To Break the Pentameter—Ethics Courses Implications for Business Education

  • Clarence Walton
Part of the Issues in Business Ethics book series (IBET, volume 11)


It may seem strange—possibly bizarre to some—to introduce an analysis of a business curricular problem with a quotation from one whose political philosophy was reprehensible, whose personal lifestyle was off-beat, and whose stylistic writings often deny full comprehension. Thus forewarned, consider, then, the level of Ezra Pound:

(To break the pentameter, that was the first heave)


Business Ethic Corporate Social Performance Professional Ethic Professional School Business System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Harold Berkman, “Corporate Ethics: Who Cares?” Report of the School of Business Administration (University of Miami, Spring 1979), p. 3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Derek C. Bok, “Can Ethics Be Taught?” Change (October 1978), p. 7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rogene A. Buchholz, Business Environment and Public Policy: A Study of Teaching and Research in Schools of Business and Management (St. Louis: Washington University, February, 1979), pp. 88–90. Cited as the Buchholz Report. See also the earlier study by Thomas F. McMahon, Report on the Teaching of Socio-Ethical Issues in Collegiate Schools of Business/Public Administration (Charlottesville: University of Virginia, Center for the Study of Applied Ethics, 1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A report of the AACSB Educational Innovation Committee (December 5, 1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edwin M. Epstein and Dow Votaw, Rationality, Legitimacy and Responsibility: Search for New Directions in Business and Society (Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company, 1978), P. xiii.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    William Frederick, From CSR1 to CSR2: “The Maturity of Business-and-Society Thought.” Working Paper (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Business, no date). See also Joseph McGuire, The Changing Nature of Business Responsibilities (Oklahoma State University: School of Business, 1978) and the author’s pioneering effort, Corporate Social Responsibilities (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company 1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harold L. Johnson, Disclosure of Corporate Social Performance (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1979), p. 9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patrick Connor and Boris Becker, “Values in Organization: Suggestions for Research,” Academy of Management Journal XVIII (1975), p. 58.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchholz Report, p. 126.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charles Schultze made this point explicitly in his Godkin Lecture at Harvard, “Public Use of Private Interest.” (November and December 1976.)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karl Polanyi, The Transformation (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1944), especially Chapters 3–5 and 12–15, and Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Economy and Society (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1956).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robert Unger, Knowledge and Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1975), pp. 161, 163Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1942).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    David Reisman, “The Anti-Organization Syndrome,” Encounter (September 1978), pp. 52–68.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    See William Chace, “Lionel Trilling: The Contrariness of Culture,” The American Scholar (Winter 1978–9), pp. 49–54.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peter Berger, “Ethics and the New Class,” Washington: Georgetown University Center on Ethics and Public Policy (September 1978), p. 8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paul Weaver, “Regulations of the New Class,” Public Interest (Winter 1978), p. 54. See also Peter Steinfels, “The Reasonable Right,” Esquire (February 13, 1979) for a vignette of the “old” class.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murray Weidenbaum, Government-Mandated Price Increases (Washington, D.C., The American Enterprise Institute, 1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    George Cabot Lodge, “Managerial Implications of Ideological Change,” Chapter 2 in Clarence Walton, ed., The Ethics of Corporate Conduct (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Louis Kohlmeier, “Budge Balance? National Planning?” Financier (January 1979), pp. 6–10. Relevant, too, is James “Toole, “What’s Ahead for the Business Government Relationship,” Harvard Business Review (March–April 1979), pp. 94–105.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arthur Miller and Lewis Solomon, “Chains on the Corporate Beast,” Business and Society Review (Fall, 1978), p. 8.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    David Granick, “International Differences in Executive Reward Systems,” Columbia Journal of World Business (Summer 1978), pp. 45–50, and his impressive Manager Comparisons in Four Developed Countries (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1972). See also Edward Epstein, “The Social Role of Business Enterprise in Britain: An American’s Perspective,” Journal of Management Studies (October 1976), pp. 210–233.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    David Finn, The Corporate Oligarch (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1969).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alfred North Whitehead, The Aims of Education (New York: Macmillan Co., 1978), p. 39.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robert Kirk Mueller, Career Conflict (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Health Co., 1978), p. 39.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eli Ginzberg and Ivar Berg, Democratic Values and the Rights of Management (New York: Columbia University, Press, 1963).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clarence C. Walton, Ethos and the Executive: Values in Managerial Decision-Making (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    David Ewing, Freedom Inside the Organization: Bringing Civil Liberties to the Workingplace (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979). See, for example, the special report on “Dissent in the Corporate World,” The Civil Liberties Review (September–October 1978). Professor Sissela Bok of the Harvard Medical Faculty is also working on this problem.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Charles Powers and David Vogel, “Teaching Business Ethics.’” Unpublished paper presented the Hasting Center Conference at Harvard University on April 14, 199.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Charles Fried, Right and Wrong (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 7.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peter Drucker, Management: Task, Responsibilities and Priorities (New York: Harper and Row, 1973), pp. 37–45.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Powers, loc. cit., p. 40.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sebastian de Grazia, The Political Community: A Study of Anomie (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943), p. 49.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buchholz Report, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Daniel Callahan, “Qualifications for the Teaching of Ethics.” Paper presented to the Hastings Workshops, April 19–20, 1979. p. 1.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ibid., p. 4Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lester Thurow, “Economics, 1977,” Daedalus (Fall, 1977), especially pp. 83–87.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Paul Ramsey, Ethics at the Edges of Life (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978), p. xiii–xiv.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jacques Maritain, Science and Wisdom (New York: Schribners, 1960).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Edmund Pellegrino, “Ethics and the Moral Center of the Medieval Enterprise,” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medievalism Vol. 54 (July–August 1978), p. 62.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fried, op. cit., p. 10.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    David Daube, “Greek and Roman Definitions of Impossible Laws,” The Natural Law Forum Vol. 12 (1967), p. 1.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    John Kleinig, “Good Samaritanism,” Philosophy in Public Affairs Vol. 5 (1976), pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    “The New Rationalism and Its Implications for Understanding Corporations,” in Epstein and Votaw, Rationality, Legitimacy and Responsibility, pp. 65–66.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    The Critique of Pure Reason (New York: Doubleday and Co., 1961), 2nd ed., pp. 177–178. Translated by N.K. Smith.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
    Derek Bok, loc. cit., p. 27.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jacques Barzun, “Humanities, Pieties, Practicalities in Universities,” (New York: Columbia University Seminar Report, November 14, 1973), p. 31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clarence Walton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations