Advertisement

Introduction

  • Robert Baker
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 49)

Abstract

In 1789, at the very birth of the United States, one of its founding fathers, Professor Benjamin Rush, signer of the Declaration of Independence and a founder of the medical college of the University of Pennsylvania, concluded his annual course with a lecture on the type of physician the new nation needed. He urged his students to be financially independent fanners who dealt honestly with their patients.

Keywords

American Medical Association Medical Ethic Ethical Theory Scientific Medical Education General Medical Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    American Medical Association: 1847, “Code of Ethics,” Minutes of the Proceedings of the National Medical Convention held in the City of Philad. in May 1847, pp. 83–106; this volume, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Professor and ChairMedical Association: 1867, Code of Ethics of the American Medical Association, Adopted May 1847, J. Windterburn, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arrow, K..: 1963, “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care,” American Economic Review 53, 941–69.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, R.: 1993, “Deciphering Percival’s Code” in [6], pp. 179–212.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, R.: 1995, “The Historical Context of the American Medical Association’s 1847 Code of Ethics, this volume, pp. 47–64.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker, R., Porter, D., and Porter, R.: 1993, The Codification of Medical Morality: Historical and Philosophical Studies of the Formalization of Western Medical Morality in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: Volume One: Medical Ethics and Etiquette in the Eighteenth Century, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baldwin, J.: 1853, “Flush Times of Alabama and Mississippi” in [25], pp. vii–viii.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beauchamp, T.: 1995, “Worthington Hooker on Ethics in Clinical Medicine,” this volume, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beauchamp T. and Childress, J.: 1989, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bell, J. 1847, “Introduction to the Code of Medical Ethics” Minutes of the Proceedings of the National Medical Convention held in the City of Philadelphia, in May 1847, pp. 83–92; this volume, pp. 62–72.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berlant, J.: 1975, Profession and Monopoly: A Study of Medicine in the United Slates and Great Britain, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burns, C: 1977, “Reciprocity in the Development of Anglo-American Medical Ethics, 1765–1865,” in Burns, C. (ed.), Legacies in Ethics and Medicine, pp. 300–6, Science History Publications, New York; this volume, pp. 133–144.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carr-Saunders, A. and Wilson, P.: 1933, The Professions, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carrol, A. and Peters, J.: 1869, “Code or Ethics,” Medical Gazette III, 150.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chapman, C: 1984, Physicians, Law and Ethics, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chapman, N.: 1848, “Presidential Address,” Transactions of the American Medical Association I, 8–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crowther, M. A.: “Forensic Medicine and Medical Ethics in Nineteenth Century Britain,” this volume, pp. 173–190.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis, N.: 1903, History of Medicine, with the Code of Medical Ethics, Cleveland Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gauthier, D.: 1986, Morals by Agreement, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haller, J.: 1981, American Medicine in Transition 1840–1910, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hays, I.: 1847, “Note” to American Medical Association Code of Ethics, this volume, pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holmes, O.: 1891, Medical Essays, 1842–1882, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hooker, W.: 1849, 1972, Physician and Patient, Arno Press (reprint), New York.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kett, J.: 1968, The Formation of the American Medical Profession: The Role of Institutions, 1760–1860, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leake, C: 1927, Percival’s Medical Ethics, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy. State and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parsons, T.: 1951, The Social System, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parsons, T.: 1958, “Definitions of Health and Illness in the Light of American Values and Social Structure,” in Jaco, E. (ed.). Patients, Physicians and Illness, pp. 165–87, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Percival, T.: 1794, Medical Jurisprudence or a Code of Ethics and Institutes Adopted to the Professions of Physic and Surgery, privately circulated, Manchester.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Percival, T.: 1803, Medical Ethics: Or, A Code of Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons, J. Johnson, London.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pickstone, J.: 1993, “Thomas Percival and the Production of Medical Ethics,” in [6], pp. 161–78.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reiser, S.: 1995, “Creating a Medical Profession in the United States: The First Code of Ethics of the American Medical Association,” this volume, pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rothstein, W.: 1972, American Physicians in the Nineteenth Century: From Sects to Science, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rush, B.: 1789, “Observations on the Duties of a Physician, and the Methods of Improving Medicine. Accommodated to the Present State of Society and Manners in the United States,” in Rush, B.: 1815, Medical Inquiries and Observations, Vol. I, pp. 251–64, M. Carey, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ryan, M.: 1831, A Manual of Jurisprudence, compiled from the best medical and legal works: comprising an account of: The Ethics of the Medical Profession, II. The Charter and Statutes Relating to the Faculty; and III. All Medico-legal Questions, with the latest discussions. Being an Analyst’: of a Course of Lectures on Forensic Medicine Annually Delivered in London and intended as a compendium for the use of barristers, solicitors, magistrates, coroners, and medical practitioners, Renshaw and Rush, London.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Starr, P.: 1982, The Social Transformation of American Medicine, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taylor, A.: 1844, A Manual of Medical Jurisprudence, John Churchill, London.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Veatch, R.: 1995, “Diverging Traditions: Professional and Religious Medical Ethics of the Nineteenth Century,” this volume, pp. 121–134.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Waddington, I.: 1975, “The Development of Medical Ethics–A Sociological Analysis”, Medical History 19, 36–51.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Waddington I.: 1984, The Medical Profession in the Industrial Revolution, Gill & Macmillan, Dublin.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ware, J., Bigelow, J., and Holmes, O.: 1849, “Letter to American Medical Association,” Transactions of the American Medical Association II, 353–7.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Warren, J., Hayward, L., and Fleet, J.: 1808, The Boston Medical Police, Association of Boston Physicians, Boston; this volume, pp. 41–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Union CollegeSchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations