Advertisement

Diverging traditions: Professional and religious medical ethics of the nineteenth century

  • Robert M. Veatch
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 49)

Abstract

The existing literature provides only a poor understanding of the history of nineteenth-century American medical ethics. That literature gives us considerable insight into the background of the passage of the American Medical Association’s Code of Ethics of 1847, including the widely adopted state and local association codes beginning with the Boston Medical Association code of 1808 ([3], [4], [22], [24], [25]). What we do not know much about is how these codifications played among physicians and non-physician intellectuals concerned about the morality of the practice of medicine in a period of considerable controversy and confusion. Of particular interest is the reception, if any, of the 1847 AM A Code and its predecessors among those doing what we would now call medical ethics in the religious traditions of the time. While modern associations of physicians have taken considerable interest in the writing of codes of ethics to govern the relations of physicians and patients, it would be a serious mistake to assume that medical ethics is synonymous with these professionally generated codes. Not only do physicians as well as other health professionals have views on the ethics of the lay-professional relation that may differ from the codes of their organized associations, many other groups (see [15]) - religious, governmental, and philosophical - have had well-developed positions on the ethics of medicine and the roles of the patient and professional healer.

Keywords

Nineteenth Century Medical Ethic Ethical Tradition Hippocratic Oath Catholic Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    American Medical Association: 1848, Code of Medical Ethics: Adopted by the American Medical Association at Philadelphia, May, 1847, and by the New York Academy of Medicine in October, 1847, H. Ludwig and Company, New York; this volume, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnes, G.: 1933, The Anti-Slavery Impulse: 1830–1844, (1933 reissue) Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burns, C: 1977, “Reciprocity in the Development of Anglo-American Medical Ethics, 1765–1865,” in Burns, C. (ed.). Legacies in Ethics and Medicine, pp. 300–6, Science History Publications, New York; this volume, pp. 135–144.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burns, C: 1978, “Medical Ethics, History of: North America: Seventeenth to Nineteenth Century,” in Reich, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Vol. III, pp. 963–5, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bushnell, H.: 1861, Christian Nurture, (1962 reissue) Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Capellmann, C: 1879, Pastoral Medicine, (W. Dassel, trans.), Pustet, New York.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carrick, P.: 1985, Medical Ethics in Antiquity: Philosophical Perspectives on Abortion and Euthanasia, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edelstein, L.: 1967, “The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation,” in Temkin, O. and Temkin, C. (eds.), Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein, pp. 3–63, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Filler, L.: 1960, The Crusade Against Slavery: 1830–1860, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finney, C: 1835, Revivals of Religion (1962 reissue). The Moody Bible Institute, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuller, R.: 1989, Alternative Medicine and American Religious Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gury, J.: 1866, Casus conscientiae in praecipuas guestiones theologiae moralis, 6th ed. (1881), Briday, Lyons.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gury, J.: 1869, Compendium theologiae moralis, 18th ed., H. Pelaguad, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hobbs, G.: 1964, The Crusade Against Slavery: 1830, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hooker, W.: 1849, Physician and Patient; or, a Practical View of the Mutual Duties, Relations and Interests of the Medical Profession and the Community, Baker and Scribner, New York.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jakobovits, I.: 1978, “Judaism,” in Reich, W. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Vol. 2, pp. 791–802, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones, R. K.: 1985, Sickness and Sectarianism, Gower, Hampshire, England.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones, W.: 1924, The Doctor’s Oath: An Essay In The History Of Medicine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jonsen, A. and Hellegers, A.: 1974, “Conceptual Foundations for an Ethics of Medical Care,” in Tancredi, L. (ed.), Ethics of Health Care, pp. 3–20, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jonsen, A. and Toulmin, S.: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kelly, D.: 1979, The Emergence of Roman Catholic Medical Ethics in North America: An Historical — Methodological-Bibliographical Study, Edwin Mellen Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kendrick, F.: 1860–61, Theologia moralis, H. Dessain, Mechlin.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    King, L.: 1982, “The ‘Old Code’ of Medical Ethics and Some Problems It had to Face,” Journal of the American Medical Association 248, 2329–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Konings, A.: 1880, Theologia moralis novissimi ecclesiae docloris S. Alphonsi, in compendium redacta, et usui venerabilis cleri americana accomodata, 4th ed., Benziger Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Konold, D.: 1962, A History of American Medical Ethics 1847–1912, State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lehmkuhl, A.: 1907, Casus conscientiae ad usum confessariorum compositi et soluti, 3rd ed., Herder, Fribourg.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liguori, A. M. De’: 1748–85, Theologia moralis (1905–1912, Editio nova), L. Gaude (ed.), 4 Vols., Vaticana, Roma.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCullough, L.: 1985, “Virtue, Etiquette, and Anglo-American Medical Ethics in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” in Shelp, E. (ed.) Virtue and Medicine: Exploration in the Character of Medicine, pp. 81–92, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pius IX: 1923, “const. Apostolicae Sedis, 12 Oct. 1869,” Codicis luris Canonici Fontes, P. Gasparri (ed.), Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, Rome, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramsey, P.: 1974, “Commentary: Jonsen and Hellegers,” in Tancredi, L. (ed.), Ethics of Health Care, pp. 3–20, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sabetti, A.: 1889, Compendium theologiae moralis a Joanne Gury, S. J. primo exaratum et deinde ab Antio Ballerini ... auctum nunc vero ad breviorem formam redactum atque ad usum seminariorum hujas reegionis accomodatum, 4th ed., F. Pustet, New York.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scavini, P.: 1850, Theologia moralis universa ad menetem S. Alphonsi M. de Ligorio, 8th ed., Ernesto Oliva, Milan.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scotti, A.: 1836, Catechismo medico ossio suiluppo delle dottrine cotta che conciliano la religione cotta medicina de piu nuovi capi cresciuto nella presente edizione dal ch. suo autore, Facolta.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vanderpool, H., “John Wesley’s Medicine for the Masses,” (unpublished paper).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Veatch, R. and Mason, C.: 1987, “Hippocratic vs. Judeo-Christian Medical Ethics: Principles in Conflict,” The Journal of Religious Ethics 15, 86–105.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Verhey, A.: 1984, “The Doctor’s Oath-and a Christian Swearing It,” in Smith, D. (ed), Respect and Care in Medical Ethic, pp. 157, 170, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    V[illada], P.: 1836, Casus conscientiae his praesertim temporibus accomodati, propositi, ac resoultl, Alfred, Vromant, Brussels.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Walker, W.: 1918, A History of the Christian Church (1959 reissue), Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wesley, J.: 1785, Primitive Physics, 21st ed., J Paramore, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Veatch
    • 1
  1. 1.the Joseph and Rose kennedy Institute of EthicsGeorgetown UniversityWashington, D.C.

Personalised recommendations