Opportunities and Constraints to Improved Water Markets in Mexico

  • Robert R. Hearne
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 15)


Throughout the world, the growing demands for potable water, irrigated agriculture, and environmental services is putting increasing pressure on finite supplies of freshwater resources (xcWorld Bank, 1993). Because of increasing demand and finite supplies, new methodologies and new systems for more efficient and equitable distribution of water between competing users need to be developed. Traditionally, centralized, state managed, command-and-control systems have been employed to ensure equitable distribution of water and to provide subsidized water delivery services to farms and cities. But poor state management, increasing fiscal pressures on central governments, increasing concern about the environmental effects of large catchment and irrigation systems, and the continual growth of urban populations have led certain governments and agencies to rethink the role of government in water resources management. A new paradigm of decentralized management, user control of water delivery services, transferable water-use rights, and water markets has emerged. Often this paradigm remains as an idea propelled by economists and policy advisors, with little analysis of how this paradigm has functioned in the field (xcEaster and Hearne, 1995); (xcRosegrant and Gazmuri Schleyer, 1994); (xcRosegrant and Binswanger, 1994).


Irrigation System Water Resource Management Water Allocation Canal System Water Delivery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chang, C. and R. Griffin, 1992. “Water Marketing as a Reallocative Institution in Texas.” Water Resources Research. 28:879–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cummings, R. and V. Nercessiantz, 1994. “The Use of Pricing to Enhance Water Use Efficiency in Irrigation: Case Studies from Mexico and the United States,” in Water Policy and Water Markets: Selected Papers and Proceedings from the WorldBank’s Ninth Annual Irrigation and Drainage Seminar, Annapolis Maryland, December 8–10, 1992. World Bank Technical Paper 249. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Easter, K. William and R.R. Hearne, 1995. “Water Markets and Decentralized Water Resources Management: International Problems and Opportunities.” Water Resources Bulletin. 31:9–20.Google Scholar
  4. Gorriz, C., A. Subramanian, and J. Simas, 1995. Irrigation Management Transfer in Mexico: Process and Progress. The World Bank Technical Paper Number 292, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Hearne, R.R. and K. William Easter, 1995. Water Allocation and Water Markets: An Analysis of Gains-From-Trade in Chile. The World Bank Technical Paper Number 315, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Hearne, R.R. and K. William Easter, 1997. “The Economic and Financial Gains From Water Markets in Chile.” Agricultural Economics, 15:187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hearne, R.R. and J.L Trava, 1997. Water Markets in Mexico: Opportunities and Constraints. Environmental Economics Programme Discussion Paper, 97-01, IIED, London.Google Scholar
  8. Roemer, A., 1994. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Water, Federal Law, and Institutions: The Mexican Case. Ph.D. Thesis. Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. Rosegrant, M. and H. Binswanger, 1994. “Markets in Tradable Water Rights: Potential for Efficiency Gains in Developing Country Water Resource Allocation.” World Development. 22(11): 1613–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosegrant, M. and R. Gazmuri Schleyer, 1994. Reforming Water Allocation Policy Through Markets in Tradable Water Rights: Lessons from Chile, Mexico, and California. EPTD Discussion Paper No. 6. International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Rosen, M. and R. Sexton, 1993. “Irrigation Districts and Water Markets: An Application of Cooperative Decision-Making Theory.” Land Economics. 69:39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. SEMARNAP, 1995. National Water Planning in Mexico: Experiences, Results, and Perspectives. SEMARNAP. Mexico.Google Scholar
  13. World Bank, 1993. Water Resources Management. A World Bank Policy Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Hearne
    • 1
  1. 1.International Institute for Environment and DevelopmentLondonUK

Personalised recommendations