Abstract
Although many decisions are made, not by individuals, but in groups such as boards, councils, and committees, the MCDA literature pays little attention to group decision making. Particularly the power relations in groups are overlooked. There is always a power game, however. In national decision-making bodies each member seems to have a weight which is proportional to the size of the organization which he/she represents. In international decision-making bodies the weights of the members are related to the population size or the Gross National Product of the respective countries. Alternatives which are weakly supported by the powerful members have therefore little chance of being adopted by the group, even when MCDA reveals a high degree of support for them under the erroneous assumption that all members have equal weights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References to Chapter 6
Aczél, J., and Saaty, Th.L., “Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27, 93–102, 1983.
Barzilai, J., and Lootsma, F.A., “Power Relations and Group Aggregation in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART”. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6, 155–165, 1997. In the same issue there are comments by O.I. Larichev (p. 166), P. Korhonen (pp. 167–168), and L.G. Vargas (pp. 169–170), as well as a response by F.A. Lootsma and J. Barzilai (pp. 171 — 174).
Bueno de Mesquita, B., and Stokman, F.N., “European Community Decision Making”. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1994.
Galbraith, J.K., “The Anatomy of Power”. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, 1983.
Heller, F.A., and Wilpert, B., “Competence and Power in Managerial Decision Making”. Wiley, New York, 1981.
Hofstede, G., “Management Scientists are Human”. Management Science 40, 4–13, 1994.
Honert, R. van den, and Lootsma, F.A., “Group Preference Aggregation in the Multiplicative AHP. The Model of the Group Decision Process and Pareto Optimality”. European Journal of Operational Research 96, 363–370, 1996.
Hwang, C.L., and Lin, M.J., “Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria”. Springer, Berlin, 1987.
LaPlante, A., “Nineties Style Brainstorming”. Technology Supplement to Forbes Magazine, October 25, pp. 44–61, 1993.
Lootsma, F.A., “Prospects for MCDA in Groups”. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 7, 121–122, 1998.
Lootsma, F.A., Mensch, T.C.A., and Vos, F.A., “Multi-Criteria Analysis and Budget Reallocation in Long-Term Research Planning”. European Journal of Operational Research 47, 293–305, 1990.
Mintzberg, H., “Power in and around Organizations”. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
Radford, K.J., “Individual and Small Group Decisions”. Springer, New York, 1989.
Ramanathan, R., and Ganesh, L.S., “Group Preference Aggregation Methods employed in the AHP: an Evaluation and an Intrinsic Process for Deriving Members’ Weightages”. European Journal of Operational Research 79, 249–265, 1994.
Roy, B., and Vanderpooten, D., “The European School of MCDA: Emergence, Basic Features, and Current Works”. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5, 22–37, 1996. In the same volume there is a comment by F.A. Lootsma (pp. 37–39) as well as a response by B. Roy and D. Vanderpooten (pp. 165–166).
Spillman, B., Spillman, R., and Bezdek, J., “A Fuzzy Analysis of Consensus in Small Groups”. In P.P. Wang and S.K. Chang (eds.), “Fuzzy Sets, Theory and Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems”. Plenum, New York, 1980, pp. 291–308.
Taylor, A.D., “Mathematics and Politics”. Springer, New York, 1995.
Walker, W., Abrahamse, A., Bolten, J., Kahan, J.P., Riet, O. van de, Kok, M, and Braber, M. den, “A Policy Analysis of Dutch River Dike Improvements: Trading Off Safety, Cost, and Environmental Impacts”. Operations Research 42, 823–836, 1994.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(1999). Group Decision Making. In: Lootsma, F.A. (eds) Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis via Ratio and Difference Judgement. Applied Optimization, vol 29. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28008-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28008-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5669-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-28008-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive