. 3.No. 1, pp.39–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wikler, D. (1999). Can We Learn From Eugenics?. In: Thompson, A.K., Chadwick, R.F. (eds) Genetic Information. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34586-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34586-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46052-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-34586-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics