Skip to main content

Abstract

In the visual arts, “representation” usually means a copy or reproduction of some original. In that context it is clear that the original is always something the representer has seen, something that is the product of ordinary visual perception. With the introduction of the term in philosophical writings, the spurious question has arisen whether or not representations could reproduce, replicate, or correspond to things-in-themselves. The question was long ago given a negative answer on logical grounds by neurophysiology. Most arguments on the topic could have been avoided if one had followed Mark Baldwin, the pioneer of cognitive psychology, and had used the term “presentation” which has the added advantage of being a viable translation of the German “Vorstellung”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumgartner, P. & Payr, S. (1995) Speaking Minds. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher, G. (1991) Made-up Minds-A Constructivist Approach to A.I. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, H. von (1973) On constructing a reality. In: Preiser, F. E. (ed.) Environmental Design Research. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, pp. 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690) An essay concerning human understanding (Fraser, A.C., ed.), Vol. 1–2. New York: Dover Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1979) Kommunikation bei Tieren. In: Peisl, A. & Mohler, A. (eds.) Der Mensch und seine Sprache. Wien: Propyläen Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyendorff, J. (1974) Byzantine Theology. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Glasersfeld, E. (1999). Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity. In: Riegler, A., Peschl, M., von Stein, A. (eds) Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46286-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-29605-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics