Advertisement

Physical Mechanisms for Biological Effects of Low Field Intensity ELF Magnetic Fields

  • Charles Polk

Introduction

Biological effects of high intensity ELF electric fields, such as muscle stimulation and - at still higher intensities - cell damage by electroporation and heating, are reasonably well (although not completely) understood. However power frequency effects of magnetically induced electric fields of less than 10 -3 V/m or alternating magnetic fields of less than about 100 μT cannot be explained very well at the present time. The biological processes involved, notably signal transduction at the cell membrane and subsequent biochemical processes involving “second messengers” are beginning to be identified (Adcy, 1990; Luben, 1993). These processes involve vast amplification of the incident “signal” with metabolically supplied energy. The physical mechanisms of conversion from an electric or magnetic field to biochemical process are however unknown at the present time. As a consequence we do not know which aspect of the applied or environment field is important. Properties such as polarization, duration and/or intermittency of the signal, frequency and harmonic content may turn out to be as important as amplitude. The biological, chemical and mechanical condition of the organism (e.g. stage in cell cycle, stimulation by a mitogen or cell density) will also influence the effectiveness of the applied field. A key question, which is still only resolved for a few experimentally observed effects, is whether specific biological results arc caused directly by the magnetic field or by the electric field that is induced in tissue by a time varying magnetic field. Particularly for fields larger than about 100 μT direct “magne-tochemical” effects have been suggested and the presence of magnetite particles in some tissues may also play a biological role. Experimental findings suggest that effects of induced electric fields are particularly likely when their magnitudes at the tissue or cell level are relatively “large”, of the order of 10-3 V/m or larger, (McLeod et al., 1993b; Liburdy, 1992; Lyle et al., 1988), and when multiple cells are connected by gap junctions. Induced electric fields may also affect the motion of “counterions” on the cell surface and possibly the structural fluctuations of nucleic acid molecules. While most proteins have a small net electrostatic charge, nucleic acids are polyelectrolytes with large net charge and are surrounded by counterions (McCammon and Harvey, 1987). However in view of the inefficiency of electric field induction by an ELF magnetic field, illustrated by equation (25). The mechanisms for “direct” interaction of time varying magnetic fields with biological processes need serious consideration. This is particularly necessary when the applied ELF magnetic fields that produce unambiguous biological effects are of such amplitude and orientation (in relation to the culture medium or animal) as to produce very small induced electric fields. Experimental results have suggested that the relative magnitude and direction of a static magnetic field (such as that of the earth) can determine the biological effectiveness of a simultaneously present alternating field in some biological systems under controlled laboratory conditions.

Keywords

Magnetic Field Cyclotron Resonance Thermal Noise Static Magnetic Field Stochastic Resonance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarholt E, Jaberansari M, Jafari-Asl A H. Marsh P N, Smith C W (1988): NMR Condition and Biological Systems. In “Modern Bioelectricity” (Marino A A, ed.). New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc. pp.75–104.Google Scholar
  2. Adair R K (1992): Criticism of Lednev’s mechanism for the influence of weak magnetic fields on biological systems. Bioelectromagnetics 13: 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adair R K, (1993): Effects of ELF Magnetic Fields on Biological Magnetite. Bioelectromagnetics 14-1. 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adey W R (1990): Eleetromagnetic fields and the essence of living systems. In “Modern Radio Science 1990” (Bach J. ed.), Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ando I, Webb G A (1983): “Theory of NMR Parameters.” London, New York: Academic Press, pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
  6. Baeriswyl D, Droz D, Malaspinas A, Martolini P (eds) (1987): “Lecture Notes in Physics 284, Physics in Living matter.” Berlin Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Bell D A (1985): “Noise and the Solid State.” New York: A Halsted Press Book, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Berridge M J and Galione A (1988): Cytosolic calcium oscillators (1988): The FASEB Jl. 2: 3074–3082.Google Scholar
  9. Blackman C F, Benane S G, Elliott D J, House D E, Pollock M M (1988): Influence of Electromagnetic Fields on the Efflux of Calcium Ions from Brain Tissue in Vitro: A Three-Model Analysis Consistent with the Frequency Response up to 510 Hz. Bioelectromagnetics 9: 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackman C F, Kinney L S, House D E, Joines W T (1989): Multiple Power-Density Windows and Their Possiblc Origin. Bioelectromagnetics 10: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackman C F, Blanchard J P, Benane S G and House D E (1994): Empirical Test of an Ion Parametric Resonance Model for Magnetic Field Interactions with PC-12 Cells. Bioelectromagnetics 15: 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanchard J P and Blackman C F (1994): Clarification and Application of an Ion Parametric Resonance Model for Magnetic Field Interaction with Biological Systems. Bioelectromagnetics 15: 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blankenship R E, Schaafsma T J, Parson W W (1977): Magnetic field effects on radical pair intermediates in bacterial photosynthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 461: 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglass J K, Wilkens L, Pantazelov E and Moss F (1993): Noise enhancement of information transfer in cray fish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance. Nature 365: 337–340.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Durney C H, Rushforth C K, Anderson A A (1988): Resonant dc-ac magnetic fields: calculated response. Bioelectromagnetics 9(4): 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eichwald C and Kaiser F (1993): Model for Receptor-Controlled Cytosolic Calcium Oscillations and for External Influences on the Signal Pathway. Biophys. Jl. 65: (Nov.) 2047–2058.Google Scholar
  17. Engstrom S (1994): Dynamical properties of Lednev’s parameteric resonance mechanism. Annual Review of Research on Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields from Generation, Delivery and Use of Electricity. DOE, EPRI, EPA, NYDPS, NIEHS. Nov. 6–10, Alberquerque N.M. Available from W L Associates, Frederick. MD 21701. Paper A-21. Also in press (1985): Bioelectromagnetics 16.Google Scholar
  18. Feychting M and Ahlbom A (1993): Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-power voltage lines. Am. J. Epidem. 138: 467–481.Google Scholar
  19. Frankel R B (1986): Biological Effects of Static Magnetic Fields. In Polk C and Postow E (eds.l) “CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields”. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc. pp. 180, 181.Google Scholar
  20. Freifelder D (1982): “Principles of Physical Chemistry with Applications to the Biological Sciences.” 2nd ed. Boston: Jones and Barlett Publications Inc., p.379.Google Scholar
  21. Frohlich H (1986): Coherent Excitation in Active Biological Systems. In Gutman H Keyser H (eds) “Modern Biochemistry.” London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gailey P C (1993): A Biophysical Model for the Effects of ELF Fields on Cellular Growth Control. BEMS Abstracts, 15th Annual Meeting, 1970, pp. 70, 71.Google Scholar
  23. Goodman R, Henderson A S (1991): Transcription and Translation in Cells Exposed to Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 25: 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grundler W, Kaiser F, Keilmann F, Walleczek J (1991): Mechanisms of Electromagnetic Interaction with Cellular Systems. Naturwissenschaffen 79: 551–559.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Haken H, Wolf H C (1984): “Atomic and Quantum Physics”. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Toronto: Springer-Verlag, pp. 202–208.Google Scholar
