Population management in new plant breeding approaches

  • Subodh K. Jain
Part of the Monographiae Biologicae book series (MOBI, volume 67)


This chapter briefly reviews some examples of the application of population and quantitative genetics to the development of new breeding methods. Plant breeding methods are all centered on the basic concepts of exploiting natural or artificially induced genetic variation in crop plants through selection, agronomic trials, and repeated cycles of this controlled evolutionary scheme. Methods vary in terms of the breeding system of the crop species (e.g. outbreeding, inbreeding, asexual), breeding objectives and the plant breeder’s primary training or research area. Over the past three decades a significant shift to population genetic and evolutionary thinking has modified many breeding approaches in terms of methods for synthesizing initial gene pools, recurrent selection procedures for improving source populations, and the desired genetic heterogeneity in the end product cultivars. This shift has been induced by several factors: greater recognition of the role of variation in populations due to increase in evolutionary training, greater availability of genetic resources, ecological and environmental issues, and changes in agriculture toward long-term biocontrol and multi-species strategies. Theoretical ideas have also played a role in understanding these new methods although most basic principles are too general or elementary to be cited as the direct basis for developing any particular breeding methods. For example, recurrent selection involves some general background in polygenic inheritance models and in the basic theory of selection response. However, even with much empirical work from numerous crop breeding projects, only general guidance, not specific rules, can be obtained from them. In managing genetically heterogeneous host populations for developing durable disease resistance, indeed several interesting discoveries have been made on the genetic basis of resistance, cost of virulence, pathogenicity in mixed populations, epidemiology of different fungi, and so on.

In the management of forestry and rangeland communities, selection criteria include numerous population and community ecological variables related to persistence (recruitment), niche evolution, coexistence, community response to invasive species, and herbivory. Likewise, the development of new crops from wild biota often requires a basic understanding of the variation patterns, adaptations, reproductive biology, and role of natural enemies. Assembly of their genetic resources and initial domestication steps require perhaps a few major genes controlling such traits as seed retention at maturity, earliness, or apomixis; a great deal of population management using quantitative genetics then yields improvements in yield or crop adaptability to a region and an agroecosystem. There is clearly a need to involve some population biology in the training of plant breeders.


Plant Breeding Stem Rust Pure Stand Recurrent Selection Quantitative Genetic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected readings

  1. Aarsen, L. W. and R. Turkington. 1985. Biotic specialization between neighboring genotypes in Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens in a permanent pasture. J. Ecol. 73: 605–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allard, R. W. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Allard, R. W. 1988. Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness in cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. J. Heredit 79: 225–238.Google Scholar
  4. Allard, R. W. and P. E. Hansche. 1964. Some parameters of population variability. Adv. Agron. 16:281–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andow, D. A. and P.M. Rosset. 1990. Integrated pest management. In: Agriculturl Ecology (C. R. Carroll, J.H. Vandermeer, and P. Rosset eds) pp. 413–440. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, L. H. and R. N. Curnow. 1969. Choice of population size and use of variation between replicate populations in plant breeding selection programs. Crop Sci. 9: 555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barker, J. S. F. and R. H. Thomas. 1988. A quantitative genetic perspective on adaptive evolution. In: V. Loeschcke (ed). Genetic Constraints in Adaptive Evolution. Springer-Verlag, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
  8. Barrett, J. A. 1980. Pathogen evolution in multilines and varietal mixtures. J. Plant Dis. 87: 383–396.Google Scholar
  9. Bond, D. A. 1987. Recent developments in breeding field beans (Vicia faba L.). Plant Breeding 99: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burdon, J. J. 1980. Intra-specific diversity in a natural population of Trifolium repens. J. Ecology 68: 717–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burdon, J. J. 1987. Diseases and Plant Population Biology. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burdon, R. D. 1989. Recruitment for breeding populations: Objectives, genetics, and complementation. In: B. S. Weir, E. J. Eisen, M. M. Goodman and G. Namkoong, eds., Quantitative Genetics, pp. 555–572. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  13. Cervantes, S.T., M. Goodman, E. D. Casas and J. O. Rawlings. 1978. Use of genetic effects and genotype by environmental interactions for the classification of Mexican races of maize. Genetics 90: 339–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chevalt, C. 1989. Control of genetic drift in selected populations. In: B. S. Weir, E. J. Eisen, M. M. Goodman and G. Namkoong, eds., Quantitative Genetics, pp. 379–394. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  15. Cocks, P. S., M. J. Mathison and E. J. Crawford. From wild plants to pasture cultivars: annual medics and subterranean clover in Southern Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Cox, T. S., L. R. House and K. J. Frey. 1985. Trait associations in introgressed populations of sorghum. Zeitsel. fur Pflanzenz. 94: 265–277.Google Scholar
  17. Cubero, J.I. and M.T. Moreno. 1986. Breeding for self-fertility. In: P.D. Hebbelthwrite, T. C. K. Dawkins, M. C. Heath and G. Lockwood (eds.), Vicia faba. Agronomy, Physiology and Breeding.Google Scholar
  18. Donnelly, E. D. 1979. Selection for chasmogamy in Sericea lespedeza. Crop Sci. 19(4): 528–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eberhart, S. A., M. N. Harrison and F. Ogada. 1967. A comprehensive breeding system. Zuchter 37:169–174.Google Scholar
  20. Evans, D. R., J. Hill, T.A. Williams and I. Rhodes. 1985. Effects of conexistence on the performance of white clover-perennial ryegrass mixtures. Oecologia 66: 536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Francis, C. A. (ed.). 1986. Multiple cropping: Practices and potentials. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Francis, C. A. 1986. Variety development for multiple cropping systems. CRC Critical Rev. In Plant Sci. 3:133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gregorius, H. R. 1985. (ed) Population Genetics in Forestry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  24. Hallauer, A. R. 1987. Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their application. CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Sci. 3(1)Google Scholar
  25. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Hill, J. and P. T. Michaelson-Yeates. 1987. Effects of competition upon the productivity of white clover-perennial ryegrss mixture. Genetic analysis. Plant Breeding 99: 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill, W. G. and P. D. Keightley. 1989. Interrelations of mutation, population size, artificial and natural selection. In Quant. Genetics (B. S. Weir et al.) Sinauer.Google Scholar
  28. Humphreys, L. R. 1981. Environmental adaptation of tropical pasture plants. MacMilland, London.Google Scholar
  29. ICARDA. 1985. Pasture, forage and livestock. Intern. Center for Agric. Res. in the Dry Areas. Annual Report.Google Scholar
  30. Jain, S. K. 1989. Domestication of Limnanthes (meadowfoam) as a new oil crop. Intern. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
  31. Jain, S. K. 1990. Variation and selection in plant populations. In: K. Wöhrman and S. Jain (eds.) Population Biology, Chapter 6, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 199–230.Google Scholar
  32. Jain, S. K. P. Kulakow and I. Peters. 1986. Genetics and breeding of grain amaranths. Proc. 3rd Amaranch Conf., Rodale Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jensen, N. F. 1988. Plant Breeding Methodology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Kogan, M. (ed.) 1986. Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management Practice. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Kulakow, P. and J. Ennis. 1988. Variation in the F1 and F2 generations of crosses between tetraploid Sorghum bicolor and S. halepense. The Land Inst. Report 5: 23–29.Google Scholar
  36. Lange, W., A. C. Zeven and N. G. Hogenboom. 1984. (eds.). Efficiency in Plant Breeding. PUDFOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  37. Mareck, J. H. and C. O. Gardner. 1979. Response to mass selection in maize and stability of resulting populations. Crop Sci. 19: 779–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marshall, D. R. 1989. Crop genetic resources: Current and emerging issues. In: A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. Kahler and B. S. Weir (eds.), Plant Populatin Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  39. Matzinger, D. F. and E. A. Wernsman. 1968. Four cycles of mass selection in a synthetic variety of an autogamous species Nicotiana tabacum L. Crop Sci. 8: 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, P. A. and J. P. Rawlings. 1971. Breakup of linkage blocks in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum. Crop Sci. 11: 695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moll, R. H. and C. W. Stuber. 1974. Quantitative genetics. Adv. Agron. 26Google Scholar
  42. Mona, O. 1989. Population genetics in forest tree improvement, pp. 282–298. In: A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler and B. Weir (eds.). Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetics Resources. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  43. Monti, L. M. and L. Frusciante. 1984. Selection methods for yield improvement in faba beans. In P. D. Hebbilthwaite, T. C. K. Dawkins, M. C. Heath and G. Lockwood (eds). Vicia faba: Agronomy, Physiology and Breeding.Google Scholar
  44. Mundt, C. C. 1990. Disease dynmaics in agroecosystems. pp. 263–300. In: C. R. Carroll, J. H. Vandeermer and P. M. Rosset (eds). Agroecology. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Namkong, G., H. C. Kang and J. S. Brouard. 1989. Tree breeding: Principles and Strategies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  46. Nevo, E. 1983. Genetic resources of wild emmer wheat: structure, evolution and application in breeding. Proc. 6th Intern. Wheat. Genetics Symp. 421–431.Google Scholar
  47. Power, A. G. and P. Kareiwa. 1990. Herbivorous insects in agroecosystems. pp. 301–328. In: C. R. Carroll, J. H. Vandermeer and P. Rosset (eds.). Agroecology. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Qualset, C. O. 1975. Sampling germplasm in a center of diversity: an example of disease resistance in Ethiopian barley. In Frankel, O. H. and J. G. Hawkes (eds.) Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge U. Press. Chapter 5: 81–96.Google Scholar
  49. Ramage, R. T. 1987. A history of barley breeding methods. Plant Breeding Reviews 5: 95–138.Google Scholar
  50. Rhodes, I. and W. Harris. 1979. The nature and basis of differences in sward composition and yield in ryegrass-white clover mixtures, pp. 55–60. In: A. H. Charles and R. J. Haggar (eds.) Changes in Sward Composition and Productivity. British Grassland Sco., Harley, England.Google Scholar
  51. Schnell, F.W. 1981. Breeding Methods: Synthesis Proc. EUCARPIA Meeting, Quant. Genetics and Breeding Methods.Google Scholar
  52. Schnell, F.W. 1989. Quantitative genetics in crop improvement. In: B. S. Weir, E. J. Eisen, M. M. Goodman and G. Nankoong, Eds. Quantitative Genetics, pp. 462–464. Sinauer Sunderland.Google Scholar
  53. Simmonds, N. W. 1962. Variability in crop plants, its use and conservtion. Biol. Revs. 37: 422–465.Google Scholar
  54. Simmonds, N. W. 1979. Principles of Crop Improvement. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  55. Snaydon, R. W. 1984. Plant demography in an agricultural context. In R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan (eds) — Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology, Sinauer, Sunderland. pp. 389–407.Google Scholar
  56. Turkington, R. 1985. Variation and differentiation in populations of Trifolium repens in permanent pastures. In: J. White (ed) Studies on Plant Demography, Chapter 5, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar
  57. Via, S. 1986. Quantitative genetic models and the evolution of pesticide resistance. In Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  58. Weber, W. E., C. O. Qualset, and G. Wricke. 1989. Selection strategies for the improvement of autogamous species, pp. 299–316. In A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler and B. S. Weir (eds.). Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Sinauer, Suderland.Google Scholar
  59. Witcombe, J. R. and P. J. Murphy. 1986. Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya. 2. Why do they differ from each other so extensively? Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 736–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolfe, M. S. and C. E. Caten (eds.) 1987. Populations of Plant Pathogens: Their Dynamics and Genetics. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  61. Wolfe, M. S. and J. Barrett. 1985.Google Scholar
  62. Wricke, G. and W. E. Weber. 1978. Number of lines for synthetic varieties in rye. Ann. Amelior. Plantes 28:667–674.Google Scholar
  63. Wricke, G. and W. E. Weber. 1986. Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. W. DeGruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  64. Wright, A. J. 1973. The selection of parents for synthetic varieties of outbreeding diploid crops. Theor. Appl. Genet. 43: 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zobel, B. J. and J. Talbert. 1984. Applied forest tree improvement. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subodh K. Jain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Range ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations