Advertisement

The Alternatives in Perspective

Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 29)

Abstract

The question of what preference actually is and how it is triggered has rarely been discussed in the literature on MCDA although it is of prime importance. How do we see the alternatives? Methods for MCDA are designed to reveal the (pre-existing?) preferences of the decision makers via more or less sophisticated elicitation procedures. Since the true nature of preference is not a point of discussion there are several schools in MCDA. Some of them advocate ordinal methods with the argument that the decision makers cannot accurately measure their preference intensities. Others, however, develop cardinal methods because they are convinced that subjective measurement of preference intensity is feasible and sufficiently reliable indeed. Thus, the unresolved issue of what preference actually is and how it can be modelled strongly affects the development of MCDA methods. For an extensive discussion of the issue we refer the reader to the Chapters 7 and 10 of Von Winterfeldt and Edwards (1986).

Keywords

Decision Maker Colour Perception Golden Section Colour Categorization Musical Composition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References to Chapter 5

  1. 1.
    Berlin, B., and Kay, P., “Basic Color terms: Their Universality and Evolution”. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berthoz, A., “Le Sens du Mouvement”. Editions Odile Jacob, Paris, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beutelbacher, A., and Petri, B., “Der Goldene Schnitt”. 2. Auflage. BI Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruce, V., and Green, P.R., “Visual Perception, Physiology, and Ecology”. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, UK, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bünning, E., “The Physiological Clock, Circadian Rhythms and Biological Chronometry”. The Heidelberg Science Library, Springer, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doczi, G., “The Power of Limits, Proportional Harmonies in Nature, Art, and Architecture”. Shambala, Boulder, Colorado, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibson, J.J., “The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception”. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hagenmaier, O., “Der Goldene Schnitt, ein Harmoniegesetz und seine Anwendungen”. Moos & Partner, Gräfelfing, Germany, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hekkert, P., “Artful Judgements”. Doctoral Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. l0.
    Herz-Fischler, R., “A Mathematical History of Division in Extreme and Mean Ratio”. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huntley, H.E., “The Divine Proportion, a Study in Mathematical Beauty”. Dover, New York, 1970.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kay, P., and McDaniel, C.K., “The Linguistic Significance of the Meaning of Basic Color Terms”. Language 54, 610–646, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H., “Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Prefernces and value-Trade-Offs”. Wiley, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelso, J.A.S., “Human Motor Behavior, an Introduction”. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lipovetsky, S., and Lootsma, F.A., “Generalized Golden Sections, Repeated Bisections, and Aesthetic Pleasure”. To appear in the European Journal of Operational Research, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lootsma, F.A., “Fuzzy Logic for Planning and Decision Making”. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1997.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller, G.A., “The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information”. Psychological Review 63, 81–97, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peper, C.E., “Tapping Dynamics”. Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Free University, Amsterdam, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenbaum, D.A., “Human Motor Control”. Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roy, B., “Méthodology Multicritère d’Aide à la Décision”. Economica, Collection Gestion, Paris, 1985.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Runion, G.R., “The Golden Section and Related Curiosa”. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois, 1972.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taylor, J.R., “Linguistic Categorization, Prototypes in Linguistic Theory”. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wadum, J., “Vermeer in Perspective”. In “Johannes Vermeer”, Maurítshuis, The Hague, and National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. Waanders, Zwolle, The Netherlands, 67–79, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Winfree, A.T., “The Timing of Biological Clocks”. Scientific American Books, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winterfeldt, D. von, and Edwards, W., “Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Personalised recommendations