Advertisement

Host Response to Introduction of Antagonistic Yeasts Used for Control of Postharvest Decay

  • Samir Droby
  • Edo Chalutz
  • Michael E. Wisniewski
  • Charles L. Wilson

Abstract

Increasing public concern about the extensive use of synthetic chemicals for the control of plant diseases has led to intensified research efforts world-wide to develop alternative control methods that are safe for humans and the environment. Following the realisation of the risks involved in long term use of pesticides in agriculture, many countries have adapted a policy aimed at minimising the use of synthetic chemical pesticides by establishing vigorous research programs aimed at the development of environmentally sound control measures.

Keywords

Biological Control Citrus Fruit Surface Wound Fruit Surface Biocontrol Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, J.H. 1982, Effects of pesticides on non-target microorganisms on leaves, pp. 283–304, In: Blakeman, J.P. (ed.) Microbial Ecology of the Phylloplane, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, J.H. 1990, Biological control in the phyllosphere-realistic goal or false hope? Can. J. Plant Pathol. 12:300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, J.H. 1992, Biological control in the phyllosphere. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 30:603–635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, J.H. and Kenerley, C.M. 1987, The effect of a pesticide program on non-target epiphytic microbial population of apple leaves. Can. J. Microbiol. 24:1058–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avrahm, A. 1994, Isolation and Biochemical Characterization of Exo-β-(1–3)-glucanase from Pichia guilliermondii. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Arie, R., Droby, S., Zutkhi, J., Cohen, L., Weiss, B., Sarig, P., Zeidman, M., Daus, A., and Chalutz, E. 1991, Preharvest and postharvest biocontrol of Rhizopus rot of table grapes with yeasts. Proc. Int. Workshop Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables., Shepardstown, WV, USA. USDA-ARS Pub. 92:100–113.Google Scholar
  7. Blakeman, J.P. and Fokkema, N.J. 1982, Potential for biological control of plant diseases on the phylloplane. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 20: 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodie, I.D.S. and Blakeman, J.P. 1976, Competition for exogenous substrates in vitro by leaf surface microorganisms and germinating conidia of Botrytis cinerea. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 9:227–239.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, G.E., 1989, Host defenses at the wound site on harvested crops. Phytopathology 79:1381–1384.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, G.E., Barmore, C.R. 1983, Resistance of healed citrus exocarp to penetration by Penicillium digitatum. Phytopathology 73:691–694.Google Scholar
  11. Chalutz, E., Droby, S. and Wilson, C.L. 1988, Microbial protection against postharvest diseases of citrus fruit. Phytoparasitica 16: 195–196.Google Scholar
  12. Chalutz, E. and Wilson, C.L. 1990, Postharvest biocontrol of green and blue mold and sour rot of citrus by Debaryomyces hansenii. Plant Dis. 74:134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chalutz, E., DeVay, J.E. and Maxie, E.C. 1969, Ethylene induced isocoumarin formation in carrot root tissue. Plant Physiol. 44:235–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, R.S., Brougton, M.J., Cannon, R.D., Carne, A., Emerson, G.W. and Sullivan, P.A. 1993, An exo-β-(1–3)-glucanase of Candida albicans: purification of the enzyme and molecular cloning of the gene. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:325–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Davenport, R.R. 1976, Distribution of yeasts and yeast-like organisms from aerial surfaces of developing apples and grapes. pp. 325–359 In: Dickinson, C.H. and Preece, T.F. (eds.) Microbiology of Aerial Plant Surfaces. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  16. Dennis, C. 1975, Effect of pre-harvest fungicides on spoilage of soft fruit after harvest. Ann. Applied Biol. 81:227–234.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, R.A. and Harrison, M.J. 1990, Activation, structure and organization of genes involved in microbial defense in plants. Adv. Genetics 28:165–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Droby, S., Chalupovicz, L., Chalutz, E., Wisniewski, M.E. and Wilson, C.L. 1995a, Inhibitory activity of yeast cell wall materials against postharvest fungal pathogens. Phytopathology (abstract, in press)Google Scholar
  19. Droby, S. and Chalutz, E. 1994a, Successful biocontrol of postharvest pathogens of fruits and vegetables. Proc. Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Pests and Diseases 1994:1265–1272.Google Scholar
  20. Droby, S., Chalutz, E., Cohen, L., Weiss, B. and Wilson C.L. 1991a, Nutrition competition as a mechanism of action of biological control agents of postharevst diseases. Proc. Int. Workshop on Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables. Shepherdstown, WV, Sept. 1990. USDA-ARS Publication 92: 142–160Google Scholar
  21. Droby, S. and Chalutz, E. 1994b, Mode of action of biocontrol agents for postharvest diseases. pp. 63–75 In: Wilson, C. L. and Wisniewski, M.E. (eds.) Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables-Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton Fla.Google Scholar
  22. Droby, S., Chalutz, E., Horev, B., Cohen L., Gaba, V., Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. 1993a, Factors affecting UV-induced resistance in grapefruit against the green mould decay caused by Penicillium digitatum. Plant Pathol. 42:418–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Droby, S., Chalutz, E. and Wilson, C.L. 1991b, Antagonistic microorganisms as biological control agents of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest News and Information 2: 169–173.Google Scholar
  24. Droby, S., Chalutz, E., Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. 1989, Characterization of the biocontrol activity of Debaryomyces hansenii in the control of Penicillium digitatum on grapefruit. Can. J. Microbiol. 35: 794–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Droby, S., Chalutz, E., Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. 1993b, Biological control of postharvest diseases: A promising alternative to the use of synthetic fungicides. Phytoparasitica 20: 149–153.Google Scholar
  26. Droby, S., Hofstein, R., Wilson, C.L., Wisniewski, M., Fridlender, B., Cohen, L., Weiss, B., Daus, A., Timar, D. and Chalutz, E. 1993c, Pilot testing of Pichia guilliermondii: A biocontrol agent of postharvest diseases of citrus fruit. Biological Contol. 3:47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Droby, S., Lischinsky, S., Cohen, L., Manulis, S., Mehra, R.K. and Eckert, J.W. 1995b, Epiphytic yeasts of citrus fruit tolerant to extreme conditions are effective antagonists of green mild decay. Phytopathology (abstract, in press).Google Scholar
  28. Droby, S., Robin, D., Chalutz, E. and Chet, I. 1993d, Possible role of glucanase and extracellular polymers in the mode of action of yeast antagonists of postharvest diseases. Phytoparasitica 2:167.Google Scholar
  29. Eckert, J.W. 1991, Role of chemical fungicides and biological agents in postharvest disease control. Proc. Int. Workshop Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables., Shepardstown, WV, USA. USDA-ARS Publication. 92:14–30Google Scholar
  30. Eckert, J.W. and Ogawa, J.M. 1985, The chemical control of postharvest diseases: subtropical and tropical fruits. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 23: 421–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eckert, J.W. and Ogawa, J.M. 1988, The chemical control of postharvest diseases: Deciduous fruits, berries, vegetables and root/tuber crops. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 26:433–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elad, Y., Chet, I., Boyle, P. and Henis, Y. 1983, Parasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii — scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology 73:85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fokkema, N.J. 1992, The phyllosphere as an ecological neglected milieu: A plant pathologist’s point of view. pp. 3–18 In: Andrews, J.H. and Hirano, S.S.(eds.) Microbial Ecology of Leaves. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Fokkema, N.J. and Van den Heuvel, J. 1986, Microbiology of the Phyllosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Fokkema, N.J. 1981, Fungal leaf saprophytes, beneficial or detrimental? pp. 433–454 In: Blakeman, J.P. (ed.), Microbial Ecology of the Phylloplane. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  36. Gullino, M.L., Aloi, C., Palitto, M., Benzi, D. and Garibaldi, A. 1991, Attempts at biocontrol of postharvest diseases of apple. Med. Fac. Landbouw. Rijksuiv. Gent. 56: 195.Google Scholar
  37. Hahlbrock, K. and Scheel, D. 1989, Physiology and molecular biology of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 347–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hammerschmidt, R. 1984, Rapid deposition of lignin in potato tuber tissue as a response to fungi non-pathogenic on potato. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 24:33–42.Google Scholar
  39. Hammerschmidt, R. and Lamport, D.T.A., Muldoon, E.P. 1984, Cell wall hydroxyproline enhancement and lignin deposition as an early event in the resistance of cucumber to Cladosporium cucumerinum. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 24:43–47.Google Scholar
  40. Heupel, C., Schlochtermeier, A and Schrempf, H. 1993, Characterization of an intercellular β-glucosidase from Streptomyces reticuli. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 15: 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Janisiewicz, W.J. 1988, Biological control of diseases of fruit, pp. 153–165, In: Mukergi, K.G. and Grag, K.L. (eds.) Biocontrol of Plant Diseases. vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  42. Janisiewicz, W. and., Roitman, J. 1988, Biological control of blue mold and gray mold on apple and pear with Pseudomonas cepacia. Phytopathology 78:1697–1700.Google Scholar
  43. Janisiewicz, W.J., Peterson, D.L. and Bors, R. 1994, Control of storage decay of apples with Sporobolomyces roseus. Plant Dis. 78:466–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jeffries, P. and Jeger, M.J. 1990, The biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit. Postharvest News and Information 1:365–368.Google Scholar
  45. Jordan, V.W.L. 1973, The effects of prophylactic spray programs on the control of pre-and postharvest diseases of strawberry. Plant Pathol. 22:67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kable, P.F. 1971, Significance of short-term latent infections in the control of brown rot in peach fruits. Phytopathol. Z. 70:173.Google Scholar
  47. Koomen, I. and Jeffries, P. 1993, Effect of antagonistic microorganisms on the postharvest development of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on mango. Plant Pathol. 42: 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Korsten, L., Villiers, E.E., Jager, E.S., Cook, N. and Kotze, J.M. 1991, Biological control of avocado postharvest diseases. South African Avocado Growers’s Association Yearbook 14: 57–59.Google Scholar
  49. Kuc, J. and Strobel, N.E. 1992, Induced resistance using pathogens and nonpathogenic. pp. 295–303 In: Tjamos, E.C, Papavizas, G.C. and Cook, R.J.(eds.), Biological Control of Plant Diseases — Progress and Challenges for the Future. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Kuc, J. 1990. Immunization for the control of plant diseases. pp. 355–373, In: Hornby, D.(ed.), Biological Control of Soil-borne Plant Pathogens. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  51. Laville, E. 1971, Evolution des pourritures d’entreposage des argrumes avec l’ utilisation de nouveaux fongicides de traitement apres recolte. Fruits 26:301–304.Google Scholar
  52. Lurie, S., Droby, S., Chalupowicz, L. and Chalutz, E. 1995, Efficacy of Candida oleophila strain 182 in preventing Penicillium expansum infection of nectarine fruits. Phytoparasitica 23:231–234.Google Scholar
  53. Mercier, J., Arul, J., Ponnampalam, R. and Boulet, M. 1993, Induction of 6-methoxymellein and resistance to storage pathogens in carrot slices by UV-C. J. Phytopathol. 137:44–55.Google Scholar
  54. Mercier, J. and Wilson, C.L. 1994, Colonization of apple wounds by naturally occurring microflora and introduced Candida oleophila and their effect on infection by Botrytis cinerea during storage. Biol. Con. 4:138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morris, C.E. and Rouse, D.I. 1985, Role of nutrients in regulating epiphytic bacterial populations. pp. 63–83, In: Windels, E.E. and Lindow, S.E. (eds.), Biological Control on the Phylloplane, American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  56. National Research Council, Board of Agriculture 1993, Pesticide in the diets of infants and children. National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  57. Piston, S.M., Seviour, R.J. and McDougall, B.M. 1993, Noncellolytic fungal β-glucanases: Their physiology and regulation. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 15:178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roberts, R.G. 1990a, Biological control of gray mold of apple by Cryptococcus laurentii. Phytopathology 80:526–530.Google Scholar
  59. Roberts, R.G. 1990b, Biological control of mucor rot of pear by Cryptococcus laurentii, C. flavus and C. albidus. Phytopathology 80: 1051.Google Scholar
  60. Rodov, V., Ben-Yehoshua, S., D’hallewin, G., Castia, T. and Farg, D. 1994, Accumulation of phytoalexins scoparone and scopoletin in citrus fruit subjected to various postharvest treatments. Acta Hort. 381:517–523.Google Scholar
  61. Sequeira, L. 1990, Induced resistance: Physiology and Biochemistry. pp. 663–678 In: Baker, R.R. and Dunn, P.E. (eds.) New Directions in Biological Control: Alternatives for Suppressing Agricultural Pests and Diseases. Wiley-Liss Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
  62. Shefelbine, P.A. and Roberts, R.G. 1990, Population dynamics of Cryptococcus laurentii in wounds in apple and pear fruit stored under ambient or controlled atmospheric conditions. Phytopathology 80:1020.Google Scholar
  63. Shoseyov, O., Bravdo, B., Ikan R. and Chet, I. 1988, Endo β-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger grown on glycoside-containing medium. Phytochem.istry 27:1973–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smilanick, J.L. and Dennis-Arrue, R. 1992, Control of green mold of lemons with Pseudomonas species. Plant Dis. 76:481–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smilanick, J.L., Denis-Arrue, R., Bosch, J.R., Gonzales, A.R., Henson, D.J. and Janisiewicz, W.J. 1993, Biocontrol of postharvest brown rot of nectarines and peaches by Pseudomonas species. Crop Protec. 12:513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Snowdon, A.L. 1990, A Color Atlas of Post-Harvest Diseases and Disorders of Fruits and Vegetables, vol. 1 and 22, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  67. Sommer, N.E. 1985, Strategies for control of postharvest diseases of selected commodities, pp. 83–99 IN: Kader, A.A., Kasmire, R.F., Mitchel, G.F., Reid, M.S., Sommer, N.F. and Thompson, J.F. (eds), Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. Cooperative Extension, University of California, Davis, USA.Google Scholar
  68. Sommer, N.F. 1982, Postharvest handling practices and postharvest disease of fruit. Plant Dis. 66:357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spalding, D.H. 1970, Postharvest use of benomyl and thiabendazole to control blue-mold rot development in pears. Plant Dis. Rep. 54:655–656.Google Scholar
  70. Stretch, A.W. 1989, Biological control of blueberry and cranberry fruit rots (Vaccinium corymbosu L. and Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.). Acta Hort. 241:301–306.Google Scholar
  71. Tronsmo, A. and Hoftun, H. 1984, Storage and distribution of carrots. Effect on quality of long term storage in ice bank cooler and cold room and of different packing materials during distribution. Acta Hort. 163: 143–150.Google Scholar
  72. Turner, S.M., Newmank, E.I. and Campbell, R., 1985, Microbial population of ryegrass root surfaces: Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus supply. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17: 711–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Upstone, M. 1977, Evaluation of chemicals for control of Phytophthora fruit rot in stored apples. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Pest Dis. 1: 203.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, J.G.K., Kubelik, A.R., Livak, K.J., Rafalski, J.A. and Tingey, S.V. 1990, DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 6531–6535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilson, C.L. 1989, Managing the microflora of harvested fruits and vegetables to enhance resistance. Phytopathology 79: 1387–1390.Google Scholar
  76. Wilson, C.L. 1989, Managing the microflora of harvested fruits and vegetables to enhance resistance. Phytopathology 79: 1387–1390.Google Scholar
  77. Wilson, C.L. and Chalutz, E. 1989, Postharvest biological control of Penicillium rots of citrus with antagonistic yeasts and bacteria. Sci. Hort. 40:105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson, C.L. and El-Ghaouth, A. 1993, Multifaceted biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. pp. 181–185, In: Lumsden, R.D. and Vaughn, J.L. (eds.), Pest Management: Biologically Based Technologies. American Chemical Society Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  79. Wilson, C.L., El-Ghaouth, A., Chalutz, E., Droby, S., Stevens, C., Lu, J.Y., Khan, V. and Arul, J. 1994, Potential of induced resistance to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Plant Dis. 78:837–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilson, C.L. and Pusey, P.L. 1985, Potential for biological control of postharvest plant diseases. Plant Dis. 69:375–378.Google Scholar
  81. Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. 1989, Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: An emerging technology. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27:425–441.Google Scholar
  82. Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. 1994, Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables — Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  83. Wilson, C.L., Wisniewski, M.E., Biles, C.L., McLaughlin, R., Chalutz, E. and Droby, S. 1991, Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: alternatives to synthetic fungicides. Crop Protec. 10: 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilson, C.L., Wisniewski, M.E., Droby, S. and Chalutz, E. 1993, A selection strategy for microbial antagonists to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Sci. Hort. 40:105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wisniewski, M.E., Biles, C., Droby, S., McLaughlin, R., Wilson, C. and Chalutz, E. 1991, Mode of action of the postharvest biocontrol yeast, Pichia guilliermondii. I. Characterization of the attachment to Botrytis cinerea. Physiol. and Mol. Plant Pathol. 39: 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wisniewski, M.E. and Wilson, C.L. 1992, Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: Recent advances. HortSci. 27:94–98.Google Scholar
  87. Wisniewski, M.E. and Wilson, C.L. and Chalutz, E. 1988, Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit: Inhibition of Botrytis rot on apple by an antagonistic yeast. Proc. Ann. Mtg. Electron Microsc. Soc. Am. 46:290–291.Google Scholar
  88. Wisniewski, M.E., Wilson, C. and Hershberger, W. 1989, Characterization of inhibition of Rhizopus stolonifer germination and growth by Enterobacter cloacae. Can. J. Bot. 67:2317–2323.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samir Droby
    • 1
  • Edo Chalutz
    • 1
  • Michael E. Wisniewski
    • 2
  • Charles L. Wilson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department Postharvest Science Institute for Technology and StorageARO, The Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael
  2. 2.USDA ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research StationKearneysville

Personalised recommendations