Play Fighting and Real Fighting
Rough-and-tumble play (R&T) is a distinctive form of behaviour, prominent in children. It has been studied by a variety of methods which complement each other in interesting ways.
Although superficially similar to real fighting, play fighting is distinct from it, and there are recognised cues which can be used in telling these two behaviours apart. These have been discerned by observational studies, and children too can verbalise many of these cues.
Play fighting is much more frequent than real fighting, in playgrounds. A proportion of play fighting can, however, turn into real fighting. The most usual reason, at least in middle childhood, appears to relate to ‘honest mistakes’ or accidental injury. However in some children, and more frequently by early adolescence, R&T may be used more deliberately as a social tool, consistent with a ‘cheating’ hypothesis.
Teachers make somewhat biased judgments about the relative frequency of play fighting and real fighting, and how often play fighting becomes real; possibly basing their perceptions on the small number of more aggressive children they may come into contact with in a disciplinary way.
Views on the functions of R&T may need modification. Social bonding and social skills may be incidental benefits of R&T, but fail to explain its distinctive features or the sex differences. Practice in fighting/hunting skills is a functional hypothesis consistent with design features and sex differences, but lacks direct support. The age changes and existence of ‘cheating’ suggest that, at least for some children and many adolescents, R&T can be used as a social tool in establishing or maintaining dominance in peer groups. The technique of interviewing participants in play fighting appears to have promise for further work in this area.
KeywordsSocial Skill Middle Childhood Primary School Teacher Aggressive Child Accidental Injury
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aldis, O. (1975). Play fighting. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Asher, S.R. & Coie, J.D. (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Blatchford, P. (1989). Playtime in the primary school. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
- Blurton Jones, N. (1967). An ethological study of some aspects of social behaviour of children in nursery school. In D. Morris (Ed.), Primate ethology (pp.347–368). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
- Boulton, M.J. (1992b). Participation in playground activities at middle school. Educational Research, 34, 167–182.Google Scholar
- Boulton, M.J. (1993a). Children’s abilities to distinguish between playful and aggressive fighting: A developmental perspective. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 249–263.Google Scholar
- Boulton, M.J. & Smith, P.K. (submitted). Peer social status, rough-and-tumble play and aggression: social skill and behaviour. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Carson, J., Burks, V. & Parke, R.D. (1993). Parent-child physical play: Determinants and consequences. In K. MacDonald (Ed.), Parent-child play (pp. 197–220). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Fagen, R. M. (1981). Animal play behavior. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Fassnacht, G. (1982). Theory and practice of observing behaviour. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Finnan, C. R. (1982). The ethnography of children’s spontaneous play. In G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling (pp.358–380). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Groos, K. (1901). The play of man. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Ladd, G. (1983). Social networks of popular, average and rejected children in a school setting. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 283–307.Google Scholar
- Oswald, H., Krappmann, L., Chowduri, F. & von Salisch, M. (1987). Gaps and bridges: Interactions between girls and boys in elementary school. Sociological Studies of Child Development, 2, 205–223.Google Scholar
- Pellegrini, A.D. (1994). The rough play of adolescent boys of differing sociometric status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 525–540.Google Scholar
- Pellegrini, A.D. & Smith, P.K. (submitted). Physical activity play: The nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Power, T. G. and Parke, R. D. (1981). Play as a context for early learning. In L. M. Laosa & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Families as learning environments for children (pp. 147–178). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Schåfer, M. & Smith, P.K. (1996). Teachers’ perceptions of play fighting and real fighting in primary school. Educational Research, 38, 173–181.Google Scholar
- Sluckin, A.M. (1981). Growing up in the playground: The social development of children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Smith, P.K. (1973). Temporal clusters and individual differences in the behaviour of pre-school children. In R. P. Michael & J. H. Crook (eds), Comparative Ecology and Behaviour of Primates, (pp751–798). London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, P. K. (1982). Does play matter? Functional and evolutionary aspects of animal and human play. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 139–184.Google Scholar
- Smith, P.K. (1989). The role of rough-and-tumble play in the development of social competence: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In B.H. Schneider, G. Attili, J. Nadel & R.P. Weissberg (Eds.), Social competence in developmental perspective (pp.239–255). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Smith, P.K. & Connolly, K. (1972). Patterns of play and social interaction in pre-school children. In N.G. Blurton Jones (Ed.), Ethological studies of child behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1978). Play and aggression: A study of rhesus monkeys. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Thorne, B. (1986). Girls and boys together but mostly apart: Gender arrangements in elementary schools. In W. W. Hartup & Z. Rubin (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 167–184). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar