Advertisement

Equal Opportunity and Health Care Rights for the Elderly

  • Norman Daniels
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 38)

Abstract

The literature on rights to health care — and this volume is no exception — is not shy about pointing to the difficulties talk about such rights brings with it, including problems of specifying their scope, limits, and bases. In this essay, I will try to give some plausible, if abstract, content to the notion of a health care right, indeed to the health care rights of the elderly. But my working assumption in this discussion is that the appeal to a right to health care is not an appropriate starting point for an inquiry into what just health care involves. Rights are not moral fruits that spring up from bare earth, fully ripened without cultivation. Rather, we are justified in claiming a right to health care only if it can be harvested from an acceptable general theory of justice for health care. The theory tells us which kinds of right claims are legitimately viewed as rights. Such a theory also helps us specify the scope and limits of justified right claims. I will appeal to the fair equality of opportunity account of just health care [7] to specify the content of these derivative health care rights.

Keywords

Health Care Service Equal Opportunity Health Care Institution Social Obligation Moral Importance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Aaron, H. and Schwartz, W.: 1984, The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care, Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aday, L.A. and Andersen, R.M.: 1983, ‘Equity of Access to Medical Care: A Conceptual and Empirical Overview’, in President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Securing Access to Health Care, Volume Three: Appendices. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniels, N.: 1979, ‘Rights to Health Care: Programmatic Worries’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4(2), 174–191.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniels, N.: 1982, ‘Am I My Parents’ Keeper?’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7, 517–540.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniels, N.: 1985b, ‘Equal Opportunity, Justice, and Health Care for the Elderly: A Prudential Account’, in H.T. Engelhardt, Jr. and S. Spicker (eds.), Geriatrics: Ethical and Economic Conflict for the 21st Century, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniels, N.: 1981, ‘Health Care Needs and Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 10(2), 146–179.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daniels, N.: 1985c, ‘Is Age-Rationing Just’, invited paper delivered to the Pacific Division, March, American Philosophical Association, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniels, N.: 1985a, Just Health Care, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniels, N.: 1983, ‘Justice Between Age Groups: Am I My Parents’ Keeper?’, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/ Health and Society 61(3), 489–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, K. and Rowland, D., 1983: ‘Uninsured and Underserved: Inequities in Health Care in the U.S.’, in President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Securing Access to Health Care Volume Three: Appendices, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knox, R.: 1984, ‘Fund Cuts Linked to Infant Death Rise’, Boston Globe 225(145) (May 20), 1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moskop, J.: 1983, ‘Rawlsian Justice and a Human Right to Health Care’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8(4), 329–338.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1983: Securing Access to Health Care Volume One: Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman Daniels
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTufts UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations