Abstract
The literature on rights to health care — and this volume is no exception — is not shy about pointing to the difficulties talk about such rights brings with it, including problems of specifying their scope, limits, and bases. In this essay, I will try to give some plausible, if abstract, content to the notion of a health care right, indeed to the health care rights of the elderly. But my working assumption in this discussion is that the appeal to a right to health care is not an appropriate starting point for an inquiry into what just health care involves. Rights are not moral fruits that spring up from bare earth, fully ripened without cultivation. Rather, we are justified in claiming a right to health care only if it can be harvested from an acceptable general theory of justice for health care. The theory tells us which kinds of right claims are legitimately viewed as rights. Such a theory also helps us specify the scope and limits of justified right claims. I will appeal to the fair equality of opportunity account of just health care [7] to specify the content of these derivative health care rights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aaron, H. and Schwartz, W.: 1984, The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care, Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C.
Aday, L.A. and Andersen, R.M.: 1983, ‘Equity of Access to Medical Care: A Conceptual and Empirical Overview’, in President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Securing Access to Health Care, Volume Three: Appendices. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Daniels, N.: 1979, ‘Rights to Health Care: Programmatic Worries’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4(2), 174–191.
Daniels, N.: 1982, ‘Am I My Parents’ Keeper?’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7, 517–540.
Daniels, N.: 1985b, ‘Equal Opportunity, Justice, and Health Care for the Elderly: A Prudential Account’, in H.T. Engelhardt, Jr. and S. Spicker (eds.), Geriatrics: Ethical and Economic Conflict for the 21st Century, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.
Daniels, N.: 1981, ‘Health Care Needs and Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 10(2), 146–179.
Daniels, N.: 1985c, ‘Is Age-Rationing Just’, invited paper delivered to the Pacific Division, March, American Philosophical Association, San Francisco, California.
Daniels, N.: 1985a, Just Health Care, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N.: 1983, ‘Justice Between Age Groups: Am I My Parents’ Keeper?’, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/ Health and Society 61(3), 489–522.
Davis, K. and Rowland, D., 1983: ‘Uninsured and Underserved: Inequities in Health Care in the U.S.’, in President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Securing Access to Health Care Volume Three: Appendices, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Knox, R.: 1984, ‘Fund Cuts Linked to Infant Death Rise’, Boston Globe 225(145) (May 20), 1.
Moskop, J.: 1983, ‘Rawlsian Justice and a Human Right to Health Care’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8(4), 329–338.
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1983: Securing Access to Health Care Volume One: Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daniels, N. (1991). Equal Opportunity and Health Care Rights for the Elderly. In: Bole, T.J., Bondeson, W.B. (eds) Rights to Health Care. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28295-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28295-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-1137-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-28295-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive