Importance of Community Relationships in Biodiversity

  • Hiroya Kawanabe


It is well known, even by the general public, that there are many levels of biodiversity, such as the gene, species, higher taxa, and the ecosystem or landscape. All are important and significant components of biodiversity: i.e., the diversity of living materials or of ‘creatures’ themselves.


Success Ratio Community Relationship Living Material Ecological Complexity Hunting Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bruin, J., Sabelis, M. W., Takabayashi, J. and Dicke, M., 1991. Uninfested plants profit from their infested neighbours. Proc. Exper. and Appl. Entomol., N. E. V. Amsterdam, 2: 103–108.Google Scholar
  2. Dicke, M., Sabelis, M. W., Takabayashi, J., Bruin, J. and Posthumus, M. A., 1990. Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelo-chemicals: prospects for application in pest control. J. Chem. Ecol., 16: 3091–3118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elton, C. S., 1949. Population interspersion: an essay on animal community patterns. J. Ecol., 37: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Higashi, M., 1993. An extension of niche theory for complex interactions. In: Kawanabe, H., Cohen, J. E. and Iwasaki, K. (ed) Mutualism and community organization: behavioural, theoretical and food web approaches, 311–322. Oxford Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
  5. Higashi, M., 1995. Mechanisms for coexistence of various organisms. Creative World, 93: 30–49. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Higashi, M. and Ohgushi, T., 1990. Three interconnections in ecology. In: Kawanabe, H., Ohgushi, T. and Higashi, M. (ed), Ecology for tomorrow. Physiol. Ecol., 27 (Spec. No.): 199–205.Google Scholar
  7. Hori, M., 1983. Feeding ecology of thirteen species of Lamprologus coexisting at a rocky shore of Lake Taganyika. Physiol. Ecol., 20: 129–149.Google Scholar
  8. Hori, M., 1987. Mutualims and commensalism in the fish community of Lake Tanganyika. In: Kawano, S., Connell, J. H. and Hidaka, T. (ed) Evolution and coadaptation in biotic communities. 219–239. Univ. Tokyo Pr.Google Scholar
  9. Hori, M., 1991. Feeding relationships among cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyikia: effects of intra-and interspecific variations of feeding behaviour on their coexistence. Ecol. Intern. Bull. 19: 89–101.Google Scholar
  10. Hori, M., 1993. Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale-eating cichlid fish. Science, 260: 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kawanabe, H., 1982. Speciation would be occurred in particular life history stages. Science Tokyo, 52:527–529. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. Kawanabe, H., Ohgushi, T. and Higashi, M. (ed), 1993. Symbiosphere: ecological complexity for promoting biodiversity. Biol. Intern., Spec. Issue, 29. 86 p. Intern. Union Biol. Sci.Google Scholar
  13. Kohda, M., 1994. Interspecific societies in cichlid fishes: inter-and intraspecific relations in herbivores. In: Hori, M. (ed) Fishes in Lake Tanganyika: an attempt to solve a riddle of biodiversity, 144–160. Heibonsha. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Nakai, K., 1993. Foraging of brood predators restricted by territoriality of substrate-brooders in a cichlid fish assemblage. In: Kawanabe, H., Cohen, J. E. and Iwasaki, K. (ed) Mutualism and community organization: behavioural, theoretical and food web approaches, 84–108. Oxford Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
  15. Ohgushi, T. (ed) 1992. Various type of symbiosis: diversified interactions among species. 230 pp. Heibonsha. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Paine, R. T., 1969. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. Amer. Natur., 103: 91–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Solbrig, O., 1992. From genes to ecosystems: a research aggenda for biodiversity. 4+124 pp. IUBS. SCOPE and UNESCO.Google Scholar
  18. Takabayashi, J., 1992. Plants which employ body-guards: new picture of biological world brought by chemistry. In: Higashi, M. and Abe, T. (ed), What is symbiotic earth?, 184–189. Heibonsha. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Takabayashi, J., 1995. Reproductive strategy of plants and symbiosis. Creative World, 93: 12–29. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Takabayashi, J. and Dicke, M. 1993. Volatile allelochemicals that mediate interactions in a tritrophic system consisting of predatory mites, spider mites, and plants. In: Kawanabe, H., Cohen, J. E. and Iwasaki, K. (ed) Mutualism and community organization: behavioural, theoretical and food web approaches, 280–295. Oxford Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
  21. Takamura, K., 1983. Interspecific relationship between two aufwuchs eaters Petrochromis polyodon and Tropheus moorei of Lake Tanganyika, with a discussion on the evolution and functions of a symbiotic relationship. Physiol. Ecol., 20: 59–69.Google Scholar
  22. Yuma, M., 1993. Competitive and co-operative interactions in Lake Tanganyika fish communities. In: Kawanabe, H., Cohen, J. E. and Iwasaki, K. (ed) Mutualism and community organization: behavioural, theoretical and food web approaches, 213–227. Oxford Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
  23. Yuma, M., 1994. Food habits and foraging behaviour of benthivorous cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika. Env. Biol. Fishes, 39: 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroya Kawanabe
    • 1
  1. 1.Lake Biwa MuseumShigaJapan

Personalised recommendations