Abstract
Greenstone’s (1969) thesis held that labor’s consumer interests increasingly took precedence over its earlier concern with its economic well-being. Labor now speaks both for its members and for all consumers as a class. This thesis raises questions about class similarities and differences between union members and consumers. Where labor unions have organized most of a nation’s labor force as in Scandinavia, union officials can justifiably claim to speak for the nation’s workers and consumers. But labor officials often make this claim even when union members are not representative of the nation’s consumers. Thus, U.S. labor leaders routinely state that their political aims are not selfish but are designed to help the working class, the middle class, and consumers in general. Labor’s opponents question this claim and insist that labor has become a smaller special interest group that speaks only for itself.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(1995). Labor as a Changing Social Class. In: Segmented Labor, Fractured Politics. Springer Studies in Work and Industry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28764-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28764-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45031-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-28764-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive