In selecting its host plant an insect may use a variety of senses: smell and taste, vision and touch. Probably all of these are used by most insects at some stage in the host-selection process, although, at any one stage, one sense may predominate. In this chapter we describe the physiological bases of sensory perception, concentrating on those aspects that are particularly important in host-plant selection.


Visual Pigment Optic Lobe Maxillary Palp Retinula Cell Olfactory Sensilla 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. Blaney, W.M. and Simmonds, M.S.J. 1988. Food selection in adults and larvae of three species of Lepidoptera: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Entomologia exp.appl. 49: 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaney, W.M. and Simmonds, M.S.J. 1990. A behavioural and electrophysiological study of the role of tarsal chemoreceptors in feeding by adults of Spodoptera, Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa armigera. J.Insect Physiol. 36: 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Stadler, E. 1984. Contact chemoreception. In Bell, W.J. and Cardé, R.T. (eds.), Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar

Distribution and abundance of contact chemoreceptors

  1. Chapman, R.F. 1982. Chemoreception: the significance of receptor numbers. Adv.Insect Physiol. 16: 247–356.Google Scholar
  2. Chapman, R.F. and Fraser, J. 1989. The chemosensory system of the monophagous grasshopper, Bootettixargentatus Bruner (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Int. J.Insect Morphol. & Embryol. 18: 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Variability of response

  1. Abisgold, J.D. and Simpson, S.J. 1988. The effect of dietary protein levels and haemolymph composition on the sensitivity of the maxillary palp chemoreceptors in locusts. J.Exp.Biol. 135: 215–229.Google Scholar
  2. Bernays, E.A., Blaney, W.M. and Chapman, R.F. 1972. Changes in chemoreceptor sensilla on the maxillary palps of Locusta migratoria in relation to feeding. J.Exp.Biol. 57: 745–753.Google Scholar
  3. Schoonhoven, L.M., Simmonds, M.S.J. and Blaney, W.M. 1991. Changes in the responsiveness of the maxillary styloconic sensilla of Spodoptera littoralis to inositol and sinigrin correlate with feeding behaviour during the final larval stadium. J. Insect Physiol. 37: 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Simmonds, M.S.J., Schoonhoven, L.M. and Blaney, W.M. 1991. Daily changes in the responsiveness of taste receptors correlate with feeding behaviour in larvae of Spodoptera littoralis. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 61: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Simmonds, M.S.J., Simpson, S.J. and Blaney, W.M. 1992. Dietary selection behavior in Spodoptera littoralis: the effect of conditioning diet and conditioning period on neural responsiveness and selection behaviour. J.Exp.Biol. 162: 73–90.Google Scholar
  6. Simpson, S.J., James, S., Simmonds, M.S.J. and Blaney, W.M. 1991. Variation in chemosensitivity and the control of dietary selection behaviour in the locust. Appetite 17: 141–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sensory coding

  1. Chapman, R.F., Ascoli-Christensen, A. and White, P.R. 1991. Sensory coding for feeding deterrence in the grasshopper Schistocerca americana. J.Exp.Biol. 158: 241–259.Google Scholar
  2. Dethier, V.G. and Crnjar, R.M. 1982. Candidate codes in the gustatory system of caterpillars. J.Gen.Physiol. 79: 549–569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Schoonhoven, L.M 1987. What makes a caterpillar eat? The sensory code underlying feeding behavior. In Chapman, R.F., Bernays, E.A. and Stoffolano, J.G. (eds.) Perspectives in Chemoreception and Behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 69–97.Google Scholar
  4. Schoonhoven, L.M. and Blom, F. 1988. Chemoreception and feeding behaviour in a caterpillar: towards a model of brain functioning in insects. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 49: 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The sense of smell

  1. Guerin, P.M. and Städler, E. 1982. Host odour perception in three phytophagous Diptera—a comparative study. In Visser, J.H. and Minks, A.K. (eds.) Insect-Plant Relationships. Centre for Agricultural Publishing, Wageningen, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
  2. Guerin, P.M. and Visser, J.H. 1980. Electroantennogram responses of the carrot fly, Psila rosae, to volatile plant components. Physiol.Entomol. 5: 111–119.Google Scholar
  3. Guerin, P.M., Städler, E. and Buser, H.R. 1983. Identification of host plant attractants for the carrot fly, Psila rosae. J.Chem.Ecol. 9: 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kafka, W.A. 1971. Specificity of odor-molecule interaction in single cells. In Okloff, G. and Thomas, A.F. (eds.) Gustation and Olfaction. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. Light, D.M. and Jang, E.B. 1987. Electroantennogram responses of the oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis, to a spectrum of alcohol and aldehyde plant volatiles. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 45: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ma, W.-C. and Visser, J.H. 1978. Single unit analysis of odour quality coding by the olfactory antennal system of the Colorado beetle. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 24: 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mustaparta, H. 1984. Olfaction. In Bell, W.J. and Carde, R.T. (eds.) Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 37–70.Google Scholar
  8. Visser, J.H. 1986. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. A.Rev.Entomol. 31: 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. White, P.R. and Chapman, R.F. 1990. Olfactory sensitivity of gomphocerine grasshoppers to the odours of host and non-host plants. Entomologia Exp.Appl. 55: 205–212.Google Scholar
  10. Zacharuk, R.Y. 1985. Antennae and sensilla. In Kerkut, G.A. and Gilbert, L.I. (eds.) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology vol. 6. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 1–69.Google Scholar

Distribution and abundance of olfactory sensilla

  1. Greenwood, M. and Chapman, R.F. 1984. Differences in numbers of sensilla on the antennae of solitarious and gregarious Locusta migratoria L. (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Int.J.Insect Morphol. & Embryol. 13: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Integration of olfactory inputs

  1. Hildebrand, J.G. and Montague, R.A. 1985. Functional organization of olfactory pathways in the central nervous system of Manduca sexta. In Payne, T.L., Birch, M.C. and Kennedy, C.E.J. (eds.) Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 279–285.Google Scholar

The sense of touch

  1. McIver, S.B. 1985. Mechanoreception. In Kerkut, G.A. and Gilbert, L.I. (eds.) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology vol. 6. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 71–132.Google Scholar
  2. Zacharuk, R.Y. and Albert, P.J. 1978. Ultrastructure and function of scolopophorous sensilla in the mandible of an elaterid larva (Coleoptera). Can.J.Zool. 56: 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Menzel, R. and Backhaus, W. 1991. Colour vision in insects. In Gouras, P. (ed.) The Perception of Colour. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 262–293.Google Scholar
  2. Trujillo-Cenoz, O. 1985. The eye: development, structure and neural connections. In Kerkut, G.A. and Gilbert, L.I. (eds.) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology vol. 6. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 171–223.Google Scholar
  3. White, R.H. 1985. Insect visual pigments and color vision. In Kerkut, G.A. and Gilbert, L.I. (eds.) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology vol. 6. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 431–493.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Dethier, V.G. 1976. The Hungry Fly. Harvard.Google Scholar
  2. Frazier, J.L. 1992. How animals perceive secondary plant compounds. In Rosenthal, G.A. and Berenbaum, M.R. Herbivores. Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites, vol. 2. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 89–134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall, New York, NY 1994

Personalised recommendations