Firm Characteristics and Workers’ Compensation Claims Incidence

  • H. Allan Hunt
  • Rochelle V. Habeck
  • Michael J. Leahy
Part of the Huebner International Series on Risk, Insurance and Economic Security book series (HSRI, volume 16)


The research effort that underlies this chapter began with an intriguing discovery, namely, wide differences in litigation rates among the workers’ compensation case (WC) populations in different cities in Michigan that were demonstrated in a previous Upjohn Institute study (Hunt, 1981). The question of the possible WC cost impact of such differences became a policy issue in Michigan during the battle for the location of the new GM Saturn facility. Workers’ compensation costs in Michigan had risen significantly over the twenty years from 1958 to 1978, to the point that WC costs were a very significant negative element in the Michigan business climate (Burton, Hunt, and Krueger, 1985). If lower WC litigation rates in southwest Michigan could offset some of the cost disadvantage to a Michigan Saturn location, the Michigan Department of Commerce wanted to know about it.


Match Rate Compensation Claim Compensation Insurance Employer Survey Disability Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Askey, D.E. (1988). “Effective Workers’ Compensation Loss Control Strategies.” Betterly Risk Management Commentary 9(1):1–7.Google Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, M. (1985). “Forestalling Disincentives to Return to Work.” Business and Health 2(4):30–32.Google Scholar
  3. Burton, J.F., H.A. Hunt, and A.B. Krueger (1985). “Interstate Variations in the Employers’ Cost of Workers’ Compensation, with Particular Reference to Michigan and the Other Great Lakes States.” Ithaca, NY: Workers’ Disability Income Systems.Google Scholar
  4. Hunt, H.A. (1988). “The Incidence of Workers’ Compensation Claims in Michigan.” Final report to Bureau of Workers’ Disability Compensation, Michigan Department of Labor. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  5. Hunt, H.A. (1981). Workers’ Compensation System in Michigan. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  6. Munrowd, D.A. and R.V. Habeck (1987). “Disability Management and Rehabilitation: An Analysis of Programs, Costs, and Outcomes.” Final report submitted to the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  7. Rosen, R.H. (1986). Healthy Companies: A Human Resources Approach. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  8. Sims, R.H. (1988). Hazard Abatement as a Function of Firm Size: The Effects of Internal Firm Characteristics and External Incentives. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rand Graduate Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Tate, D.G.., R.V. Habeck, and D.E. Galvin (1986). “Disability Management: Origins, Concepts and Principles for Practice.” Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling 17(3):5–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Allan Hunt
  • Rochelle V. Habeck
  • Michael J. Leahy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations