Quality of life assurance in hemodialysis

  • Robert Lindsay
Part of the Developments in Nephrology book series (DINE, volume 39)


To physicians who are concerned with the impact that end-stage renal disease and hemodialysis have on the day-to-day life and psychological well-being of patients and their families, a major part of the “quality” in quality assurance consists of patient quality of life.


Dialysis Patient Patient Quality Muscle Cramp Physiological Index Dialysis Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Calland CH. Iatrogenic problems in end-stage renal failure. N Engl J Med 1972; 287:334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell A, Converse PE and Rodgers WL. The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Converse PE, Dotson JD, Hoag WJ and McGee WH III. American social attitudes data sourcebook. 1947–1978. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell A. The sense of well-being in America: recent patterns and trends. New York, McGraw-Hill. 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fries JF and Spitz PW. The hierarchy of patient outcomes. In Spilker B, editor. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York, Raven Press, Ltd., 1990; 25–35.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schipper H, Clinch J and Powell V. Definitions and conceptual issues. In Spilker B, editor. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York, Raven Press. Ltd., 1990; 11–24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guyatt GH, Bombardier C and Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ 1986; 134:889–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J et al. The QL-Index. J Chronic Dis 1981; 34:585–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Churchill DN, Torrance D, Taylor DW, Barnes CC. Ludwin D, Shimizu A et al. Measurement of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach. Clin Invest Med 1987; 10:14–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB et al. The sickness impact profile. Med Care 1981; 19:787–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morrow GR, Chiarello RJ and Derogatis LR. A new scale for assessing patients’ adjustment to medical illness. Psychol Med 1978; 8:605–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guyatt GH and Jaeschke R. Measurements in clinical trials: choosing the appropriate approach. In Spilker B, editor. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York, Raven Press, Ltd., 1990; 37–46.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindsay RM. A comparison of CAPD and haemodialysis in adaptation to home dialysis. In Moncreith J and Popovich R, editors. CAPD ipdate — continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Masson, NY, Modern Problems in Kidney Disease, 1981; 171–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindsay RM, Oreopoulos D, Burton H, Conley J, Richmond J and Wells G. The effect of treatment modality (CAPD vs. haemodialysis) in adaptation to home dialysis. In Atkins RC, Thomson NM and Farrell PC, editors. Proceedings of the Pan Pacific conference on peritoneal dialysis. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1981: 385–94.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindsay RM, Richmond J, Burton H, Conley J, Clark WF and Linton AL. Is home dialysis too stressful? Controv Nephrol 1981; 3:395–405.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wai L, Richmond J, Burton HJ and Lindsay RM. The influence of psychosocial factors on survival of home dialysis patients. Lancet 1981; 2; 1155–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richmond JM, Linday RM, Burton HJ, Conley J and Wai L. Psychological and physiological factors predicting the outcome on home haemodialysis. In Cluthe R, editor. Clinical nephrology. Frieburg, Germany, 1982; 109–13.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burton HJ, Kline SA, Lindsay RM and Heidenheim AP. The relationship of depression to survival in chronic renal failure. Psychosom Med 1986; 48:261–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lindsay RM. Comparison of patient quality of life in short dialysis and conventional dialysis. In: Man NK, Mion C and Henderson LW, editors. Blood purification in perspective: new insights and future trends. ISAIO Press, 1987; 203–4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lindsay RM, Heidenheim AP, Spanner E, Burton HJ, Lindsay S and LeFebvre JMJ. A multi-centre study of short hours (SH) dialysis using AN69S: preliminary results. ASAIO Transactions 1991; 37:M465–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heidenheim AP and Lindsay RM. The impact of erythropoietin and dialyzer geometry on patient quality of life. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindsay RM and Heidenheim AP. Measurement of quality of life in international trials involving dialysis patients and the use of recombinant human erythropoietin. In Bauer C, Koch K, Scigalla P and Wieczorek L, editors. Clinical applications of erythropoietin. New York, Marcel Dekker Inc., 1993;81–921.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strauch MR, Lipke R, Schafheutle R, Nachbauer B and Stauch-Rahaüser G. A standardized list of somatic criteria for comparative assessment of regular dialysis therapy patients. Artif Organs 1978; 2:370–2.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jackson DJ. The basic personality inventory. Port Huron, Michigan, Research Psychologists Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nunally JC. Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carmines EG and Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, 1979.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Selltiz C, Wrightsman LS and Cook SW. Research methods in social relations, 3rd edn. New York, Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Helmstadter GC. Principles of psychological measurements. New York, Appleton-Centory-Crofts, 1964.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lemke E and Wiersma W. Principles of psychological measurement. Chicago, Rand McNally, 1976.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spilker B. Introduction. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. Spilker B, editor. New York, Raven Press, 1990; 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Lindsay

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations