Skip to main content

On the Automated Discovery of Scientific Theories

  • Chapter
Foundations of Knowledge Acquisition

Abstract

This paper summarizes recent research results on applications of computational learning theory to problems involving rich systems of knowledge representation, in particular, first-order logic and extensions thereof.

Research support was provided by the Office of Naval Research under contracts Nos. N00014-87-K-0401 and N00014-89-J-1725.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blumer, A., A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler, & M. Warmuth (1987). Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension (Technical Report UCSC-CRL-87-20). Santa Cruz: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Case, J. & Fulk, M. (Eds.) (1990). Proceedings of the third annual workshop on computational learning theory, San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, C. C. & Keisler, H. J. (1973). Model theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ebbinghaus, H.-D. (1985). Extended logics: the general framework. In Barwise, J. & S. Feferman (eds.), Model theoretic logics. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaifman, H., Osherson, D. & Weinstein, S. (1990). A reason for theoretical terms. Erkenntnis, 32, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glymour, C. (1985). Inductive inference in the limit. Erkenntnis, 22, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gold, E. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hempel, C. G. (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Langley, P., Bradshaw, G., & Simon, H. (1983). Rediscovering chemistry with the BACON system. In R. Michalski, J. Carbonell, & T. Mitchell (Eds.) Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Palo Alto, CA: Tioga.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langley, P. & Nordhausen, B. (1986). A framework for empirical discovery. In Proceedings of the International Meeting on Advances in Learning, Les Arcs, France.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osherson, D., Stob, M., & Weinstein, S. (1986). Systems that Learn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Osherson, D., Stob, M., & Weinstein, S. (1989). On approximate truth. In R. Rivest, D. Haussler, & M. Warmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the second annual workshop on computational learning theory. San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osherson, D., Stob, M., & Weinstein, S. (1989). A theory of approximate truth. (Technical Report). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osherson, D. & Weinstein, S. (1986). Identification in the limit of first-order structures. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Osherson, D., Stob, M., & Weinstein, S. (1988). Mechanical learners pay a price for Bayesianism. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 53, 1245–1251.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Osherson, D. & Weinstein, S. (1989). Paradigms of truth detection. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 18, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Osherson, D., Stob, M., & Weinstein, S. (1991). A universal inductive inference machine,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56, 661–672.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Osherson, D., Stob, M., & Weinstein, S., (in press). A universal method of scientific inquiry. Machine Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Osherson, D., Stob, M., & Weinstein, S. (1991). New directions in automated scientific discovery. Information Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Osherson, D. & Weinstein, S. (1989). Identifiable collections of countable structures. Philosophy of Science, 56, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Osherson, D. & Weinstein, S. (1990). On advancing simple hypotheses. Philosophy of Science, 57, 266–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Osherson, D. & Weinstein, S. (in press). Relevant consequence and scientific discovery. Journal of Philosophical Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rivest, R., Haussler, D., & Warmuth, M. (Eds.) (1989). Proceedings of the second annual workshop on computational learning theory. San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schurz, G. (1991). Relevant deduction. Erkenntnis.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schurz, G. & Weingartner, P. (1987). Verisimilitude defined by relevant consequence-elements: A new reconstruction of Popper’s idea. In T. A. Kuipers (Ed.), What is closer-to-the-truth? Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro, E. (1981). An algorithm that infers theories from facts. In Proceedings of the seventh international joint conference on artificial intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Valiant, L. (1984). A theory of the learnable. Communications of the ACM, 27, 1134–1142.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Weingartner, P. (1988). Remarks on the consequence-class of theories. In E. Scheibe (Ed.), The role of experience in science. Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weingartner, P. & Schurz, G. (1986). Paradoxes solved by simple relevance criteria. Logique et Analyse.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Zytkow (1987). Combining many searches in the FAHRENHEIT discovery system. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Machine Learning, Irvine CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osherson, D., Weinstein, S. (1993). On the Automated Discovery of Scientific Theories. In: Meyrowitz, A.L., Chipman, S. (eds) Foundations of Knowledge Acquisition. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 195. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-27366-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-27366-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-9278-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-27366-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics