Skip to main content

Quality of Life Research: Clinical Applications

  • Chapter
Cancer Policy: Research and Methods

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 97))

Abstract

Concern over the rising costs of health care in the United States has focused attention on the young discipline of health services research. While outcomes of disease and treatment have always been important in medical care, at least implicitly, the new discipline of health services research has broken down the concept of outcomes explicitly and developed ways to measure them. The Behavioral Model of Health Services Use (Figure 1) provides a useful conceptual framework for understanding the health care system, including the factors that influence people accessing health care, their use of health services, and health outcomes. Health outcomes include consumer satisfaction, evaluated health status, and perceived health status. Consumer satisfaction refers to patients satisfaction with their experience with the health care system. Evaluated health status represents those aspects of an individual’s health that can be observed and measured such as mortality, organ dysfunction, or disability. Perceived health status is an individual’s own perception about his or her health and how it impacts on other aspects of life. Perceived health status is used synonymously by health services researchers as health related quality of life or simply quality of life (QOL.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cella DF, Bonomi AE. Measuring QOL: 1995 update. Oncology 1995; 9(11 Suppl): 47–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. QOL assessment in cancer clinical trials. Report of the Workshop on QOL Research. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research. National Cancer Institute. July 16–17, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cella DF, Tulsky DS. QOL in Cancer: Definition, purpose and method of measurement. Cancer Invest 1993; 11(3): 327–336.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aaronson NK. QOL: What is it? How should it be measured? Oncology 1988;2(5): 69–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. “The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer.” In Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents, CM McCledo, ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1949, pp.191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greico A, Long JL. Investigation of the Karnofsky performance status as a measure of quality of life. Health Psychol 1984; 3:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sprangers MAG, Aaranson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45(7): 743–760.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martini CJ, McDowell I. Health status: Patient and physician judgments. Health Serv Res 1976; 11:508–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregoy WM. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 1988; 57:109–112.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schag CAC, Ganz PA, Wing DS, Sim M-S, Lee JJ. Quality of life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer. Qual Life Res 1994; 3:127–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE. Standards for validating health measures: Definition and content. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:473–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tulsky DS. An introduction to test theory. Oncology 1990; 4(5): 43–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganz PA, Lee JJ, Siau J. Quality of life assessment: An independent prognostic variable for survival in lung cancer. Cancer 1991; 67:3131–3135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Coates A, Gebski V, Bishop JF, Jeal PN, Woods RL, Snyder R, Tattersall MH, Byrne M, Harvey V, Gill G. Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies. N Engl J Med 1987; 17(24): 1490–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Finkelstein DM, Cassileth BR, Bonomi PD, Reckdeschel JC, Ezdinli EZ, Wolter JM. A pilot study of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) Scale for the assessment of quality of life for metastatic lung cancer patients. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol 1988; 11(6): 630–633.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayden KA, Moinpour CM, Metch B, Feigl P, O’Bryan RM, Green S, et al. Pitfalls in quality of life assessment: Lessons from a Southwest Oncology Group breast cancer clinical trial. Oncol Nurs Forum 1993; 20:1415–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt G, Walter S, and Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis 1987; 40(2): 171–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guvatt GH. Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differences. Controlled Clin Trials 1989; 10:407–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Angel. The impact of culture on the cognitive structure of illness. Cult Med Psych 1987; 11(4):465–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kagawa-Singer M. Socio-economic and cultural influences on cancer care of women. Sem One Nurs 1995; 11(2): 109–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson JR, Temple R. Food and Drug Administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs. Cancer Treatment Reports 1985; 69:1155–1157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Osoba D. The QOL Committee of the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada: Organization and functions. Qual Life Res 1992; 1:211–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. ASCO Outcomes Working Group. Outcomes of Cancer Treatment for Technology and Cancer Treatment Guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:671–679.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ganz PA, Lee JJ, Siau J. Quality of life assessment.: An independent prognostic variable for survival in lung cancer. Cancer 1991; 67:3131–3135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coscarelli Schag AC, Ganz PA, Polinsky ML, Fred C, Hirji K, and Petersen L. Characteristics of women a risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11(4):783–793.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ganz PA, Schag CAC, Lee JJ, et al. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 1992; 69:1729–1738.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschennes L. Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: A comparison of partial and total mastectomy. J Clin Epidem 1989; 42:765–771.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolberg WH, Ramosaas EP, Tanner MA, et al. Psychosexual adaptation to breast cancer surgery. Cancer 1989; 63:1645–1655.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van de Velde CJ. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: A review. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:1059–1070.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Garnick MB. Prostate cancer: Screening, diagnosis, and management. Ann Int Med 1993; 118(10):804–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lim AJ, Brandon AK, Fiedler J, Brickman AL, Boyer Cl, Raub WA, Soloway MS. Quality of life: Radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1995; 154:1420–1425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Leach GE, Brook RH. Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273(2): 129–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chodak G, Sharifi R, Kasimis B, Block NL, Macranialla E, and Kennealey GT. Single-agent therapy with bicalutamide: A comparison with medical or surgical castration in the treatment of advanced prostate carcinoma. Urology 1995; 46(6):849–855.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Coscarelli Schag CA and Heinrich RL. Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES. Oncology 1990; 4(5): 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ganz PA, Coscarelli Schag CA, Lee JJ, and Sim M-S. The CARES: a generic measure of health-related quality of life for patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1992; 1:19–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. A Coscarelli, personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reifel, J.L., Ganz, P.A. (1998). Quality of Life Research: Clinical Applications. In: Bennett, C.L., Stinson, T.J. (eds) Cancer Policy: Research and Methods. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 97. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-30498-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-30498-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8203-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-30498-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics