Advertisement

The Tripartite Division of French Social Science: A Long-Term Perspective

  • Johan Heilbron
Part of the Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook book series (SOSC, volume 15)

Abstract

If even the most autonomous disciplines owe some of their characteristics to the context in which they develop, and if this context is characterized at least partly by relations with other disciplines, the question arises as to how one could define the set of interdisciplinary relationships that has been most pertinent to the development of the social sciences.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Seventeenth Century Political Theory Human Science Moral Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    W. Lepenies, Die drei Kulturen. Soziologie zwischen Literatur und Wissenschaft, München, Carl Hanser Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    For a general overview of political science, see P. Favre, “Histoire de la science politique”, in M. Grawitz & J. Leca (eds.), Tratéi de science politique, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1985, vol. I, pp. 3–45. I have furthermore relied on J. Heilbron, Sociologie in Frankrijk. Een historische schets, Amsterdam, SISWO, 1983, and id., Over het ontstaan van de Franse sociologie (1750–1850), Amsterdam, 1990 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Maier, Die ältere deutsche Staats-und Verwaltungslehre, München, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1980, pp. 281–288.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Denzer, Moralphilosophie und Naturrecht bei Samuel Pufendorf, München, C.H. Beck, 1972, pp. 296–300.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.W.B. Brockliss, French higher education in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987, pp. 331–333.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Q. Skinner, Foundations of modern political thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.R. Kelley, Foundations of modern historical scholarship. Language, law and history in the French Renaissance, New York, Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.F. Church, “The decline of the French jurists as political theorists, 1660–1789”, French historical studies, 5, 1967, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    On the process of state formation see N. Elias, Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen (1939), Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1981. On the role of the jurists see P. Bourdieu, La noblesse d’Etat. Grandes écoles et esprit de corps, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1989, pp. 533–559.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quoted by W.F. Church, “The decline of the French jurists as political theorists” (note 8).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    On these academies see A. Viala, Naissance de l’écrivain. Sociologie de la littératwre à l’âge classique, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1985, pp. 15–50.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Janet, Histoire de la science politique dans ses rapports avec la morale (1858), Paris, Alcan, 1913, Volume II, p. 307.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Portemer, “Recherches sur l’enseignement du droit public au XVIIIe siècle”, Revue historique du droit français et étranger, 37, 1959, pp. 341–397.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    See G. Thuillier, L’ENA avant l’ENA, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Roche, Le siècle des lumières en province. Académies et académiciens provinciaux, 1680–1789, Paris, Mouton & Cie., 1978, volume I, p. 102.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    See for example N.O. Keohane, Philosophy and the state in France. From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.O. Kristeller, Renaissance thought II, New York, Harper & Row, 1965, pp. 20–68.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    See the remarks in N. Elias, Die höfische Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1983, pp. 159–168.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.-J. Martin, Livre, pouvoirs et société à Paris au XVIIe siècle (1598–1701), Genève, Droz, 1969, pp. 826–830 and 1074. On the moralists see A. Levi, French moralists. The theory of the passions, 1585 to 1649, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1964; L. van Delft, Le moraliste classique. Essai de définition et de typologie, Genève, Droz, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Nietzsche, “Jenseits von Gut und Böse” (par. 254), in Werke. Herausgegeben von K. Schlechta, Frankfurt am Main, Ullstein, 1979, volume II, pp. 721–23. Similar remarks in “Menschliches, Allzumenschliches” (par. 35 and 214), in ibid., volume I.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.O. Hirschman, The passions and the interests, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1977. For a detailed study of the notion of amour-propre see H.-J. Fuchs, Entfremdung und Narzissmus. Semantische Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der “Selbstbezogenheit” als Vorgeschichte von französisch “amour-propre”, Stuttgart, J.B. Metzler, 1977.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Voltaire, “Essai sur les moeurs” (1756), in Oeuvres complètes, Paris, Hachette, 1876, volume X, p. 43.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    For this theme see R. Koselleck, Kritik und Krise. Eine Studie zur Pathogenese der bürgerlichen Welt, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1973.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    On this tendency see E.C. Ladd, “Helvétius and Holbach: ‘la moralisation de la politique’”, Journal of the history of ideas, 23, 1962, pp. 221–238. For the context see A.C. Kors, d’Holbach’s coterie. An Englightenment in Paris, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    See P. Favre, “Les sciences de l’Etat entre déterminisme et libéralisme, Emile Boutmy (1835–1906) et la création de l’Ecole libre des sciences politiques”, Revue française de sociologie, 22, 1981, pp. 429–465; D. Damamme, “Genèse sociale d’une institution scolaire: l’Ecole libre des sciences politiques”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 70,1987, pp. 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Bourdieu, La noblesse d’Etat. Grandes écoles et esprit de corps, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1989, esp. pp. 183–264.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    See P. Favre, “L’absence de la sociologie politique dans les classifications durkheimiennes des sciences sociales”, Revue française de science politique, 32, 1982, pp. 5–31. On the strategic aspects of durkheimian sociology see V. Karady, “Stratégies de réussite et mode de faire-valoir de la sociologie chez les durkheimiens”, Revue française de sociologie, 20, 1979, pp. 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. Braudel, Ecrits sur l’histoire, Paris, Flammarion, 1969, p. 7.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    On the traditional notion of economics see O. Brunner, “Das ‘ganze Haus’ und die alteuropäische Ökonomik”, in Neue Wege der Sozialgeschichte, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1956, pp. 33–61.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J.-Cl. Perrot, “Economie politique”, in Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grunbegriffe in Frankreich, 1680–1810, München, Oldenbourg, 1988, Heft 8, pp. 51–104; id., “Nouveautés: l’économie politique et ses livres”, in H.-J. Martin & R. Chartier, Histoire de l’édition française, Paris, Promodis, 1984, volume II, pp. 240–257.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    On the physiocrates see E. Fox-Genovese, The origins of physiocracy. Economic revolution and social order in eighteenth-century France, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    On economics in the nineteenth century see L. Le Van-Lemesle, “La promotion de l’économie politique en France au XIXe siècle jusqu’ à son introduction dans les facultés (1815–1881)”, Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 27, 1980, pp. 270–294; C. Bidard, L’autonomisation du champ de la théorie économique, Thèse de 3e cycle, Université de Paris VIII, 1978; H. Dumez, Walras ou l’émergence de l’économie mathématique, Thèse de 3e cycle, Université de Paris IV, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Heilbron

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations