Advertisement

Model Reduction and Control of Multistage Flash (MSF) Desalinization Plants

  • Srinivas Ramamurthy
  • Jayanta Pal
  • Ak Sinha
  • Darwish Al Gobaisi
  • Ganti Rao
Part of the International Series in Intelligent Technologies book series (ISIT, volume 3)

Abstract

Multistage flash (MSF) desalinization plants are a major means of desalting scawater for human use in several arid regions of the world in the present times. The MSF plants are physically large and their control usually involves more than twenty control loops. According to the present practice, the controllers are of the PI or PID type and their tuning is largely based on experience rather than on systematic modeling of the plant. Plant modeling based on physical principles gives rise to a large and complex set of coupled nonlinear differential equations which has to be linearized about a chosen set of operating conditions. As the operating point changes, the resulting linearized model also changes. This requires retuning of the controllers in certain loops depending on the changing linear plant model in the related loops. The linearized model happens to be enormously large in size requiring reduction for controller design and practical implementation. There exist several model reduction methods and they have to be chosen to meet the objectives of adequate modeling. In a nonlinear plant, the linearized model parameters vary with the operating conditions. To make a controller to simultaneously meet the demands of model reduction and variable operating conditions, the conventional approaches of control are either inadequate or too involved. In this chapter, a technique based on artificial neural networks (ANN) for model reduction under plant parameter perturbations is proposed. The complexity of analysis, reduction, computation and controller design in the variable conditions of operation is avoided by simply training an ANN to give the parameters of a reduced model for use in controller design. An automated decision support may be provided to choose the best ANN configuration for reduced order modeling of a large, complex and variable plant which provides the basis for a robust design of a simple controller. Certain well established model reduction methods are employed in the mainstream of the procedure and the related results are impressive. Based on these results, a scheme based on an added ANN, for direct controller implementation under the discussed conditions is proposed. The results of this modest attempt point out to the strong possibility of more intelligent control of large complex plants under uncertainty and/or variable plant dynamics. The present discussion is centred on SISO loop designs, which does not rule out the possibility of simple extensions to MIMO designs.

Keywords

Artificial Neural Network Model Reduction System Number Step Response Reduce Order Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Al-Gobaisi D.M.K., A.S. Barakzai, and A.M. El-Nashar, “An overview of modern control strategies for optimizing thermal desalinization plants”. in Desalinization and water Re-use, Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium, (Miriam Balaban, ed.), (Malta), 15–18 April 1991.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Davison E.J., “A method for simplifying linear dynamic systems”, Transactions of IEEE on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-11, pp. 93, 101, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Wilson D.A., “Optimum solution of model reduction problem”, Proceedings of IEE, Vol. 117, pp. 1161, 1165, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Sinha N.K. and G.T. Bereznai, “Optimum approximation of high order systems by low order models”, International Journal of Control, Vol. 14, pp. 951, 959, 1971.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Luus R. and G.D. Howitt, “Model reduction by optimization”, Hungarian Journal of Industrial Chemistry, Vol. 16, pp. 29, 38, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kokotovic P.V., R.E. O’ Malley, Jr, and P. Sannuti, “Singular perturbations and order reduction in control theory-an overview”, Automatica, Vol. 12, pp. 123, 132, 1976.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Moore B.C., “Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability and model reduction”, Transactions of IEEE on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-26, pp. 17, 32, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Shamash Y., “Stable reduced order models using pad é-type approximations”, Transactions of IEEE on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-19, pp. 615, 617, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Pal J., “Improved padé approximants using stability equation method”, Electronics Letters, Vol. 19, pp. 426, 427, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Glover K., “All optimal hankel-norm approximations of linear multivariable systems and their I-error bounds”, International Journal of Control, Vol. 39, no.6, pp. 1115, 1193, 1984.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chen C.F. and L.S. Shieh, “A novel approach to linear model simplification”, International Journal of Control, Vol. 8, pp. 561, 570, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Pal J., “System reduction by a mixed method”, Transactions of IEEE on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-25,no. 5, pp. 973, 976, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bosley M.J. and F.P. Lees, “A survey of simple transfer function derivations from high order state-variable models”, Automatica, Vol. 8, pp. 765, 775, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Pal J., “An algorithmic method for the simplification of linear dynamic scalar systems”, International Journal of Control, Vol. 43, pp. 257, 269, 1986.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Hutton M.F. and Friedland B., “Routh approximation for reducing order of linear, time-invariant systems”, IEEE Transactions of Automatic Control, Vol. AC-20. pp. 329, 337, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Pal J., “Stable reduced order padé approximants using the routh-hurwitz array”,Electronics Letters, Vol. 15, pp. 225–226, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Sinha A.K. and J. Pal, “Simulation based reduced order modeling using aclustering technique”, Computers and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp.159, 169, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D.T. Pham and X. Liu, “State-space identification of dynamic systems using neural networks”, Engineering Applications of AI, Vol. 3, pp. 198, 203, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Chu, S.R., R. Shoureshi, and M. Tenorio, “Neural networks for system identification”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 31, 35, 1990.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Narendra K.S. and K. Parthasarathy, “Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks”, IEEE Tranasactions of Neural Networks, Vol. 1,no. 1, pp. 4, 27, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Liang Jin, Peter N. Nikiforuk, and Madan M Gupta, “Model matching control of unknown nonlinear systems using recurrent neural networks”, in IFAC 11th Triennial World Congress, (Sydney, Australia), pp. 337, 344, 1993.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Anderson B.D.O. and J.B. Moore, Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods. Prentice-Hall of India Ltd., 1991.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Safanov M., “Future directions in the robust control theory”, in IFAC 11th Triennial World Congress, (Tallin, Estoria), pp. 171, 175, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srinivas Ramamurthy
    • 1
  • Jayanta Pal
    • 1
  • Ak Sinha
    • 1
  • Darwish Al Gobaisi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ganti Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringIndia Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Water and Electricity DepartmentGovernment of Abu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations