Abstract
Prescription management for patients on renal replacement therapy requires consideration of a wide range of interrelated conditions including dialysis therapy, medications for co-morbid conditions and nutrition. Optimal outcomes cannot be achieved by focusing on solute clearances alone because outcomes are dependent on a constellation of factors related to control of the patient’s disease. Hence, the adequacy of dialysis involves attention to controling co-morbid conditions as well as correction of the consequences of renal failure. Table 22.1 contains a partial list of the components of adequacy in renal replacement therapy. While dialysis addresses many of these components, additional measures are necessary to attain optimal outcomes. Blood pressure control, improved anemia, and better calcium-phosphate metabolism are achievable through adequate dialysis prescription, but additional antihypertensive therapy, erythropoietin administration and increased vitamin D intake are essential for optimal care. Thus, while the present chapter focuses on the elements of dialysis prescription management, the recommendations discussed herein must always be taken in the context of overall patient management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blake P, Burkart JM, Churchill DN, Daugirdas J, Depner T, Hamburger RJ et al. Recommended clinical practices for maximising peritoneal dialysis clearances. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16:448–56.
Burkhart JM, Schreiber M, Korbet SM, Churchill DN, Hamburger RJ, Moran J et al. Solute clearance approach to adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16:457–70.
DuBois D and DuBois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1961; 17:863–71.
Churchill DN, Taylor DW and Keshaviah PK. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes, Canada-USA (CANU-SA) peritoneal dialysis study group. J Am Soc Naphrol 1996; 7:198–207.
Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD, Khanna R et al. Peritoneal equilibration test. Petit Dial Bull 1987; 7:138–47.
Durand P, Chanliau J, Gamberoni J, Hestin D and Kessler M. Measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure: a necessary routine test in peritoneal dialysis Perit Dial Int 1996: 16:S84–7.
Piraiao B, Bernardini J, Sarkar S, Johnsion J and Fried L, JI, exchange volumes are tolerated by most PD patients. Perit Dial Int 1998; 18:S22.
Wang T, HeimbĂ¼rgar O, Wamewski J, Bergström J and Lindhoim B. Time dependence of solute removal during a single exchange. Adv Perit Dial 1997; 13: 23–8.
Wang T, Waniewski J, Heimburger O, Werynski A and Lindholm B. A quantitative analysis of sodium transport and removal during peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1997, 52:1609–16.
Mistry CD, Gokai R, Peers E and the MIDAS study group. A. randomized rnulticenter clinical trial comparing isosmolar icodextrin with hyperosmolar glucose solutions in CAPD. Kidney Int 1994; 46:496–503.
Vonesh E, Burkart J, McMurray S and Williams P. Peritoneal dialysis kinetic modeling: validation in a multicenter clinical study. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16:471–81.
Jones MR. Etiology of severe malnutrition: results of an international cross-sectional study in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 23:412–20.
Kopple JD and Blumenkrantz MJ. Nutritional requirements for patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1983; 24:S295–302.
Bergström J et al. Protein and energy intake, nitrogen losses in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1993; 44:1048–57.
Enia G, Sicuso C, Alati G and Zoccali C. Subjective global assessment of nutrition in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transp 1993; 8:1094–8.
Oreopoulos DG, Anderson GH, Bergström J et al. Nutritional assessment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: an international study. Am J Kidney Dis 1991; 17:462–71.
Wilkie ME. Icodextrin 7.5% dialysate solution in patients with ultrafiltration failure: extension of CAPD technique survival. Perit Dial Int 1997; 17:84–6.
Tebeau J, Moran J, Vonesh E and Harter M. Improvements in delivered dose utilizing a prescription management process. Perit Dial Int 1998; 18:S23.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Villano, R., Dunham, T., Mujais, S. (1999). The critical role of prescription management in a peritoneal dialysis program. In: Henderson, L.W., Thuma, R.S. (eds) Quality Assurance in Dialysis. Developments in Nephrology, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28312-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28312-8_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5281-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-28312-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive