Skip to main content

The Psychology of Experts An Alternative View

  • Chapter
Expertise and Decision Support

Abstract

These quotes illustrate two facts: First, the topic of experts and expertise is of interest to many writers, both in literature and in science. Second, these writers disagree about the value of advice from experts. The goal of this paper is to explore the issue of expertise from a psychological perspective and to use that perspective to provide insights into the differing views of experts.

The research described in this chapter was supported in part by grants from the Army Research Institute, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Bureau of General Research at Kansas State University. This chapter was prepared while the author was serving as Director of the Decision, Risk, and Management Science Program at the National Science Foundation. Copies of cited research available from author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1981). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. L., & Beerel, A. C. (1988). Expert systems in business: A practical approach. Chichester: Ellis Horwood (Halsted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., & Payne, J. W. (1976). The psychology of parole decision process: A joint application of attribution theory and information-processing psychology. In J. S. Carroll & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebrzynski, G. (1987, February 27). Experts systems are seen as replacements for humans. Marketing News, 21(5), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. (1982). Expert judgments made under uncertainty: Some evidence and suggestions. Social Science Quarterly, 63, 428–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J., & Beach, L. R. (1984). The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision making literature. American Psychologist, 39, 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, M. J. (1984). Developments in expert systems. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • deGroot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dino, G. A., & Shanteau, J. (1984). What skills do managers consider important for effective decision making? Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society meeting, San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, E., & Konecni, V. (1975). Decision making and information integration in the courts: The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1986). On cognitive illusions and their implications. Southern California Law Review, 59(2), 401–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. (1974). Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 562–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettenson, R., Shanteau, J., & Krogstad, J. (1987). Expert judgment: Is more information better? Psychological Reports, 60, 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, J. E., Wright, W. R., & Coles, R. H. (1975). Testing the accuracy of field textures. Soil Science Society of American Proceedings, 39, 800–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaeth, G. J. (1980). A comparison of lecture and interactive training designed to reduce the influence of interfering materials: An application to soil science. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Kansas State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaeth, G. J., & Shanteau, J. (1979). Analysis of the Soil Survey Laboratory data and description for some soils of Kansas: Validity of the soil texture-classifications. (Tech. Rep. 79-11). Kansas State University, Department of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaeth, G. J., & Shanteau, J. (1984). Reducing the influence of irrelevant information on experienced decision makers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, P. C., & Edwards, W. (1975). Public values: Multi-attribute utility measurement in social decision making. In, M. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday-Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, R. A. (1970). Can you be sure of your experts? N.Y.: Award Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graubard, S. R. (Ed.). (1988). The artificial intelligence debate: False starts, real foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, M. (1984, January). Playing by the rules. PC World, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R. (1987, Summer). The problem of extracting the knowledge of experts from the perspective of experimental psychology. Al Magazine, 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, H. D. (1917). An interesting corn seed experiment. The Iowa Agriculturalist, 17, 424–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1984). Towards an understanding of the role of experience in the evolution from novice to expert. Developments in Expert Systems, 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstad, J. L., Ettenson, R. T., & Shanteau, J. (1984). Context and experience in auditor’s materiality judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 4, 54–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. H. (1979). Information processing and science instruction. In J. Lochhead & J. Clement (Eds.), Cognitive process instruction. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335–1342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, D. (1982). Introductory readings in expert systems. New York: Gordon & Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. H., & Winkler, R. L. (1977). Can weather forecasters formulate reliable forecasts of precipitation and temperature? National Weather Digest, 2, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, G. F. (1981). How are personnel selection decisions made? An analysis of decision strategies in a simulated personnel selection task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, C. (1987). Build your own expert system. (2nd ed.). New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, S. (1962). The relationship of clinical experience and training methods to several criteria of clinical prediction. Psychological Monographs, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. H. (1977). Expert livestock judgment: A descriptive analysis of the development of expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. H., & Shanteau, J. (1978). Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, F. (1988, August 12). Thinking machine: An “electronic clone” of a skilled engineer is very hard to create. The Wall Street Journal, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. (1984). Some unasked questions about the psychology of expert decision makers. In M. E. El-Hawary (Ed.), Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. New York: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. (1987). Psychological characteristics of expert decision makers. In J. L. Mumpower, O. Renn, L. D. Phillips, & V. R. R. Uppuluri (Eds.), Expert judgment and expert systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. (1989). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. In B. Rohrmann, L. R. Beach, C. Vlek, & S. R. Watson (Eds.), Advances in decision research. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. & Dino, G. A. (in press). Environmental stress effects on creativity and decision making. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Decision making under stress. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., & Gaeth, G. J. (1981). Evaluation of the field method of soil texture classification: A psychological analysis of accuracy and consistency. (Tech. Rep. 79-1). Kansas State University, Department of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., Grier, M., Johnson, J., & Bemer, E. (1991). Teaching decision making skills to student nurses. In J. Baron & R. V. Brown (Eds.), Teaching decision making to adolescents. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., & Nagy, G. F. (1984). Information integration in person perception: Theory and application. In M. Cook (Ed.), Issues in person perception. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., & Phelps, R. H. (1977). Judgment and swine: Approaches and issues in applied judgment analysis. In M. F. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes in applied settings. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatter, P. E. (1987). Building expert systems: Cognitive emulation. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Regulation of risk: A psychological perspective. In R. Noll (Ed.), Social science and regulatory policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1990). Revision, weighting, and commitment in consensus group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Laboratory. (1966). Soil survey data and descriptions for some soils of Kansas. (Soil Survey Investigation Report 4). Washington, D.C.: USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo, D., Adams, C., Milner, M., & Schipper, L. (1962). Reliability and accuracy in the inspection of hard red winter wheat. Cereal Science Today, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. A. (1923). What is in the corn judge’s mind? Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 15, 300–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, T. (1979). The right stuff. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, C., & Janos, L. (1985). Yeager: An autobiography. Toronto: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shanteau, J. (1992). The Psychology of Experts An Alternative View. In: Wright, G., Bolger, F. (eds) Expertise and Decision Support. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34290-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34290-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-43862-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-34290-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics