Advertisement

Valve surgery for regurgitant lesions of the aortic or mitral valves in advanced left ventricular dysfunction

  • Robert O. Bonow
  • Roy G. Masters
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 225)

Abstract

Cardiologists and cardiac surgeons frequently must decide when it is appropriate to offer early surgical intervention to prevent compromise of left ventricular function from regurgitant lesions of the aortic or mitral valve. Both aortic and mitral regurgitation place a volume load on the left ventricle leading to dilatation and eventually impairment of left ventricular systolic function. This chapter however deals with the opposite issue: that of late surgical intervention after deterioration of left ventricular systolic function has occurred and reached advanced levels. Important questions to consider include (1) whether surgical intervention is contraindicated once advanced left ventricular dysfunction has become established (2) whether the risks of surgery are too high in this setting and (3) whether, even after successful surgery, improvements in left ventricular function, symptoms, or survival can realistically be anticipated.

Keywords

Mitral Valve Valve Replacement Mitral Regurgitation Aortic Valve Replacement Aortic Regurgitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bonow RO. Management of chronic aortic regurgitatton. N Engl J Med 1994;331:736–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scognamiglio R, Rahimtoola S, Fasoli G et al. Nifedipine in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function. N Engl J Med 1994;331:689–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forman R, Firth BF, Barnard MS. Prognostic significance of pre-operative left ventriculaar ejection fraction and valve lesion in patients with aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:1120–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonow RO, Picone AL, McIntosh CL et al. Survival and functional results after valve replacement for aortic regurgitation from 1976–1983: Impact of preoperative left ventricular function. Circulation 1985;72:1244–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohn PF, Gorlin R, Cohn LH et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction as a prognostic guide in surgical treatment of coronary and valvular heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1974; 34:136–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Copeland JG, Griepp RB, Stinson EB et al. Long-term follow-up after isolated aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 74:875–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greves J, Rahimtoola SH, McAnulty JH et al. Preoperative criteria predictive of late survival following valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation. Am Heart J 1981; 101:300–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonow RO: Radionuclide angiography in the management of aortic regurgitation. Circulation 1991;84(Suppl 1): I-296–302.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross J Jr. Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: Implications for surgical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5:811–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ross J Jr. Afterload mismatch and preload reserve. A conceptual framework for the analysis of ventricular function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1976; 18:255–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonow RO, Lakatos E, Maron BJ et al. Serial long-term assessment of the natural history of asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Circulation 1991; 84:1625–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonow RO, Rosing DR, Kent KM et al. Timing of operation for chronic aortic regurgitation Am J Cardiol 1982; 50:325–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daniel WG, Hood WP Jr, Siart A et al. Chronic aortic regurgitation: Reassessment of the prognostic value of preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension and fractional shortening. Circulation 1985; 71:669–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fioretti P, Roelandt J, Bos RJ et al. Echocardiography in chronic aortic insufficiency: Is valve replacement too late when left ventricular end-systolic dimension reaches 55 mm? Circulation 1983; 67:216–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gaasch WH, Andrias CW, Levine HJ. Chronic aortic regurgitation: The effect of aortic valve replacement on left ventricular volume, mass, and function. Circulation 1978; 58:825–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gaasch WH, Carroll JD, Herbert HJ et al. Chronic aortic regurgitation: Prognostic value of left ventricular end-systolic dimension and end-diastolic radius/thickness ratio. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1:775–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bonow RO, Dodd JT, Maron BJ et al. Long-term serial changes in left ventricular function and reversal of ventricular dilatation after valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation. Circulation 1988; 78:1108–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michel PL, Iung B, Jaoude SA et al. The effect of left ventricular systolic function on long term survival in mitral and aortic regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 4(Supp II):S160–169.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klodas E, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ et al. Aortic regurgitation complicated by extreme left ventricular dilation long-term outcome after surgical correction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27:670–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bonow RO, Nikas D, Elefteriades JA. Valve replacement for regurgitant lesions of theaortic or mitral valve in advanced left ventricular dyefunction. In: Cardiology Clinics 1995; Volume 13: WB Saunders, Toronto.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wisenbaugh T, Spann JF, Carabello BA. Differences in myocardial performance and load between patients with similar amounts of chronic aortic versus chronic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3:916–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bonow RO. The value of radioisotope blood pool imaging for evaluation of valvular heart disease. In Comparative Cardiac Imaging 1990; Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gaasch WH, Zile MR. Lett ventricular function after surgical correction of chronic mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J 1991; 12(Suppl B):48–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hansen DE, Cahill PD, DeCampli WM et al. Valvular-ventricular interaction: Importance of the mitral apparatus in canine left ventricular systolic performance. Circulation 1986; 73:1310–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hilder FJ, Javier RP, Cohen LS. Myocardial dysfunction associated with valvar heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1972; 30:319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rozich JD, Carabello BA, Usher BW et al. Mitral valve replacement with and without chordal preservation in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation: Mechanisms for differences in postoperative ejection performance. Circulation 1992; 86:1718–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schuler G, Peterson KL, Johnson A. Temporal response of left ventricular performance to mitral valve surgery. Circulation 1979; 59:1218–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tyers G. Mitral valve replacement: What should be the standard technique? Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49:861–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Phillips UR, Levine FH, Carter JE et al. Mitral valve replacement for isolated mitral regurgitation: Analysis of clinical course and late postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 1981; 48:647–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ, Schaff HV et al. Echocardiographic prediction of survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1994; 90:830–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yun KL, Rayhill SC, Niczyporuk MA et al. Mitral valve replacement in dilated canine hearts with chronic mitral regurgitation: Importance of the mitral subvalvular apparatus Circulation 1991; 84(Suppl 3):112–24.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lillehei CW, Levy MJ, Bonnabeau RC. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of papillary muscles and chordae tendineae. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1964; 47:532–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarris GE, Cahill PD, Hansen DE et al. Restoration of left ventricular systolic performance after reattachment of the mitral chordae tendineae. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 95:969–79.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moon MR, DeAnda A, Daughters GT, et al. Experimental evaluation of different chordal preservation methods during mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58:931–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yun KL, Farm JI, Rayhill S et al. Importance of the mitral subvalvular apparatus for left ventricular segmental systolic mechanics. Circulation 1990; 82(5 Suppl):IV89–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yun KL, Niczyporuk MA, Sams GE et al. Importance of mitral subvalvular apparatus in terms of cardiac-energetics and systolic mechanics in the ejecting canine heart. J Clin Invest 1991; 87:247–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    David TK, Uden DE, Strauss HD. The importance of the mitral apparatus in left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1983; 68(Suppl II):1176–82.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Goldman ME, Mora F, Guarino T et al. Mitral valvuloplasty is superior to valve replacement for preservation of left ventricular function: An intraoperative two-dimensional echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10:568–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hennein HA, Swain JA, McIntosh CL et al. Comparative assessment of chordal preservation versus chordal resection during mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 99:828–37.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Horstkotte D, Schulte HD, Bircks W et al. The effect of chordal preservation on late outcome after mitral valve replacement: A randomized study. J Heart Valve Dis 1993:2:150–8.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Miki S, Kusuhara K, Ueda Y et al. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. Ann Thorac Surg 1988; 45:28–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carpentier A, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN et al. Reconstructive surgery of mitral valve incompetence: Ten year appraisal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 79:338–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cosgrove DM, Stewart WJ: Mitral valvuloplasty. Curr Probl Cardiol 1989; 7:355–415.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kaul TK, Ramsdale DR, Meek D et al. Mitral valve replacement in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and impaired left ventricular function. Int J Cardiol 1992; 35:169–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yacoub M, Halin M, Radley-Smith R et al. Surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation caused by floppy valves: Repair versus replacement. Circulation 1981; 64(Suppl II):II-210–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert O. Bonow
  • Roy G. Masters

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations