Advertisement

How Animals Handle Reality- The Adaptive Aspect of Representation

  • Sverre Sjölander

Abstract

A comparative look at the animal kingdom reveals that there are as many animal realities as there are basic animal types. A borderline between simple reactions and higher cognitive functions cannot be drawn, instead we find a plethora of ways of relating to reality, where the common denominator is that the methods of representation allow the animal to act in an adaptive way. Animal representation does not depiet reality-but it is a way of doing something to reality which in the long run ensures survival and reproduction. If reality is represented this way or that way, or at all, is of no importance, as long as the animal can act adoptively. It is even questionable if the concept of representation is helpful in understanding the cognition of lower animals, where interaction with reality merely consists of preprogrammed reactions devoid of understanding. Nevertheless, a focus on representation as a biological adaptation is helpful when discussing our own way of relating to reality, since the mechanisms at work must have evolved in a stone age ecology, geared at living in that particular form of reality. Some of our more notorious failures at handling our present-day world may be more easy to understand if this heritage is taken into account.

Keywords

Representational System Intentional Stance Realistic Perception Adaptive Aspect Notorious Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bischof, N. (1987) Zur Stammesgeschichte der menschlichen Kognition. Schweiz Zeitschrift für Psychologie 46: 77–90.Google Scholar
  2. Craik, K. (1943) The nature of explanation. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dennett, D. C. (1990) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Griffin, D. R. (1976) The Question of Animal Awareness. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  5. Griffin, D. R. (1984) Animal Thinking. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  6. Humphrey, N. (1986) The Inner Eye. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989) Mental Models. In: Posner M. I. (ed.) Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Klix, F. (1980) Erwachendes Denken. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  9. Lorenz K. (1941) Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie. Die angeborene Formen möglicher Erfahrung. Blätter für deutsche Philosophie 15: 94–125.Google Scholar
  10. Lorenz K. (1973) Die Rückseite des Spiegels: Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens. München:Piper.Google Scholar
  11. Mohr, H. (1983) Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akad. derWiss. 221. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  12. Oeser, E. (1987) Psychozoikum Evolution und Mechanismus der menschlichen Erkenntnisfähigkeit. Berlin: Parey.Google Scholar
  13. Piaget, J. (1954) The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Riedl, R. (1980) Biologie der Erkenntnis. Die stammesgeschichtlichen Grundlagen der Vernunft. Berlin: Parey.Google Scholar
  15. Riedl, R. (1987) Begriff und Welt. Biologische Grundlagen des Erkennens und Begreifens. Berlin: Parey.Google Scholar
  16. Simpson, G. (1963) Biology and the Nature of Science. Science 139: 81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sjölander, S. (1995) Some cognitive breakthroughs in the evolution of cogbnition and consciousness, and their impact on the biology of language. Evol. Cogn. 1:3–11.Google Scholar
  18. Stenhouse, D. (1973) The Evolution of Intelligence. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  19. Vogel, C. (1983) Prädispositionen bzw Präadaptationen derPrimatenevolution in Hinblick auf die Hominisation. In: Markl, H. (ed.) Natur und Geschichte. München: Olderbourg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sverre Sjölander
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of BiologyUniversity of LinköpingLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations