When is the Risk Minimal Enough for Children to be Research Subjects?
When should research involving children as subjects be permitted? This difficult and pressing problem is often presented in the form of a dilemma: If we do research involving children as subjects, then we do so using individuals who cannot give informed consent. If we do not, then children as a group are denied many of the benefits of research including therapeutic advances, the possibility of good information about therapies, and the repudiation of dangerous and discredited therapies. Robert Levine shows how the U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (The National Commission) tried to find a morally defensible solution to the question of when children may be enrolled as subjects in research. They held that with appropriate review, safeguards, consent from guardians, and assent from the child, children may be enrolled if the study on balance holds out direct and appropriate benefit to them or if the study is not too risky. Levine served as a consultant to the National Commission and shows sympathy (which I share) for the solution proposed.
KeywordsDirect Benefit National Commission Health Care Decision Uniform Standard Federal Guideline
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Brock, D. W.: 1989, ‘Children’s Competence For Health Care Decision Making’, in this volume, pp. 181–212.Google Scholar
- 3.Holder, A. R.: 1989, ‘Children and Adolescents: Their Right to Decide About Their Own Health Care’, in this volume, pp. 161–172.Google Scholar
- 4.Holmes, R. L.: 1989, ‘Children and Health Care Decision Making: A Reply to Angela Holder’, in this volume, pp. 173–179.Google Scholar
- 5.Holmes, R. L.: 1989, ‘Consent and Decisional Authority in Children’s Health Care Decision Making: A Reply to Dan Brock’, in this volume, pp. 213–219.Google Scholar
- 6.Janofsky, B. A., Starfield, B.: 1981, ‘Assessment of Risk in Research on Children’, Journal of Pediatrics 98, 842–841.Google Scholar
- 7.Kopelman, L.: 1978, ‘Ethical Controversies in Medical Research: The Case of XYY Screening’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 21, 196–204.Google Scholar
- 8.Kopelman, L.: 1981, ‘Estimating Risk in Human Research’, Clinical Research 29, 1–8.Google Scholar
- 11.Levine, R. J.: 1989, ‘Children As Research Subjects’, in this volume, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
- 12.Levine, R. J.: 1986, Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research, Second Edition, Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore.Google Scholar
- 13.McCartney, J. J.: 1978, ‘Research on Children: National Commission Says Yes, If…’ Hastings Center Report, 8, 26–31.Google Scholar
- 15.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: 1981, ‘Final Regulations Amending Basic HHS Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjects’, Federal Register 46 (January 26), 8366–8392.Google Scholar
- 16.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: March 8, 1983, ‘Additional Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research’, Federal Register 48(46), 9814–9820.Google Scholar
- 17.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: 1982, ‘Protection of Human Subjects; Compensation for Research Injuries; Requests for Comments on Report of the President’s Commission’, Federal Register 47 (November 23), 52880–52930.Google Scholar