The Role of Natural Gas in Electric Power Generation in the Twenty-First Century

  • Steven I. Freedman


Industrial society is energy, capital and information intensive. As a nation makes the transition to an industrial society, the degree of electrification in terms of the electricity share of point-of-use energy consumption increases as does the electric intensity of GDP and the electricity consumption per capita. A substantial number of lesser developed nations are rapidly expanding their economies and consequently their power generation capacities. As these developing economies expand, the environmental consequences of their primary energy choice will have profound effects due to the implicit long term commitment to specific technologies. In the industrialized world we are realizing the extent to which technology choices have extremely large inertia’s. Historically, coal was the low cost energy resource because of the ease of discovery, simplicity of mining and the availability of low cost labor in societies undergoing industrialization. While coal is less expensive than natural gas on an energy basis, the recent emergence of low cost high efficiency gas turbine combined cycle equipment, combined with increased discoveries of modest cost gas worldwide, results in natural gas combined cycle produced electricity being the lowest cost power in many locales, besides being by far the cleanest of the fuel fired alternatives.


Coal Gasification Combine Cycle Modular Generation Combine Cycle Power Plant Combine Cycle Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    International Energy Annual 1993, DOE/EIA-0219 (93), U. S. Department of Energy, Washington, May 1995Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holtberg, Paul D., et al., Baseline Projection Data Book; 1996, GRI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett, Porter, Natural Gas Supply & Delivery: Long Term Contracts at Competitive Prices are Available, Blast Furance Gas Injection Workshop, Gas Research Institute, October 19, 1995Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woods, Thomas J., Technologies and Improved Strategies Have Lowered Finding Costs and Opened New Exploration Opportunities, Gas Issues and Trends, Gas Research Institute, Washington, August 1995Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hodges, Carroll Ann, Mineral Resources, Environmental Issues and Land Use, Science, Vol 268, Page 1305, June 2, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pratt, Wallace E., Toward a Philosophy of Oil-Finding, Bulleting of American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Page 2231, December 1952Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hubbert, M. King, The Energy Resources of Earth, Scientific American, Page 31, September 1971Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanley, John M., Comparison of Estimates of Ultimately Recoverable Natural Gas in the United States Gas Resource Studies No. 1., Colorado School of Mines, April 1977Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Todd, Douglas M., and Joiner, James R., IGCC Cost Study, EPRI Thirteenth Conference on Gasification Power Plants, San Francisco, October 19–21, 1994Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simbeck, Dale, Air-Blown Versus Oxygen-Blown Gasification, Gasification: An Alternative to Natural Gas, Institution of Chemical Engineers, London, November 22, 1995Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Conference on Economics and Politics of Energy, Miami, Beach, November 27–29, 1995Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven I. Freedman
    • 1
  1. 1.Gas Research InstituteChicago

Personalised recommendations