Advertisement

Does Representation Need Reality?

Rethinking Epistemological Issues in the Light of Recent Developments and Concepts in Cognitive Science
  • Markus F. Peschl
  • Alexander Riegler

Abstract

This paper discusses the notion of representation and outlines the ideas and questions which led to the organization of this volume. We argue for a distinction between the classical view of referential representation, and the alternative concept of system-relative representation. The latter refers to situated cognitive processes whose dynamics are merely modulated by their environment rather than being instructed and determined by it.

Keywords

Cognitive Science Neural System Cognitive System Artificial Life Representational State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cangelosi, A., Parisi, D. & Nolfi, S. (1994) Cell division and migration in a genotype for neural networks. Network: computation in neural systems 5(4): 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clancey, W. J. (1997) Situated Cognition. On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dreyfus, H. L. & Dreyfus, S. E. (1988) Making a Mind versus Modelling the Brain: Artificial Intelligence Back at a Branch-Point. Artificial Intelligence 117: 309–33.Google Scholar
  4. Elman, J. et al. (1996) Rethinking innateness. A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fodor, J. A. (1981) Representations: philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fodor, J. A. & Pylyshin, Z. W. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 20. Reprinted in: Beakley, B. et al. (eds.) (1992) The philosophy of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gelder, T. von (1992) Defining “distributed representation”. Connection Science 4(3/4): 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glasersfeld, E. von (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick, P. (ed.) The invented reality. New York: Norton, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
  9. Glasersfeld, E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986) Distributed representations. In: Rumelhart, D.E. & McClelland, J. L. (eds.) Parallel Distributed Processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Foundations, Volume I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 77–109.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.) Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1979) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
  13. Peschl, M. F. (1997) The Representational Relation Between Environmental Structures and Neural Systems: Autonomy and Environmental Dependency in Neural Knowledge Representation. Non-linear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 1(2): 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Riegler, A. (1994) Constructivist Artificial Life: The constructivist-anticipatory principle and functional coupling. In: Hopf, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 18th German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI-94) Workshop on Genetic Algorithms within the Framework of Evolutionary Computation. Max-Planck-Institute Report No. MPI-I-94-241, pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
  15. Riegler, A. (1997) Ein kybernetisch-konstruktivistisches Modell der Kognition. In: Müller, A., Müller, K. H. & Stadler, F. (eds.) Konstruktivismus und Kognitionswissenschaft. Kulturelle Wurzeln und Ergebnisse. Wien, New York: Springer, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
  16. Roth, G. (1994) Das Gehirn und seine Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  17. Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, McClelland, J. L. & Hinton, G. E. (1986) Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In: McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (eds.) Parallel Distributed Processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Psychological and biological models, Volume II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 7–57.Google Scholar
  18. Smolensky, P. (1988) On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stadler, M. & Kruse, P. (1990) Über Wirklichkeitskriterien. In: Riegas, V. & Vetter, C. (eds.) Zur Biologie der Kognition. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 133–158.Google Scholar
  20. Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus F. Peschl
    • 1
  • Alexander Riegler
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. for Philosophy of ScienceUniv. of ViennaWienAustria
  2. 2.CLEAFree University BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations