MCDA in the Hands of Its Masters
The MCDA methods, usually developed by specialists in academic research institutes, were mostly designed for decision making in public administration and industrial management. Developed in the ivory tower of cool scientific contemplation, they might be inadequate for the turbulent world of government and business. The specialists with a vivid interest in applications of MCDA therefore had to cross the notorious chasm between theory and practice. Occasionally, however, they also found themselves in the role of decision makers. In such a role, they were in the position to judge the effectiveness of mathematical and computational support for decision making. How did they see the MCDA methods from inside, how did they use their first-hand knowledge about the algorithmic ideas, how did they handle the underlying assumptions, the strengths and the weaknesses, the pitfalls and the benefits of MCDA? How did they work individually with MCDA, how did they apply it in groups, and how did they come to a decision? A thorough study is not yet available. This chapter only sketches our experiences in various situations.
KeywordsDecision Maker American School Early Ninety Alternative Combination European Working Group
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References to Chapter 11
- 3.French, S., Simpson, L., Atherton, E., Belton, V., Dawes, R., Edwards, W., Hämäläinen, R., Larichev, O., Lootsma, F.A., Pearman, A., and Vlek, C, “Problem Formulation for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Report of a Workshop”. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 7, 242–262, 1998.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kuhn, T.S., “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Second Edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1971.Google Scholar
- 5.Lootsma, F.A., “The French and the American School in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis”. RAIRO/Recherche Opérationnelle 24, 263–285, 1990. A short version appeared in A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein, and S. Zionts (eds), “Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis”. Springer, Berlin, 1992, pp. 253–268.Google Scholar
- 7.Lootsma, F.A., Rog, L., and Kok, M., “Choice of Working Languages in a European Working Group for Multicriteria Decision Aid”. Journal of Information Science and Technology 2, 170–176, 1993.Google Scholar
- 8.Mintzberg, H., “Power in and around Organizations”. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.Google Scholar
- 9.Moore, G.A., “Crossing the Chasm, Marketing and Selling Technology Products to Mainstream Customers”. Harper Business, 1991.Google Scholar
- 10.Roy, B., “Methodologie Multicritère d’Aide à la Décision”. Economica, Collection Gestion, Paris, 1985.Google Scholar
- 12.Schärlig, A., “Décider sur Plusieurs Critères”. Presses Polytechniques Romandes, Lausannes, Switzerland, 1985.Google Scholar
- 14.Winterfeldt, D. von, and Edwards, W., “Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.Google Scholar