The Potential Role of Geographical Information Systems Technology in Air Toxics Risk Assessment, Communication and Management

  • T. J. Moore
Part of the The GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 24)


The California Air Toxics“Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (Assembly Bill 2588) requires statewide implementation of a programme to identify carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic health risks associated with air toxics emitted by industry. Some of the programme’s immediate objectives are to assess the health risks associated with the total emissions from each regulated facility, to identify the degree of public exposure and to notify any public potentially exposed to significant risk levels. The extent of the database will also allow regulatory agencies to eventually develop and evaluate risk management strategies. This chapter discusses the application of a geographic information system (GIS) during the preparation of an Assembly Bill 2588 multipathway air toxics health risk assessment. A case study provides insight on the development of a health risk assessment database and system integration with dispersion and risk assessment modelling elements. The value and potential of a GIS in the data analysis and management throughout the risk assessment process are emphasized. Finally, the potential use of a GIS to communicate risk and assess cumulative (regional) impacts for risk management decision-making is addressed.


Geographic Information System Health Risk Assessment Geographic Information System Technology Receptor Grid Excess Cancer Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (1992). Air Toxics“Hot Spots” programme risk assessment guidelines. Cameron Park, CA, CAPCOA.Google Scholar
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (1989). Risk assessment guidance for Superfund, Volume 1. Human health evaluation manual (Part A). Interim final. Washington DC, USGPO. (EPA/540/1-89/002).Google Scholar
  3. Environmental Protection Agency (1992). Environmental equity: reducing risk for all communities. Volume 1. Workgroup report to the Administrator. Washington DC, USGPO. (EPA230-R-92-008).Google Scholar
  4. Francica, J.R. (1991). Taking a swim in the data pool. GIS World, 4(2): 94–96.Google Scholar
  5. Maggio, R.C. & D.W. Long (1991). Developing thematic maps from point sampling using thiessen polygon analysis. In: Proceedings of the GIS/LIS 91 Conference. Volume 1. Bethesda, MD, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Washington DC, Association of American Geographers and Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, Aurora, CO, AM/FM International, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  6. Parker, H.D. (1991). GIS NEWSLINK: Lotus cancels“Marketplace”. GIS World, 4(2), 24.Google Scholar
  7. Sears, R. (1992). Supplement to theACE2588 users guide, Version 92269. Ojai, CA.Google Scholar
  8. South Coast Air Quality Management District (1992). Defining“significant health risk” and notification requirements for the Air Toxics“Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588): discussion of possible approaches. Diamond Bar, CA, SCAQMD.Google Scholar
  9. Tran, K.T. & T.M. Murphy (1992). Users guide to the assessment of chemical exposure for AB 2588 (ACE2588) model, version 92092. Woodland Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Travis, C.C., S.A. Richter, E.A.C. Crouch, R. Wilson & E.D. Klema (1987). Cancer risk management: a review of 132 federal regulatory decisions. Environm Sci & Technol, 21(5): 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.ENSR Consulting and EngineeringCamarilloUSA

Personalised recommendations