Advertisement

Scenario Analysis

Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 29)

Abstract

Strategies and scenarios are usually designed by strategic planners who prepare a decision which is irreversible for a long period of time. First, the factors are identified which affect the economic, political, and social developments until a predetermined horizon and which are beyond the decision maker’s control. Because these factors are mostly interconnected, the hypothetical future developments can be bundled into a small number of coherent scenarios. Usually, the planners design a trend-following scenario where the current developments are continued without interruptions (business as usual), an optimistic scenario where the developments proceed in a more upward direction, and a pessimistic scenario with a less upward or even downward direction of the developments. Each strategy has certain desirable and/or undesirable consequences within the context of the respective scenarios. In choosing a strategy, the decision makers have to evaluate and to weigh these consequences and to take into account the scenario probabilities. For the benefits and the pitfalls of scenario analysis, see Leemhuis (1985) and de Geus (1988), the pioneers at Royal Dutch/Shell in the nineteen seventies, and Mintzberg (1994).

Keywords

Nuclear Energy Scenario Analysis Electricity Demand Rank Reversal Energy Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References to Chapter 8

  1. 1.
    Arts, F., Ruiter, W. de, and Klaassen, R., “Belief in Nuclear Energy: Attitudes and Opinions of Dutch Nuclear Experts” (in Dutch). Milieu, Tijdschrift voor Milieukunde 9, 163–173, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fishbein, M, and Ajzen, I., “Belief, Attitude, Intention, Behavior”. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geus, A.P. de, “Planning as Learning”. Harvard Business Review, March-April 1988, pp. 70–74.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leemhuis, J.P., “Using Scenarios to Develop Strategies”. Long Range Planning 18, 30–37, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lootsma, F.A., Boonekamp, P.G.M., Cooke, R.M., and Oostvoorn, F. van, “Choice of a Long-Term Strategy for the National Electricity Supply via Scenario Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis”. European Journal of Operational Research 48, 189–203, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mintzberg, H., “The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning”. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitroff, I.I., “The Subjective Side of Science, a Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists”. Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Nowotny, H., “Kernenergie: Gefahr oder Notwendigkeit. Anatomie eines Konflikts”. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Personalised recommendations