  26. Halle B (1988): On the cyclotron resonance mechanism for magnetic field effects on transmembrane conductivity. Bioelectromagnetics 9: 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton C A. Hewitt J P, McLauchlan K E, Steiner U E (1988): High resolution studies of the effects of magnetic fields on chemical reactions. Molecular Physics 65: 423–438.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoff A J, Rademaker H, Van Grondelle R, Duysens LNM (1977): On the magnetic field dependence of the yield of the triplet state in reaction centers of photosynthetic bacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 460: 547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacob R (1990): Calcium oscillations in electrically non-excitable cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1052: 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaiser F (1993): Explanation of Biological Effects of Low-Intensity Electric. Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields by Nonlinear Dynamics. Ninth Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics, Monterey, CA (March 22–26).Google Scholar
  31. Kaiser F (1994): Nonlinear Dynamics and Biophysical Systems: Interaction of Static and Periodic Fields with Nonlinear Periodic Processes. Kleinheubacher Berichte 37 (German URSI Meeting. Oct. 4–8. 1993).Google Scholar
  32. Kato M, Honma K-I, Shigemitsu T, Shiga Y (1993): Effects of Exposure to Circularly Polarized 50 Hz Magnetic Field on Plasma and Pineal Melatonin Levels in Rats. Bioelectromagnetics 14: 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirschvink J L (1992): Comment on Constraints on biological effects of weak extremely-low frequency electromagnetic fields. Physical Review A, 46, no. 4 (15 August), 2178–2184.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirschvink J L, Kobayashi-Kirschvink A, Woodford B J (1992): Magnetic Biomineralization in the Human Brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, (Biophysics), 89(86), 7683–7687.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirschvink J L, Kobayashi-Kirschvink A (1995): Magnetic Biomineralization in Human Pathological Tissues. Chapt.— in this book.Google Scholar
  36. Kruglikov I L, Dertinger H (1994): Stochastic Resonance as a Possible Mechanism of Amplification of Weak Electric Signals in Living Cells. Bioelectromagnetics 15: 539–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lakhtakia A, Varadan V K, Varadan V V (1989): “Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields in Chiral Media.” (Lecture Notes in Physics no. 335). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Lauffenburger D A and Linderman J J (1993): “Receptors, Models for Binding, Trafficking and Signaling”. New York. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lednev V V (1991): Possible mechanism for influence of weak magnetic fields on biosystems. Bioelectromagnetics 12: 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lednev V V (1993): Possible mechanism for the effect of weak magnetic fields on biological systems: Correction of the basic expression and its consequences, In Blank M (ed.): “Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine.” San Francisco, San Francisco Press, pp. 550–552.Google Scholar
  41. Liboff A R, Williams T, Strong D M, Wjstar R Jr (1984): Time-varying magnetic fields: effects on DNA synthesis. Science 223: 818–820.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  42. Liboff A R (1985): Cyclotron resonance in membrane transport. In Chiabrera. Nicolini, Schwan (eds): “Interaction between Electromagnetic Fields and Cells.” London: Plenum, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
  43. Liboff R A and McLeod B R (1988): Kinetics of Channelized Membrane Ions in Magnetic Fields. Bioelectromugnetics 9: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liburdy R P (1992): Calcium signal in lymphocytes and ELF fields: Evidence for an electric field metric and a site of interaction involving the calcium ion channel. FEBS Leiters 301: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liburdy R P, Sloma T R, Sokolic R. Yaswen P (1993): ELF magnetic fields, breast cancer and melatonin: 60 Hz fields block melatonin;s oncostatic action on ER+ breast cancer cell proliferation. J. Pineal Res. 14: 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Litovitz T A, Montrose C J, Doinov P, Brown K M, Barber M (1994): Superimposing spatially coherent electromagnetic noise inhibits field-induced abnormalities in developing chick embrios. Bioelectromagnetics 15: 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luben R A (1993): Effects of low-energy electromagnetic fields on signal transduction by G protein-linked receptors. In Blank M (ed.) “Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine.”Google Scholar
  48. Lyle D B, Ayotte R I, Sheppard A R, Adey R W (1988): Suppression of T-lymphocyte Cytotoxicity Following Exposure to 60 Hz Sinusoidal Electric Fields. Bioelectromagnetics 9: 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lyle D B, Wang X, Ayotte R I, Sheppard A R, Adey W R (1991): Calcium Uptake by Leukemic and Normal T-Lymphocytes Exposed to Low Frequency Magnetic Fields. Bioelectromagneties 12: 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCammon J A, Harvey S C (1987): “Dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids”. Cambridge, London, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. McLauchlan K A (1989): Magnetokinetics. mechanistics and synthesis. Chemistry in Britain, Sept. 895–898.Google Scholar
  52. Meleod B R, Rubin C T, Donahue H J, Guilak F (1993a): Role of Polarization Forces in Mediating the Interaction of Low-Frequency Electric Fields with Living Tissue. In Blank M (ed.) “Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine.” San Francisco: San Francisco Press, Inc. pp. 559–562.Google Scholar
  53. McLeod K J, Donahue H J, Fontaine M-A, Rubin C T (1993b): Cell Density Effects on the Interaction of Electric Fields with Cells in vitro. In Blank M (ed.): “Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine.” San Francisco: San Francisco Press, 291–294.Google Scholar
  54. McNamara B. Wiesenfeld K (1989): Theory of stochastic resonance. Phys. Rev. A 39(9): 4854–4869.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  55. Mehta S, Blackinton D, Wiesendanger M, Wanebo H, Lefebvre M, Cherlin D, Polk C (1993): Accelerated Human Lymphocyte Growth in a 1 G, 15 Hz Magnetic Field. In Blank M (ed.) “Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine.” San Francisco: San Francisco Press. Inc. pp. 637–639.Google Scholar
  56. Misakian M, Kaune W T (1990): Optimal experimental design for in vitro studies with ELF magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 11: 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moss F (1991): Stochastic Resonance. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 95(3): 303–311.Google Scholar
  58. Myer T, Styer L (1991): Calcium Spiking. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 20: 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parkinson W C, Sulik G L (1992): Diatom Response to Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields. Radiation Research 130:319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paudler W W (1971): “Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc. pp. 1–15, 81.Google Scholar
  61. Pilla A A, Nasser P R. Kaufman J J (1991): On the Sensitivity of Biological Cells and Tissues to Weak Environmental and Therapeutic Electromagnetic Fields. Proc. Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Part 2/5: 1021–1023.Google Scholar
  62. Podgoretski I and Khrustalev O A (1964): Interference effects in quantum transitions. Soviet Physics Uspekhi 6(5): 682–700.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  63. Pohl H A (1978): “Dielectrophoresis.” Cambridge, London, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Polk C (1992): Dosimetry of Extremely-Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields. Bioelectromagnerics 13.suppl. 1: 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Polk C (1994): Effects of extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields on biological magnetite. Bioelectromagnetics 15: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Polk C, Wu S-H (1994): AC/DC Magnetic Field Synergism: Comments on the Lednev and “IPR” Models. Annual Review of Research on Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields from Generation. Delivery and Use of Electricity. DOE, EPRI, EPA, NYDPS, NEHS, Nov. 6–10, Alberquerque N.M. Available from W/L Associates, Frederick, MD 21701, Paper A-20.Google Scholar
  67. Ruelle D (1991): “Chance and Chaos.” Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Semm P, Beason R C (1990): Responses to Small Magnetic Variations by Trigeminal System of the Bobolink. Brain Research Bulletin 25: 735–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith S D, McLeod B R, Liboff A R. Cooksey K (1987): Calcium Cyclotron Resonance and Diatom Mobility. Bioelectromagnetics 8: 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Steiner U E, Ulrich T (1989): Magnetic Field Effects in Chemical Kinetics and Related Phenomena. Chemical Rev. 89: 51–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stuchly M A, Xi W (1994): Modeling induced currents in biological cells exposed to low-frequency magnetic fields. Phys. Med. Biol. 39:1319–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomas J R, Schrot J, Liboff A R (1986): Low-intensity magnetic fields alter operant behavior in rats. Bioelectromagnetics 7: 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walleczek J (1993): Electromagnetic Interactions with Human Lymphocyte Calcium Regulation: Studies by Differential Real-Time Fluoresence Spectroscopy. BEMS Abstracts, 15th Annual Meeting, p. 14.Google Scholar
  74. Walleczck J (1995): Bio-Magnetochemistry: A Possible Paradigm for Understanding sub-kT Magnetic Field Interaction with Biological Systems. In Blank M (ed.): “Electromagnetic Fields: Biological Interactions and Mechanisms.” Washington, DC: ACS Books.Google Scholar
  75. Weast R C, Astle M J, Beyer W H, eds. (1986): “CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics.” 67th edition. Boca Raton. FL: CRC Press Inc. pp. B–219 to B–439.Google Scholar
  76. Weaver J C, Astumian D R (1990): The Response of Living Cells to Very Weak Electric Fields: The Thermal Noise Limit. Science 247 (26 January): 459–462.Google Scholar
  77. Werner H J, Schulten K, Weller A (1978): Electron transfer and spin exchange contributing to the magnetic field dependence of the primary photochemical reaction of bacterial photosynthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 502: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yost M G, Liburdy R P (1992): Time-varying and static magnetic fields act in combination to alter calcium signal transduction in the lymphocyte. FEBS 296: 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Polk
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Rhode IslandKingston

Personalised recommendations