External Deficit, Exchange Rate, and Competitiveness in Croatia: Is There a Problem?

  • Boris Vujčić
  • Tomislav Presečan


Looking at the performance indicators of the Croatian economy for 1996—its first postwar year—one cannot help but feel quite satisfied: GDP growth rate at 6 percent, inflation rate at 3.5 percent, balanced budget deficit, and unemployment rate at 10 percent. For a country that has gone through the turmoil of war during the critical initial phase of the transition process, these figures look better than one would expect. The same stable and high-growth environment prevailed in the first eight months of 1997. However, one important indicator of economic performance sheds some doubt on the sustainability of the current economic situation. The current-account deficit accounted for 7.3 percent of the GDP in 1996. Although this was down from almost 10 percent a year earlier, the first eight months of the 1997 again indicate a rapidly rising trade and current-account deficit. Recent experience of the Czech and Asian currency crises warrants increased sensitivity to the large external deficit problems. This chapter aims at analyzing the issue and at providing some insights for the economic policy.


Exchange Rate Foreign Direct Investment Real Exchange Rate Export Performance Transition Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borensztein Eduardo, Jose DeGregorio, and Jong Wha-Lee. (1994). “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?” IMF Working Paper 110.Google Scholar
  2. Corado C., Z. Wysonkinska, and J. Witowska (eds.). (1996). Foreign Direct Investment, East and West: The Experiences of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and Portugal (early results).Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, Sebastian. (1989). Real Exchange Rates, Devaluation and Adjustment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Feldman, A. Robert. (1994). “Measure of External Competitiveness for Germany.” IMF Working Paper 113.Google Scholar
  5. Grubel, H.G., and P.J. Lloyd. (1975). Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Havrylyshyn, Oleh, and Peter Kunzel. (1997). “Intra-Industry Trade of Arab Countries: An Indicator of Potential Competitiveness.” IMF Working Paper 97-47. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Helpman, Elhanan, and Paul Krugman. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Helpman, Elhanan, and Paul Krugman. (1989). Trade Policy and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hoekman, Bernard, and Simeon Djankov. (1996). “Intra-industry Trade, Foreign Direct Investments and the Reorientation of East European Exports.” CEPR Discussion Paper 1377.Google Scholar
  10. Krugman, Paul. (1997). “Currency Crises.” The Official Paul Krugman Web Page, http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www URL.Google Scholar
  11. Milesi-Ferreti, Gian Maria i Razin Assaf. (1996). “Current-Account Sustainability.” Princeton Studies in International Finance, No. 81, October.Google Scholar
  12. Stankovski, J. (1996). “The Role of FDI in Eastern Europe.” Austrian Economic Quarterly, 2.Google Scholar
  13. Verdoorn, P.J. (1960). “The Intra-Bloc Trade of Benelux.” In E.A.G. Robinson (ed.), Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations, Proceedings of Conference Held by the International Economic Association, London (pp. 291–318).Google Scholar
  14. Walsh, B. (1996). “Stabilization and Adjustment in a Small Open Economy: Ireland, 1979–95.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3): 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Vujčić
    • 1
  • Tomislav Presečan
  1. 1.Croatian National Bank and Faculty of EconomicsUSA

Personalised recommendations