Advertisement

Derivation and Use of Deadline Information in Real-Time Control Systems

  • Kang G. Shin
  • Hagbae Kim
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 283)

Abstract

This section presents a method for deriving the hard deadline of a real-time control system, which captures the interplay between a controlled process and its controller computer by formally specifying the need of the controlled process in a form understandable to the controller computer. Several examples of deriving and applying the hard-deadline information are also presented to demonstrate the importance of the deadline information.

Keywords

Control Input Feedback Delay Input Disturbance Dynamic Failure Task Execution Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C. M. Belcastro, “Laboratory test methodology for evaluating the effects of electromagnetic disturbances on fault-tolerant control systems,” NASA TM-101665, November 1989.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. P. Belleisle, “Stability of systems with nonlinear feedback through randomly time-varying delays,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-20, no. 1, pp. 67–75, February 1975.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Gosiewski and A. W. Olbrot, “The effect of feedback delays on the performance of multivariable linear control systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-25, no. 4. pp. 729–734, August 1980.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Hirai and Y. Satoh, “Stability of a system with variable time delay,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-25, no. 3, pp. 552–554, June 1980.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Hostetter and J. S. Meditch, “Observing systems with unmeasurable inputs,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-18, pp. 306–307, June 1973.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Kheradpir and J. S. Thorp, “Real-time control of robot manipulators in the presence of obstacles,” IEEE journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 687–698, December 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. Kim and K. G. Shin, “On the maximum feedback delay in a linear/nonlinear control system with input disturbances caused by controller-computer failures,” IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology (in press).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Kim and K. G. Shin, “Design and analysis of an optimal instruction-retry policy for TMR controller computer,” submitted for publication, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. Kim and K. G. Shin, “Evaluation of fault-tolerance latency from realtime application’s perspectives,” submitted for publication, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    I. Koren and Z. Koren, “Analysis of a class of recovery procedures,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-35, no. 8, pp. 703–712, August 1986.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Y. H. Lee and K. G. Shin, “Optimal design and use of retry in faulttolerant computing systems,” Journal of the ACM, vol. 35, pp. 45–69, January 1988.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Leitmann, An Introduction to Optimal Control, New York, NY: McGray-Hill, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. G. Luenberger, Optimization by vector space methods, New York, Wiley, 1969.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Mariton, “Detection delays, false alarm rates and the reconfiguration of control systems,” Int. J. Control, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 981–992, 1989.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Z. V. Rekasius, “Stability of digital control with computer interruption,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-31, no. 4, pp. 356–359, April 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. G. Shin and X. Cui, “Effects of computing time delay on real-time control systems,” in Proc. of 1988 American Control Conf., pp. 1071–1076, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    K. G. Shin and H. Kim, “Derivation and application of hard deadlines for real-time control systems,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1403–1413, Nov./Dec. 1992.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    K. G. Shin, C. M. Krishna, and Y.-H. Lee, “A unified method for evaliating real-time computer controller and its application,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-30, no. 4, pp. 357–366, April 1985.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    K. G. Shin and Y.-H. Lee, “Error detection process — model, design, and its impact on computer performance,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-33, no. 6, pp. 529–539, June 1984.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    K. G. Shin, T.-H. Lin, and Y.-H. Lee, “Optimal checkpointing of real-time tasks,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-36, no. 11, pp. 1328–1341, November 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    D. P. Siewiorek and R. S. Swarz, The Theory and Practice of Reliable System Design, Digital Equipment Corporation, Bedford, MA, 1982.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    D. D. Siljak, “Reliable control using multiple control systems,” Int. J. Control, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 303–329, 1980.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A. Tantawi and M. Ruschitzka, “Performance analysis of checkpinting strategies,” ACM Trans. Computer Systems, vol. 2, pp. 123–1441, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    K. Zahr and C. Slivinsky, “Delay in multivariable computer controlled linear systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-19, no. 8, pp. 442–443, August 1974.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kang G. Shin
    • 1
  • Hagbae Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceThe University of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations