My Right to Care for my Health — And What About the Needy and the Elderly?
It has become very popular to apply the highly inflated language of rights in addressing issues of personal health status and of priorities in allocation of taxpayer’s resources. Such an intellectual and political fashion fad, however, seems to have little or no basis in our everyday and common sense approach to health and health care . Whenever I personally think about health, apart from those intellectual debates and public policy discussions, it is not the term “right”, nor the term “obligation”, nor “resource” that comes to mind first. I feel I have a responsibility to take care of my health. It is not only an asset; it is an end in itself, inasmuch as its absence or deterioration is painful, harmful, fatal. It is also a commodity, a precondition, which I use to achieve other goals in life: satisfaction, social integration, love, reputation, power, contribution to the common good, and working hard. I am using health as a means; I might trade it for other values, assets, or valuables, according to personal choice or milieu. Protecting or improving or trading health, its quantitative length as well as its qualitative standard, is a result of living, of voluntarily or involuntarily making decisions, choosing, managing risks. Health is a risk factor in life; I therefore deal with it appropriately when using the arts and sciences of risk analysis, risk assessment, and risk management. It seems to me that the risk language is more appropriate to deal with issues of personal health care as well as of health policy than the rights language [13, 15].
KeywordsResponsibility Approach Personal Health Care Catastrophic Illness Responsibility Principle Common Sense Approach
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Buchanan, A.: 1985, Ethics, Efficiency and the Market, Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- 2.Daniels, N.: 1991, ‘Equal Opportunity and Health Care Rights for the Elderly’, in this volume, 201–212.Google Scholar
- 3.Enthoven, A.: 1980, Health Plan: The Only Practical Solution to the Soaring Cost of Medical Care, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- 4.Engelhardt, H.T. Jr.: 1986, The Foundations of Bioethics, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- 5.Fried, C: 1976, ‘Equality and Health Care’, Hastings Center Report 6, 29–34.Google Scholar
- 6.Havighurst, C: 1982, Deregulating the Health Care Industry, Ballinger Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- 7.Herder-Dorneich, P.: 1983, Ordnungstheorie des Sozialstaates, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
- 8.Moskop, J.C.: 1983, ‘Rawlsian Justice and Human Right to Health Care’, The Journal of Philosophy and Medicine 8, 329–338.Google Scholar
- 9.President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1983, Securing Access to Health Care, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (Vol. 1: Report; Vol. 2: Sociocultural and Philosophical Studies; Vol. 3: Empirical, Legal and Conceptual Studies).Google Scholar
- 10.Reiser, S.J.: 1983, ‘Responsibility for Personal Health: A Historic Perspective’, The Journal of Philosophy and Medicine 8, 7–17.Google Scholar
- 11.Rhoden, N.K.: 1980, ‘The Right to Refuse Psychotropic Drugs’, Harvard Civil Liberties Review 15, 363–413.Google Scholar
- 12.Rhoden, N.K.: 1991, ‘Free Markets, Consumer Choice and the Poor’, in this volume, 213–241.Google Scholar
- 13.Sass, H.M.: 1985, Verantwortung unter Risiko, Köllen Druck und Verlag, Alfter-Ödekoven.Google Scholar
- 14.Sass, H.M.: 1983, ‘Justice, Beneficence or Common Sense: The President’s Commission’s Report on Access to Health Care’, The Journal of Philosophy and Medicine 8, 381–388.Google Scholar
- 15.Sass, H.M.: 1988, ‘National Health Care System: Concurring Conflicts’, in R.M. Massey and H.M. Sass (eds.), Health Care Systems: Moral Conflicts in European and American Public Policy, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
- 16.Wood, C.H.: 1986, ‘The Role of Education in Development: With Special Reference to Health?’, The Royal Society of Arts Journal No. 5354, 96–106.Google Scholar