Advertisement

Behavior: The Impact of Ecology and Physiology

Part of the Contemporary Topics in Entomology book series (COTE, volume 2)

Abstract

Chapter 4 dealt with the mechanisms of host-plant selection by standard insects, yet many factors in the environment as well as physiological demands from within the insect influence the host choices actually made. The ecological factors include biotic elements such as interactions with other insects as well as abiotic elements, such as temperature and wind. The physiological factors include changing nutrient requirements during development, and changing preferences over shorter time intervals depending on physiological state. These influences may completely alter what an insect chooses as a host, and override basic preferences found under standard conditions. This chapter deals with the variety of external and internal factors that interact with the basic mechanisms of host-plant selection discussed in Chapter 4.

Keywords

Host Plant Food Selection Phytophagous Insect Host Choice Cabbage Butterfly 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

The hosts and the habitat

  1. Bach, C.E. 1980. Effects of plant diversity and time of colonization on an herbivore-plant interaction. Oecologia 44: 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boys, H.A. 1981. Food selection by some graminivorous Acrididae. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University, U.K.Google Scholar
  3. Carey, D.B. 1992. Factors determining host plant range in two lycaenid butterflies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  4. Chandra, S. and Williams, G. 1983. Frequency-dependent selection in the grazing behaviour of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. Ecol.Entomol. 8: 13–21.Google Scholar
  5. Cottam, D.A. 1985. Frequency-dependent grazing by slugs and grasshoppers. J.Ecol. 73: 925–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Courtney, S.P. 1984. Habitat vs foodplant selection. In Vane-Wright, R.I. and Ackery, P.R. (eds.) The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
  7. Dempster, J.P. 1982. The ecology of the cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae L. Adv.Ecol.Res. 12: 1–36.Google Scholar
  8. Ehrlich, P.R. 1984. The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations. In Vane-Wright, R.I. and Ackery, P.R. (eds.) The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
  9. Forsberg, J. 1987. Size discrimination among conspecific hostplants in two pierid butterflies: Pieris napi and Pontia daplidice. Oecologia 72: 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene, E. 1989. A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar. Science 243: 643–646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, R.E. 1977. Movement patterns and egg distribution in cabbage butterflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, R.E. 1977. Search behaviour: study of three caterpillar species. Behaviour 60: 237–259.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, R.E. 1991. Host location and oviposition on plants. In Bailey, W.J. and Ridsill-Smith, J. (eds.) Reproductive Behaviour of Insects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 108–138.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, R.E., Rienks, J., Wilson, L., Lokkers, C. and Churchill, T. 1987. Temperature, development, and survival in monophagous and polyphagous tropical pierid butterflies. Aust.J.Zool. 35: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kareiva, P.M. 1982. Experimental and mathematical analyses of herbivore movement: quantifying the influence of plant spacing and quality on foraging discrimination. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landa, K. and Rabinowitz, D. 1983. Relative preference of Arphia sulphurea for sparse and common prairie grasses. Ecology 64: 392–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leroi, B. 1977. Biocenotic relationships of the celery fly, Philophylla heraclei L.: necessary presence of complementary plants for the populations living on celery. Coll.Int.CNRS, Paris, 265: 443–454.Google Scholar
  18. Maxwell, F.G., Schuster, M.F., Meredith, W.R. and Laster, M.L. 1976. Influence of the nectariless character in cotton on harmful and beneficial insects. In Jermy, T. (ed.) The Host Plant in Relation to Insect Behaviour and Reproduction. Akademiai Kaido, Budapest, pp. 157–162.Google Scholar
  19. Raubenheimer, D. and Bernays, E.A. 1993. Patterns of feeding in the polyphagous grasshopper Taeniopoda eques: a field study. Anim.Behav. 45: 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thiery, D. and Visser, J.H. 1986. Masking of host plant odour in the olfactory orientation of the Colorado potato beetle. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 41: 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Interactions with conspecifics and other organisms

