Skip to main content

Using State and Federal Claims Data to Evaluate the Patterns and Costs of Cancer Care

  • Chapter
Cancer Policy: Research and Methods

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 97))

Abstract

Not very long ago, the only codified data that resulted from a clinical encounter was a bill. The remainder of the transaction between a doctor and patient was a typed or handwritten note filed away until the next visit. Burrowing into the files to retrieve enough clinical data to permit a sophisticated outcomes analysis cost considerable time and energy relegating most of these efforts to research centers. Furthermore, the only routine reports at the population level were incidence and mortality data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nattinger A, Gottlieb M, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin J. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1102–1107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Osteen R, Steele G, Menck H, Winchester D. Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer. CA J for Clin 1992; 42:39–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu-Yao G, McLerran D, Wasson M, Wennberg J. An assessment of radical prostatectomy time trends, geographic variation and outcomes. JAMA 1993; 269(20):2633–2636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Farrow D, Hunt W, Sarnet J. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1097–1101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell J, Sunshine J. Consequences of physicians’ ownership of health care facilities-joint ventures in radiation therapy. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:1497–1501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hand R, Sener S, Imperato J, Chmiel J, Sylvester J, Fremgen A. Hospital variables associated with quality of care for breast cancer patients. JAMA 1991; 266:3429–3432.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chassin M, Kosecoff J, Park R, Winslow C, Kahn K, Merrick N, Keesey J, Fink A, Solomon D, Brook R. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? JAMA 1987; 258:2533–2537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith T, Penberthy L, Desch C, Whittemore M, Newschaffer C, Hillner B, McClish D, Retchin S. Differences in initial treatment patterns and outcomes of lung cancer in the elderly. Lung Cancer 1995; 13:235–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Desch C, Penberthy L, Smith T, Hillner B. Factors that determine the choice of prostate cancer treatment. Med Care 1996; 34:152–162.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iglehart J. Health policy report the struggle to reform Medicare. Health Policy Report 1996; 354:1071–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ICD-9 CM. Ed: Melanie C. Karaffa. 4th Ed. Los Angeles: Practice Management Information Corporation, US World Health Organization. 1992:3–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Physicians’ current procedural terminology CPT 95. 4th Ed. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1994:1–488.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hunter C, Frelick R, Feldman A, Bavier A, Dunlap W, Ford L, Henson D, MacFarlane D, Smart C, Yancik R, Yates J. Selection factors in clinical trials: Results from the Community Clinical Oncology Program Physician’s Patient Log. Cancer Treat Rep 1987; 71:559–565.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taplin S, Barlow W, Urban N, Mandelson M, Timlin D, Ichikawa L, Nefcy P. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87:417–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Newschaffer C, Penberthy L, Desch C, Retchin S. The effect of age and comorbidity of non-metastatic breast cancer in elderly women. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wajda A, Roos L, Lafefsky M, Singleton J. Record linkage strategies: Part II: Portable software and deterministic matching. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30:210–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johantgen ME. Understanding variation in the surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Richmond (VA) Virginia Commonwealth University. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Retchin S, Brown B. Management of colorectal cancer in Medicare health maintenance. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5(2): 110–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell J, Bubolz T, Paul J, Pashos C. Using Medicare claims for outcomes research. Med Care 1994;32(S7):38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Desch C, Penberthy L, Retchin S, McClish D, Smith T, Hillner B, Newschaffer C, McDonald K, Whittemore M. Evaluation of practice variations and costs for cancer. Final Report for ROI-0689-01AI. AHCPR 1994;56–79.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McBean A, Babish J, Warren J. Determination of lung cancer incidence in the elderly using Medicare claims data. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137:226–234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McBean A, Warren J, Babish J. Measuring the incidence of cancer in elderly Americans using Medicare claims data. Cancer 1994;73:2417–2425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Romano P, Roos L, Jollis J. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46:1075–1079.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Charlson i\4E, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987; 40:373–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Baker M, Kessler L, Urban N, Smucker R. Estimating the treatment costs of breast and lung cancer. Med Care 1991;29:40–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Penberthy LT, Retchin S, McDonald M, Desch C, Smith T, Hillner B. Variations in costs of cancer care for Medicare beneficiaries (Submitted HSR, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Riley G, Potosky A, Lubitz J, Kessler L. Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis. Med Care 1995; 33:828–841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Louis D, Barnes C, Jordan N, Moynihan C, Pepitone T, Spirka C, Sredl K, Westnedge J. Disease Staging: A clinically based approach to measurement of disease severity. NCHSR 1983-1:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Potosky A, Riley G, Lubitz J, Mentnech R, Kessler L. Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 1993;31:732–748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Simborg D. A new hospital-acquired disease. N Engl J Med 1981; 304:1602–1604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gardner E. UB-82 Forms offer wealth of information, misinformation. Mod Healthcare 1992; 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Whittle J, Steinberg E, Anderson G, Herbert R. Accuracy of Medicare claims data for estimation of cancer incidence and resection rates among elderly Americans. Med Care 1991;29(12): 1226–1236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McClish D, Penberthy L, Whittemore M, Newschaffer C, Woolard C, Retchin S. Ability of Medicare claims data and cancer registries to identify cancer cases and treatment. Am J Epidemiol 1996; in Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hsia D, Krushat M, Fagan A, Tebbutt J, Kusserow R. Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:352–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Iezzoni L. Using administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care: Pitfalls and potential of ICD-9-CM. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1990; 6:272–281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fisher E, Whaley F, Krushat W, Malenka D, Fleming C, Baron J, Hsia D. The accuracy of Medicare’s hospital claims data: Progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health 1992; 82:243–248.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar S, Lucey C. Patient privacy and secondary use of administrative databases. JAMA 1996;276:1137–1138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gostin LO. Lazzarini Z, Neslund VS, Osterholm Ml. Patient privacy and secondary use of administrative databases. JAMA 1996; 276:1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ballard-Barbash R, Potosky A, Harlan L, Nayfield S, Kessler L. Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:716–726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Emanuel E. Cost savings at the end of life What do the data show? JAMA 1996; 275:1907–1914.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lazovich D, White R, Thomas D, Moe R. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with Stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA 1991; 266:3433–3438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wennberg J, Roos N, Sola L, Schori A, Jaffe R. Use of claims data system to evaluate health care outcomes mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy. JAMA 1987; 257:933–936.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Christakis N, Escarce J. Survival of Medicare patients after enrollment in hospice programs. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:172–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Long S, Gibbs J, Crozier J. Medical expenditures of terminal cancer patients during the last year of life. Inquiry 1984; 21:315–327.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lubitz J, Riley G. Trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1092–1096.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Virgo K, Vemava A, Long W, McKirgan L, Johnson F. Cost of patient follow-up after potentially curative colorectal cancer treatment. JAMA 1995; 273:1837–1841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Riley G, Lubitz J. Longitudinal patterns of Medicare use by cause of death, Health Care Financing Review 1989; 11(2):1–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Riley G, Potosky A, Lubitz J, Brown M. Stage of cancer at diagnosis for Medicare HMO and fee-for-service enrollees. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:1598–1604.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Desch, C.E., Penberthy, L.T. (1998). Using State and Federal Claims Data to Evaluate the Patterns and Costs of Cancer Care. In: Bennett, C.L., Stinson, T.J. (eds) Cancer Policy: Research and Methods. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 97. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-30498-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-30498-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8203-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-30498-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics