Advertisement

Analysis of Epitopes in The Cholera Family of Enterotoxins

  • Mohsammad Kazemi
  • Richard A. Finkelstein

Abstract

It is now over 30 years since the cholera enterotoxin was discovered in India and more than 20 years since it was first purified to homogeneity. Early expectations that, as with diphtheria and tetanus, a toxoid vaccine would solve the cholera problem have not been fulfilled. We are examining the reasons why cholera toxin (CT) vaccines have failed to provide effective immunity.

Studies with polyclonal (pAbs) and monoclonal (mAbs) antibodies reveal significant differences among the CTs and CT-related enterotoxins (LTs). All field trials of toxoid vaccines have used CT-1 antigen against the prevailing epitype of CT, usually CT-2. Single amino acid substitutions in the immunodominant B-subunit protein have profound effects on immunological reactivity. We have employed pAbs and mAbs, genetically engineered chimeric B-subunit proteins, checkerboard immunoblotting (CBIB), synthetic peptides and their antisera, and sequential overlapping synthetic hexapeptides representing the B-subunit chain to identify epitopes in the CT family. Reactivity of some, but not all, synthetic hexapeptides with epitope activity with polyclonal antisera can be reduced by pretreatment of the serum with the native toxin protein indicating that certain continuous epitopes are exposed on the surface of the native protein. Interestingly, the holotoxin was more effective in this regard than the native B-subunit pentamer indicating a conformational difference between the two. Human convalescent sera gave diffuse patterns of reactivity with discontinuous (conformational) epitopes. A major tetrapeptide epitope has been identified in a conserved region of the protein. Substitution of amino acids in this region can be permissive or can reduce or eliminate activity. Studies like these may lead to the development of rational synthetic peptide vaccines, but a vaccine composed only of CT antigen can only protect against severe life-threatening diarrhea, not all the diarrhea caused by cholera vibrios.

Keywords

Cholera Toxin Single Amino Acid Substitution Epitopic Region Cholera Vaccine Epitope Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De, S.N., 1959, Enterotoxicity of bacteria-free culture filtrate of Vibrio cholerae, Nature, 183:1533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dutta, N.K., Panse, M.W., and Kulkarni, P.R.,1959, Role of cholera toxin in experimental cholera, J. Bacteriol., 78:594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Finkelstein, R.A., and LoSpalluto, J.J., 1969, Pathogenesis of experimental cholera: preparation and isolation of choleragen and choleragenoid, J. Exp. Med., 130:185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finkelstein, R.A., Burks, M.F., Zupan, A., Dallas, W.S., Jacob, CO., and Ludwig, D.S., 1987, Epitopes of the cholera family of enterotoxins, Rev. Infect. Dis., 9:544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Finkelstein, R.A., 1988, Cholera, the cholera enterotoxins, and the cholera enterotoxin-related enterotoxin family, pp. 85–102. In: Immunochemical and molecular genetic analysis of bacterial pathogens, P. Owen and T.J. Foster (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Geysen, H.M., Rodda, S.J., Mason, T.J., Tribbick, G., and Schoofs, P.G., 1987, Strategies for epitope analysis using peptide synthesis, J. Immunol. Methods, 102:259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacob, CO., Arnon, R., and Finkelstein, R.A.,1986a, Immunity to heat-labile enterotoxins of porcine and human Escherichia coli strains achieved with synthetic cholera toxin peptides, Infect. Immun., 52:562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacob, CO., Grossfeld, S., Sela, M., and Arnon, R., 1986b, Priming immune response to cholera toxin induced by synthetic peptides, Eur. J. Immunol., 16:1057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacob, CO., Sela, M., and Arnon, R., 1983, Antibodies against synthetic peptides of the B-subunit of cholera toxin:cross-reaction and neutralization of the toxin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:7611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacob, CO., Sela, M., Pines, M., Hurwitz, S., and Arnon, R., 1984, Both cholera toxin-induced adenylate cyclase activation and cholera toxin biological activity are inhibited by antibodies against related synthetic peptides, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 81:7893.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kazemi, M., and Finkelstein, R.A., 1990a, Checkerboard immunoblotting (CBIB):an efficient, rapid, and sensitive method of assaying multiple antigen/antibody cross-reactivities, J. Immunol. Methods, 128:143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kazemi, M., and Finkelstein, R.A., 1990b, Study of epitopes of cholera enterotoxin-related enterotoxins using checkerboard immunoblotting, Infect. Immun., 58:2352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kazemi, M., and Finkelstein, R.A., 1991, Mapping epitopic regions of cholera toxin B-subunit protein, Molec. Immunol., 28: 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohsammad Kazemi
    • 1
  • Richard A. Finkelstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Microbiology and ImmunologySchool of Medicine, University of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbia

Personalised recommendations