  1. Cushman J.H. and Whitham, T.G. 1991. Competition mediating the outcome of a mutualism: protective services of ants as a limiting resource for membracids. Am.Nat. 138: 851–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Damman, H. and Feeny, P. 1988. Mechanisms and consequences of selective oviposition by the Zebra swallowtail Butterfly. Anim.Behav. 36: 563–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edwards, P.J., Wratten S.D. and Gibberd, R.M. 1991. The impact of inducible phytochemicals on food selection by insect herbivores and its consequences for the distribution of grazing damage. In Tallamy, D.W. and Raupp, M.J. (eds.) Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 205–222.Google Scholar
  4. Finch, S. and Jones, T.H. 1989. An analysis of the deterrent effect of aphids on cabbage root fly (Delia radicum) egg-laying. Ecol.Entomol. 14: 387–391.Google Scholar
  5. Honda H., Ishiwatari, T. and Matsumoto, Y. 1988. Fungal volatiles as oviposition attractants for the yellow peach moth Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée)(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J.Insect Physiol. 34: 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hough-Goldstein, J.A. and Bassler, M.A. 1988. Effects of bacteria on oviposition by seedcorn maggots (Diptera:Anthomyiidae). Environ.Entomol. 17: 7–12.Google Scholar
  7. Judd, G.J.R. and Borden J.H. 1992. Aggregated oviposition in Delia antiqua: a case for mediation by semiochemicals. J.Chem.Ecol. 18: 621–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karban, R. 1991. Inducible resistance in agricultural systems. In Tallamy, D.W. and Raupp, M.J. (eds.) Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 403–419.Google Scholar
  9. Khan, Z.R. and Saxena, R.C. 1985. Behavior and biology of Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera) on tungro virus-infected rice plants: epidemiology implications. Environ. Entomol. 14: 297–304.Google Scholar
  10. Kidd, N.A.C., Lewis, G.B. and Howell, C.A. 1985. An association between two species of pine aphid, Schizolachnus pineti and Eulachnus agilis. Ecol.Entomol. 10: 427–432.Google Scholar
  11. Peterson, S.C. 1987. Communication of leaf suitablity by gregarious eastern tent caterpillars (Malacosoma americanum). Ecol.Entomol. 12: 283–289.Google Scholar
  12. Pierce, N.E. and Elgar, M.A. 1985. The influence of ants on host plant selection by Jalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. Behav.Ecol.Sociobiol. 16: 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Prokopy, RJ. and Roitberg, B.D. 1984. Foraging behavior of true fruit flies. Am.Sci. 72: 41–49.Google Scholar
  14. Purcell, A.H. and Nault, L.R. 1991. Interactions among plant pathogenic prokaryotes, plants, and insect vectors. In Barbosa, P., Krischik, V. and Jones, C.G. (eds.) Microbial Mediation of Plant-Herbivore Interactions. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 383–405.Google Scholar
  15. Raupp, M.J. and Sadof, C.S. 1991. Responses of leaf beetles in injury-related changes in their salicaceous hosts. In Tallamy, D.W. and Raupp, M.J. (eds.) Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 183–203.Google Scholar
  16. Roitberg, B.D. and Mangel, M. 1988. On the evolutionary ecology of marking pheromones. Evol.Ecol. 2: 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stamp, N.E. and Bowers, M.D. 1988. Direct and indirect effects of predatory wasps (Polistes sp.: Vespidae) on gregarious caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturniidae). Oecologia 75: 619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abiotic factors

  1. Casey, T.M. 1992. Effects of temperature on foraging of caterpillars. In N.E. Stamp and T.E. Casey (eds.) Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
  2. Hoy, C.W. and Shelton, A.M. 1987. Feeding response of Artogeia rapae and Trichoplusia ni to cabbage leafage. Environ. Entomol. 16: 680–682.Google Scholar
  3. Kamm, J.A., Fairchild, C.E., Gavin, W.E. and Cooper, T.M. 1992. Influence of celestial light on visual and olfactory behavior of seed chalcids (Hymenoptera:Eurytomidae). J.Insect Behav. 5: 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaufmann, T. 1968. A laboratory study of feeding habits of Melanoplus differentialis in Maryland. Ann.Entomol.Soc.Am. 61: 173–180.Google Scholar
  5. Lewis, T. 1965. The effect of an artificial windbreak on the distribution of aphids in a lettuce crop. Ann.Appl.Biol. 55:513–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pedgley, D. 1982. Windborne Pests and Diseases. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
  7. Shreeve, T.G. 1986. Egg-laying by the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the role of female behaviour, host abundance and temperature. Ecol.Entomol. 11: 229–236.Google Scholar
  8. Thomas, J. A., Thomas, C.D., Simcox, D.J, and Clarke, R.T. 1986. Ecology and declining status of the silver spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain. J. Appl Ecol. 23: 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Whitman, D.W. 1987. Thermoregulation and daily activity patterns in a black desert grasshopper, Taeniopoda eques. Anim.Behav. 35: 1814–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Interacting behaviors

  1. Bernays, E.A., Chapman, R.F., Leather, E.M. and McCaffery, A.R. 1977. The relationship of Zonocerus variegatus with cassava. Bull.Entomol.Res. 67: 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapman, R.F. 1957. Observations on the feeding of adults of the red locust (Nomadacris septemfasciata). Br.J.Anim.Behav. 2: 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dickens, J.C. 1989. Green leaf volatiles enhance aggregation pheromone of bollweevil, Anthonomis grandis. Entomologia Exp. Appl. 52: 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Greenfield, M.D., Shelly, T.E. and Downum, K.R. 1987. Variation in host plant quality: implications for territoriality in a desert grasshopper. Ecology 68: 828–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Stanton, M.L. 1984. Short-term learning and the searching accuracy of egg-laying butterflies. Anim.Behav. 32: 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Life-history constraints

  1. Bernays, E.A. 1992. Evolution of insect morphology in relation to plants. In Chaloner, W.G., Harper, J.L. and Lawton, J.H. (eds.) The Evolutionary Interaction of Animals and Plants. Royal Society, London, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
  2. Bernays, E.A. and Chapman, R.F. 1970a. Food selection by Chorthippus parallelus (Zetterstedt) (Orthoptera:Acrididae) in the field. J.Anim.Ecol. 39: 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernays, E.A. and Chapman, R.F. 1970b. Experiments to determine the basis of food selection by Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in the field. J. Anim.Ecol. 39: 761–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernays, E.A. and Janzen, D. 1988. Saturniid and sphingid caterpillars: two ways to eat leaves. Ecology 69: 1153–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bethke, J.A. and Parella, M.P. 1985. Leaf puncturing, feeding and oviposition behavior of Liriomyza trifolii. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 39: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braker, E. 1989. Oviposition on host plants by a tropical forest grasshopper (Microptylopteryx hebardi). Ecol.Entomol. 14:141–148.Google Scholar
  7. Claridge, M. and Wilson, M.R. 1978. Seasonal changes and alternation of food plant preference in some mesophyll-feeding leafhoppers. Oecologia 37: 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaston, K.J., Reavey, D. and Valladares, G.R. 1991. Changes in feeding habit as caterpillars grow. Ecol.Entomol. 16: 339–344.Google Scholar
  9. Godfrey, G.L., Miller, J.S. and Carter, D.J. 1989. Two mouthpart modifications in larval Notodontidae (Lepidoptera): their taxonomic distributions and putative functions. J.New York Entomol.Soc. 97: 455–470.Google Scholar
  10. Moran, N.A. and Whitham, T.G. 1988. Evolutionary reduction of complex life cycles: loss of host-alternation in Pemphigus. Evolution 42: 717–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Physiological state variables

  1. Bernays, E.A. 1985. Regulation of feeding behaviour. In Kerkut, G.A. and Gilbert, L.I. (eds.) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, vol. 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  2. Bemays, E.A. 1990. Water regulation. In Chapman, R.F. and Joern, A. (eds.) Biology of Grasshoppers. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
  3. Bernays, E.A. and Bright, K.B. 1992. Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: a review. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 104: 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernays, E.A. and Chapman, R.F. 1970. Food selection by Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in the field. J.Anim.Ecol. 39: 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernays, E.A. and Chapman, R.F. 1973. The role of food plants in the survival and development of Chortoicetes terminifera under drought conditions. Aust.J.Zool. 21: 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernays, E.A., Bright, K. Howard, J.J. and Raubenheimer, D. 1992. Variety is the spice of life: the basis of dietary mixing in a polyphagous grasshopper. Anim.Behav. 44: 721–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernays, E.A., Howard, J.J., Champagne, D. and Estesen, B. 1991. Rutin: aphagostimulant for the grasshopper Schistocerca americana. Entomologia Exp. Appl. 60: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boys, H.A. 1978. Food selection by Oedaleus senegalensis in grassland and millet fields. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 24: 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Champagne, D.and Bernays, E.A. 1991. Inadequate sterol profile as a basis of food aversion by a grasshopper. Physiol.Entomol. 16: 391–400.Google Scholar
  10. Courtney, S.P. and Kibota, T.T. 1989. Mother doesn’t know best: selection of hosts by ovipositing insects. In Bernays, E.A. (ed.) Insect Plant Interactions, vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 161–187.Google Scholar
  11. Courtney, S., Chen, G.K. and Gardner, A. 1989. A general model for individual host selection. Oikos 55:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaenike, J. and Papaj, D.R. 1992. Behavioral plasticity and patterns of host use by insects. In B.D. Roitberg and M.B. Isman (eds.) Insect Chemical Ecology. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 245–262.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, R.E. 1977. Movement patterns and egg distribution in cabbage butterflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, A.C. and Bernays, E.A. 1985. Feeding behaviour: selection of both wet and dry food for increased growth in Schistocerca gregaria nymphs. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 37: 105–112.Google Scholar
  15. Minkenberg, O.P. J.M., Tatar, M. and Rosenheim, J. A. 1992. Egg load as a major source of variability in insect foraging and oviposition behavior. Oikos 65: 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng, D. 1988. A novel level of interactions in plant-insect interactions. Nature 334: 611–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reynolds, S.E., Yeomans, M.R. and Timmins, W.A. 1986. The feeding behaviour of caterpillars (Manduca sexta) on tobacco and on artificial diet. Physiol.Entomol. 11: 39–51.Google Scholar
  18. Roessingh, P., Bernays, E.A. and Lewis, A.C. 1985. Physiological factors influencing preference for wet and dry food in Schistocerca gregaria nymphs. Entomologia Exp. Appl. 37: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simpson, S.J. and Simpson, C.L. 1989. The mechanism of nutritional compensation by phytophagous insects. In Bernays, E.A. (ed.) Insect Plant Interactions, vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 111–160.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, M.C. 1982. Quantification of host preference by manipulation of oviposition behaviour in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Oecologia 52: 224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spiller, N.J., Koenders, L. and Tjallingii, F. 1990. Xylem ingestion by aphids—a strategy for maintaining water balance. Entomologia Exp. Appl. 55: 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further reading

  1. Ahmad, S. (ed.) 1983. Herbivorous Insects: Host Seeking Behavior and Mechanisms. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, W.J. and Ridsill-Smith, J. (eds.) 1991. Reproductive Behaviour of Insects. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  3. Barbosa, P., Krischik, V. A. and Jones, C.G. (eds.) 1991. Microbial Mediation of Plant Herbivore Interactions. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bernays, E.A. and Bright, K.L. 1992. Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: a review. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 104: 125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gould, F. and Stinner, R.E. 1984. Insects in heterogeneous habitats. In Huffaker, C.B. and Rabb, R.L. (eds.) Ecological Entomology. Wiley, pp. 428–449.Google Scholar
  6. Kareiva, P. 1983. Influence of vegetation texture on herbivores. In Denno, R.F. and McClure, M.S. (eds.) Variable Plants and Animals in Natural and Managed Systems. Academic Press, New York, pp. 221–289.Google Scholar
  7. Miller, J.R. and Strickler, K.L. 1984. Finding and accepting host plants. In Bell, W. and Cardé, R. (eds.) Chemical Ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA, pp. 127–157.Google Scholar
  8. Montllor, C.B. 1988. The influence of plant chemistry on aphid feeding behavior. In Bernays, E.A. (ed.) Insect-Plant Interactions, vol. 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 125–173.Google Scholar
  9. Tallamy, D.W. and Raupp, M.J. 1991. Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Thompson, J.N. and Pellmyr, O. 1991. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. A.Rev.Entomol. 36: 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wood, D.L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. A.Rev.Entomol. 27: 411–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall, New York, NY 1994

Personalised recommendations