Advertisement

The Social Science Disciplines: The American Model

  • Peter T. Manicas
Part of the Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook book series (SOSC, volume 15)

Abstract

A persistent assumption of disciplinary histories of the social sciences is the idea that each of the main branches of today’s social sciences reflects at least reasonably firm strata of the social world. There is, thus, a ‘natural’ division of labor which was finally realized with the maturation of the distinct social sciences. Explaining the emergence of the disciplines, then, takes the form of showing how pathfinders, interested in constituting analogues to the successful modern natural sciences, broke from the prescientific past and established restricted domains for controlled inquiry. Each story is different, of course, and some are stormier than others. Some, for example psychology, are even less settled than others (1).

Keywords

Political Economy American Model Social Science Discipline American Economic Association Educational Manager 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, P. 1968. The Origins of British Sociology: 1834–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Gay Wilson. 1967. William James: A Biography. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  3. Bannister, Robert C. 1987. Sociology and Scientism: The Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Ernest. 1971. The Lost Science of Man. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, L.L., and Bernard, Jessie. 1943. Origins of American Sociology: The Social Science Movement in the United States. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, Morris. 1962. A History of Cornell. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bledstein, Burton. 1976. The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Boring, E.G. 1929. A History of Experimental Psychology. 2nd Edition. 1950. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  9. Danziger, Kurt. 1979. “The Positivists Repudiation of Wundt,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15.Google Scholar
  10. Darnell, Regna. 1970. “The Professionalization of American Anthropology: A Case Study in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Microfiche of typescript, Brooklyn, N.Y.Google Scholar
  11. Diamond, S. 1980. “Wundt Before Leipzig.” In R.E. Reiber (ed.)., Wilhelm Wundt and the Making of a Scientific Psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  12. Dorfman, Joseph. 1949. The Economic Mind in American Civilization: 1865–1918, 3 Vols. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  13. Fans, Robert E.L. 1967. Chicago Sociology, 1920–1932. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
  14. Furner, Mary O. 1975. Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis of Professionalization of American Social Science, 1905–1965. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  15. Gruber, Carol S. 1975. Mars and Minerva: World War I and the Uses of the Higher Learning in America. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hale, Matthew Jr. 1980. Human Science and Social Order: Hugo Munsterberg and the Origins of Applied Psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Haskell, Thomas L. 1977. The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth Century Crisis of Authority. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Helmholtz, Hermann. 1971. Selected Writings, Russell Kahn (ed.). Middleton: Wesleyan University.Google Scholar
  19. Herbst, Jurgen. 1965. The German Historical School in American Scholarship. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Higham, John, Krieger, L., and Gilbert, F. 1965. History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hilgard, Ernest R. (ed.). 1978. American Psychology in Historical Perspective. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  22. Iggers, George G. 1983. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present. Middleton: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  23. James, William. 1950. The Principles of Psychology, 2 Vols. New York: Dover. First published in 1890.Google Scholar
  24. Karl, Barry D. 1974. Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kolko, Gabriel. 1967. The Triumph of Conservatism. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
  26. Leary, D. 1979. “Wundt and After: Psychology’s Shifting Relations with the Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and Philosophy,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 13.Google Scholar
  27. Lowie, Robert H. 1937. The History of Ethnological Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  28. Mach, Ernst. 1959. The Analysis of Sensations. New York: Dover. First published in 1883.Google Scholar
  29. Manicas, Peter T. 1987. A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Manicas, Peter T. 1988. “Pragmatic Philosophy of Science and the Charge of Scientism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Vol. XXTV,No. 4.Google Scholar
  31. Manicas, Peter T. 1989. “Explanation and Quantification.” In Barry Glassner and Jonathan Moreno (eds.), The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  32. Manicas, Peter T. 1989. War and Democracy. Oxford and New York: Basil Black-well.Google Scholar
  33. Manicas, Peter T. 1990. “Modest Realism, Experience and Evolution.” In Roy Bhaskar (ed.), Realism and Social Being. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Margolis, J. Manicas, P.T., Harre, R., and Secord, P.F. Psychology: Designing the Discipline. New York and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Matthews, Fred H. 1977. Quest for an American Sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago School. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  36. McClelland, Charles E. 1980. State, Society and the University in Germany, 1700–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mill, John Stuart. 1974. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. 2nd. Edition. Clifton, N.J.: Augustus Kelly. First published in 1844.Google Scholar
  38. Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Mills, C. Wright. 1964. Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  40. Mitchell, Wesley Clair. 1969. Types of Economic Theory: From Mercantilism to Institutionalism, Joseph Dorfman (ed.). Reprint. New York: Augustus Kelly.Google Scholar
  41. O’Connor, Michael J.L. 1944. Origins of Academic Economics in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Passmore, John. 1966. A Hundred Years of Philosophy. Rev. ed. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  43. Perry, Ralph Barton. 1935. The Thought and Character of William James. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  44. Ringer, Fritz. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890–1933. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Robinson, James Harvey. 1912. The New History. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Samelson, Franz. 1979. “Putting Psychology on the Map: Ideology and Intelligence Testing.” In A.R. Buss (ed.), Psychology in a Social Context. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  47. Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sarason, Seymour B. 1981. Psychology Misdirected. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Saveth, Edward N. 1974. American History and Social Science. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Silva, Edward T., and Slaughter, Sheila A. 1984. Serving Power: The Making of the Academic Social Science Expert. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  51. Small, Albion. 1924. Origins of Sociology. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
  52. Somit, Albert, and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1967. The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  53. Veblen, Thorstein. 1957. The Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Businessmen. New York: Sagamore. First published in 1918.Google Scholar
  54. Veblen, Thorstein. 1961. The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
  55. Veysey, Lawrence R. 1965. The Emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Weinstein, James. 1968. The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  57. Woodward, William. 1984. “William James’s Psychology of Will: Its Revolutionary Impact on American Psychology.” In Brozek, Josef (ed.). 1984. Explorations in the History of Psychology in the United States. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter T. Manicas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations