Skip to main content
  • 313 Accesses

Abstract

Adaptive behaviour research has been heralded as a new paradigm in the cognitive sciences, whose main virtue is in eschewing the notion of representation. But the assumption that this new paradigm is immune from Heideggerian critiques which have been seen to be relevant to traditional representational AI is false. Behaviour-Based ideas are in accordance with an aspect of the critique but omit to confront the nature of language. The problem is the elusiveness of the traditionary aspect of language which ultimately renders any computational cognitive science impotent. It in not only the traditional notion of representation which needs despatching, but also a related notion of reality as purely physical reality. This paper identifies common structures in contemporary thought which serve to raise the traditionary aspect of language to the fore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agre, P. E. and Chapman, D. (1987) Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity. In: Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 196–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1989) Truth and Method. Second, revised edition. London: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We LiveBy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1992) The Tree of Knowledge. Boston: Shamabala.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1994) Mind and World. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Routen, T. (1999). Habitus and Animats. In: Riegler, A., Peschl, M., von Stein, A. (eds) Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46286-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-29605-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics