Advertisement

Networks and Internationalization: Managing Complexity Through Knowledge

  • Enzo Rullani

Abstract

Recent developments in the theory of internationalization have paid increasing attention to networks as organizational forms that can combine unity with differentiation inside a global value chain. This combination is nowadays a crucial factor for successful strategies, especially in international markets. In conditions of great complexity, a good entrepreneurial strategy is required to unify the targets and resources of a great numbers of independent firms or controlled subsidiaries all over the international value chain. But it is also crucial a differentiated implementation of the strategy in each national market and in each local area.

Keywords

Direct Foreign Investment Transaction Cost Direct Investment Organizational Form Multinational Corporation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acocella, N., Schiattarella, R., 1988, Teorie delta internazionallizzazione e realtà italiana, Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
  2. Aharoni, Y., 1966, The Foreign Investment Decision Process, Boston, MA.: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  3. Albertini, S., 1991, Gli accordi strategici. Strumenti per la costruzione di un’impresa network, Milano: Egea.Google Scholar
  4. Amendola, A., et al., 1981, Ciclo del prodotto e divisione internazionale del lav oro, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  5. Antonelli, C., 1986, “The International Diffusion of Process Innovation and the Neotechnology Theory of International Trade,” proceedings of the Conference on Innovation Diffusion, Venice, March 21–22.Google Scholar
  6. Antonelli, C. (ed.), 1988, New Information Technology and Industrial Change: The Italian Case, Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Baccarani, C., 1985, Profilo e maturityà di un settore: struttura e strategia, Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  8. Balcet, G., 1981, Industrializzazione, multinazionali e dipendenza tecnologica, Torino: Loescher.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, G.W., 1967, “The Promise of the Multinational Corporation,” Fortune, 6.Google Scholar
  10. Bellandi, G., 1983, L’impresa minore tra artigianato e piccola industria, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  11. Bilkey, W.J., 1978, “An Attempted Integration of the Literature on Export Behavior of Firms,” Journal of International Business Studies, 9, pp. 34–46.Google Scholar
  12. Benassi, M., 1990, “L’innovazione organizzativa nel settore della grande informatica. II networking interno-esterno,” Quaderni di Economia e Politica Industriale, 3.Google Scholar
  13. Boari, C., Grandi, A., Lorenzoni, G., 1992, “Le organizzazioni a rete: tre concetti di base,” in Lorenzoni, G. (a cura di), Accordi, reti e vantaggio competitivo, Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
  14. Brunetti, G., et al., 1989, Anni novanta. Cosa cambia dell’industria veneta, Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  15. Buckley, P.J., Casson, M., 1976, The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Buckley, P.J., Casson, M., 1985, The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Buckley, P.J., Dunning, J.H., 1976, “The Industrial Structure of US Investment in the UK,” Journal of International Business Studies, 2, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
  18. Camagni, R., Tiberi, P., 1981, “Il commercio orizzontale rivisitato: una interpretazione stocastica interregionale,” in Camagni, R. (a cura di), Il commercio orizzontale. Stato della teoria e verifiche empiriche, Padova: Cooperativa libraria editrice.Google Scholar
  19. Cantwell, J.A., 1989, Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporation, Oxford: Basic Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Cantwell, J.A., Sanna Randaccio, F., 1990, “Gli effetti dell’attività multinazionale delle grandi imprese: una verifica econometrica,” Economia e Politica Industriale, 66, pp. 105–132.Google Scholar
  21. Casson, M., 1982, “Transaction Costs and the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise,” in Rugman, A.M. (ed.), New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  22. Cavusgil, S.T., 1980, “On the Internationalization Process of Firms,” European Research, 8, pp. 273–281.Google Scholar
  23. Cavusgil, S.T., 1984, “Organizational Characteristics Associated with Export Activity,” Journal of Management Studies, 21, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  24. Cnel, 1989, Italia multinazionale, Milano: Edizioni II Sole 24 Ore.Google Scholar
  25. Committed, M., Palmisani, F., 1989, “Il processo di internazionalizzazione dell’economia italiana,” in Battaglia, A., Valcamonici, R. (eds.), Nella competizione globale, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  26. Cozzi, G., Vaccà, S., 1986, “Esiste dawero il consumatore universale?,” Economia e Politica Industrial, 52, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  27. Cozzi, G., Vaccà, S., 1989, “Consumo e tecnologia nel capitalismo contemporaneo,” Il Ponte, gennaio–febbraio, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar
  28. Decouflé, A.-C., 1972, “Firmes multinationales et prospectivesdu systeme international,” Analyse e Prevision, 5.Google Scholar
  29. Denis, J.E., Depelteau, D., 1985, “Market knowledge, diversification and export expansion,” Journal of International Management, 16, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
  30. Di Bernardo, B., 1989, “La rete del capitalismo flessibile: oltre la dicotomia gerarchia-mercato,” Economia e Politica Industrial, 64.Google Scholar
  31. Di Bernardo, B., Rullani, E., 1990, Il management e le macchine. Teoria evolutiva dell’Impresa, Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
  32. Dichtl, E., Leibold, M., Koglmayr, H.G., Muller, S., 1984, “The Export Decision of Small and Medium-Sized Firms: A Review,” Journal of International Management, 24, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar
  33. Dos Santos, T., 1970, “The Structure of Dependence,” The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, LX, 2, May, pp. 231–236.Google Scholar
  34. Dunning, J.H., 1981, International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Flowers, E.B., 1976, “Oligopolistic Reactions in European and Canadian Direct Investment in the United States,” Journal of International Business Studies, 1, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  36. Forsgren, M., Johanson, J. (eds.), 1991, Managing Networks in International Business, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Graham, E.M., 1978, “Transatlantic Investment by Multinational Firms: A Rivalistic Phenomenon?,” Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 1, pp. 82–99.Google Scholar
  38. Graham, E.M., 1985, “Intra-industry Direct Foreign Investment, Market Structure, Firm Rivalry and Technological Performance,” in Erdilek, A. (ed.), Multinationals as Mutual Invaders: Intra-Industry Direct Foreign Investment, London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  39. Grandinetti, R., Rullani, E., 1992, “Internazionalizzazione e piccole imprese: elogio della varietà”, Small Business, 3, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
  40. Hägg, J., Johanson, J., 1982, Företag i nätverk (Firms in Networks), Stockholm: SNS.Google Scholar
  41. Hirsch, S., 1967, Location of Industry and International Competitiveness, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hirsch, S., 1974, “Hypothesis Regarding Trade Between Developing and Industrial Countries,” in Giersch, H. (ed.), The International Division of Labor, Tubingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  43. Hobbing, E., 1971, “The World Corporation: A Catalytic Agent?,” Columbia Journal of World Business, July–August.Google Scholar
  44. Hornell, E., Vahlne, J.E., 1986, Multinationals: The Swedish Case, London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  45. Hymer, S., 1970, “The Efficiency (Contradictions) of Multinational Corporation,” The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, LX, 2, May, pp. 441–448.Google Scholar
  46. Hymer, S., 1974, Le imprese multinazionali, materiali raccolti da G. Luciani, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  47. Hymer, S., 1976, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press, [posthumous. Original edition 1960.]Google Scholar
  48. Hymer, S., Rowthorn, R., 1970, “Multinational Corporations and International Oligopoly: The Non-American Challenge,” in Kindleberger, C.P. (ed.), The International Corporation, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Johanson, J., Mattsson, L.G., 1992, “Network Positions and Strategic Action. An Analytical Framework,” in Axelson, B., Easton, G. (eds.), Industrial Networks. A New View of Reality, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Johanson, J., Vahlne, J.-E., 1977, “The Internationalization Process of the Firm. A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment,” Journal of International Business Studies, 1, Spring/Summer, pp. 23–32.Google Scholar
  51. Johanson, J., Vahlne, J.-E., 1990, “The Mechanism of Internationalization,” International Marketing Review, 4, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
  52. Johanson, J., Wiedersheim-Paul, F., 1975, “The Internationalization of the Firm. Four Swedish Cases,” Journal of Management Studies, October, pp. 305–322.Google Scholar
  53. Karsten, C.F., 1965, “Should Europe Restrict U.S. Investments?,” Harvard Business Review, 5, September–October, pp. 53–61.Google Scholar
  54. Kindleberger, C.P., 1969, American Business Abroad. Six Lectures on Direct Investment, New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Knickerbocker, F.T., 1973, Oligopolistic Reactions and Multinational Enterprise, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  56. Kojima, K., 1973, “A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, June.Google Scholar
  57. Kojima, K., 1977, The Theory of Direct Investment, Tokyo: Diamond.Google Scholar
  58. Kojima, K., 1978, Direct Foreign Investment. A Japanese Model of Multinational Business Operations, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  59. Lall, S., 1980, “Monopolistic Advantages and Foreign Involvement by U.S. Manufacturing Industry,” Oxford Economic Papers, 1, pp. 102–122.Google Scholar
  60. Levitt, T., 1983, “The Globalization of Markets,” Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp. 92–102.Google Scholar
  61. Lomi, A., 1991, Reti organizzative. Teoria, tecnica e applicazioni, Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
  62. Lomi, A., 1992, “L’organizzazione a rete nella teoria organizzativa,” in Lorenzoni, G. (a cura di), Accordi, reti e vantaggio competitivo, Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
  63. Lomi, A., Lorenzoni, G., 1992, “Impresa guida e organizzazione a rete,” in Lorenzoni, G. (a cura di), Accordi, reti e vantaggio competitivo, Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
  64. Lorenzoni, G., 1987, “Costellazioni di imprese e processi di sviluppo,” Sviluppo e organizzazione, 102, pp. 59–72.Google Scholar
  65. Lorenzoni, G., 1990, L’architettura di sviluppo delle imprese minori, Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
  66. Lorenzoni, G. (a cura di), 1992, Accordi, reti e vantaggio competitive), Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
  67. Luostarinen, R., 1980, Internationalization of the Firm, Helsinki: The Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar
  68. Malaussena de Perno, J.L., 1971, “Stratégic des grandes firmes et conditions de la croissance généralisée. Premiers elements pour une théorie de l’oligopole international,” Economie et Societes, 6.Google Scholar
  69. McManus, J., 1971, “La théorie de Fentreprise multinationale,” L’Actualité Economique, 4.Google Scholar
  70. Momigliano, F., 1983, “Innovazione tecnologica, commercio internazionale e investimenti diretti: vecchi e nuovi problemi di teoria e di ricerca empirica,” in Momigliano, F., Dosi, G. (a cura di), Tecnologia e organizzazione industriale internazionale, Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
  71. Momigliano, F., Balcet, G., 1983, “Nuove forme di investimento internazionale e teoria del coinvolgimento estero deirimpresa,” Economia e Politica Industriale, 36, pp. 35–68.Google Scholar
  72. Momigliano, F., Balcet, G., 1984, “Nuove tendenze nei processi di internazionalizzazione: recenti sviluppi del dibattito sulla differenziazione dei modelli di comportamenti delle imprese multinazionali e su vecchie e nuove forme di coinvolgimento estero delle imprese,” in Internazionalizzazione dell’industrial nuove forme e problemi aperti, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  73. Motta, M., 1989, “Comportamenti strategici di acquisizione di vantaggi negli investimenti all’estero: un approccio dinamico,” Economia e Politica Industriale, 61, pp. 165–194.Google Scholar
  74. Onida, F., 1981, “Commercio orizzontale, specializzazione e despecializzazione: una sfida aperta per la teoria dei costi comparati,” in Camagni, R. (a cura di), Il commercio orizzontale. Stato del la teoria e verifiche empiriche, Padova: Cooperativa libraria editrice.Google Scholar
  75. Onida, F., 1984, Economia degli scambi internazionali, Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
  76. Onida, F. (a cura di), 1989, Specializzazione e integrazione internazionale dell’industria italiana, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  77. Onida, F., Viesti, G., 1986, “Crescita internazionale e cooperazione fra imprese: un’analisi sulle imprese multinazionali italiane,” Communicazione alia XXVII Riunione Scientiflca Annuale della Società Italiana degli Economisti, Roma, 6–7 novembre 1986.Google Scholar
  78. Onida, F., Viesti, G., 1988, The Italian Multinationals, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  79. Ozawa, T., 1979, “International Investment and Industrial Structure: New Theoretical Implications from the Japanese Experience,” Oxford Economic Papers, 31, 1 March, pp. 82–89.Google Scholar
  80. Ozawa, T., 1982, Japan’s “Revealed Preferences” for the “New Forms” of Investment: A Stock-Taking Assessment, Paris: Oecd Development Centre.Google Scholar
  81. Ozawa, T., 1989, “Europe 1992 and Japan as Investment Partners: A Mutually Complementary Stage of Interaction and Alliances,” paper presented at the EC/UNCTC Meeting on TNCs and 1992, Bruxelles, July.Google Scholar
  82. Perlmutter, H.V., 1965, “L’entreprise internationale. Trois conceptions,” Revue Economique et Sociale, 2, pp. 151–165.Google Scholar
  83. Porter, M.E., 1987, “From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
  84. Porter, M.E., 1989, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, it. transl. Il vantaggio competitivo delle nazioni, 1991, Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
  85. R&P (a cura di), 1987, Italia multinazionale. L’internazionalizzazione dell’Industria italiana, Milano: Edizioni II Sole 24 Ore.Google Scholar
  86. Reid, S.D., 1981, “The Decision-Maker and Export Entry and Expansion,” Journal of International Business Studies, 1.Google Scholar
  87. Robinson, R., 1961, The Motivation and Flow of Private Foreign Investments, Menlo Park: Stanford Research Institute.Google Scholar
  88. Robinson, R., 1967, International Management, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  89. Rowthorn, R., Hymer, S., 1971, International Big Business 1957–67. A Study of Comparative Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Rugman, A.M., 1981, Inside the Multinational, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  91. Rugman, A.M. (ed.), 1982, New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  92. Rugman, A.M., 1985, “Internalization Is Still a General Theory of Foreign Direct Investment,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 3, pp. 570–575.Google Scholar
  93. Rullani, E., 1973, Lo sviluppo multinazionale delle imprese industriali, Milano: Etas Kompass.Google Scholar
  94. Rullani, E., 1978, “Struttura di gruppo e teoria dell’impresa,” in Mosconi, A., Rullani, E. (eds.), Il gruppo nello sviluppo delVimpresa industriale, Milano: Isedi.Google Scholar
  95. Rullani, E., 1989, “Economia delle reti. I linguaggi come mezzi di produzione,” Economia e Politica Industriale, 64, pp. 125–164.Google Scholar
  96. Rullani, E., 1992, “Divisione del lavoro e reti di impresa: il governo della complessita,” in Belussi, F. (a cura di), Nuovi modelli d’impresa, gerarchie organizzative e imprese rete, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  97. Schonberger, R.J., 1982, Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  98. Schonberger, R.J., 1986, World Class Manufacturing. The Lessons of Simplicity Applied, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  99. Scott, W.G., 1983, L’internazionallizzazione dell’impresa minore, Milano: Mediocredito Lombardo.Google Scholar
  100. Servan-Schreiber, J.J., 1968, La sfida americana, Milano: Etas Kompass (ed. or., 1967).Google Scholar
  101. Silvestrelli, S., 1979, Lo sviluppo industriale delle imprese produttrici di mobili in Italia, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  102. Sweezy, P.M., Magdoff, H., 1969, “Note sulla societa azionaria multinazionale,” Monthly Review, Edizione Italiana, 11, novembre.Google Scholar
  103. Teece, D.J., 1981, “The Multinational Enterprise: Market Failure and Market Power Considerations,” Sloan Management Review, 3, September, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  104. Tiberi Vipraio, P., 1987, Le nuove forme di internazionalizzazione come scelte ottimali nelle strategic di impresa,” Economia e Politica Industriale, 55, pp. 233–252.Google Scholar
  105. Tiberi Vipraio, P., 1992, “An Evolutionary Approach to International Expansion: A Study for an Italian Region,” Working Papers in Economics, n. 172, The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  106. Vaccà, S., 1986, “L’economia delle relazioni tra imprese: dall’espansione dimensionale allo sviluppo per reti esterne,” Economia e politica industriale, 51, pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
  107. Vaccà, S., Rullani, E., 1983, “Oltre il modello classico di impresa multinazionale,” Finanza, Marketing e Produzione, 1–2, pp. 133–174 and 139–160.Google Scholar
  108. Varaldo, R. (a cura di), 1979, Ristrutturazioni industriali e rapporti tra imprese, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  109. Varaldo, R., 1987, “Competizione globale e marketing internazionale,” L’impresa, 2, pp. 38–45.Google Scholar
  110. Varaldo, R. (a cura di), 1988, Il sistema delle imprese calzaturiere: struttura e strategie competitive, Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  111. Vernon, R., 1966, “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, pp. 190–207.Google Scholar
  112. Vernon, R., 1979, “The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar
  113. Walker, W.B., 1979, Industrial Innovation and International Trading Performance, Greenwich, CT.: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  114. Watkins Report, 1970, Foreign Ownership and the Structure of Canadian Industry, Task Force on the Structure of Canadian Industry, Privy Council Office, Ottawa, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
  115. Wiedersheim-Paul, F., Holson, H.C., Welch, L.S., 1978, “Pre-Export Activity: The First Step in Internationalization,” Journal of International Business Studies, 1.Google Scholar
  116. Wolf, D.R., 1970, “Modern Imperialism: The View from the Metropolis,” The American Economic Review, 2, May, pp. 225–230.Google Scholar
  117. Zanfei, A., 1985, “Cambiamento tecnologico e strategie di internazionalizzazione delle imprese tessili italiane,” Economia e Politica Industriale, 46 and 47.Google Scholar

References

  1. Allen, T., 1966, “Performance of Information Channels in the Transfer of Technology,” Industrial Management Review, 8, pp. 87–98.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K., 1974, The Limits of Organization, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K., 1979, “The Economics of Information,” in Dertouzos, M., Moses, J. (eds.), The Computer Age: a Twenty-Year View, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 306–317.Google Scholar
  4. Czepiel, J., 1979, “Communication Networks and Innovation in Industrial Communities,” in Baker, M. (ed.), Industrial Innovation. Technology, Policy, Diffusion, London: Macmillan, pp. 399–416.Google Scholar
  5. Gold, B., 1980, “On the Adoption of Technological Innovations in Industry: Superficial Models and Complex Decision Processes,” Omega, 8,5, pp. 505–516.Google Scholar
  6. Hirshleifer, J., Riley, J., 1979, “The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information — An Expository Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, 17,4, pp. 1375–1421.Google Scholar
  7. Lamberton, D. (ed.), 1971, Economics of Information and Knowledge, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Lamberton, D. (ed.), 1974, “The Information Revolution,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 412.Google Scholar
  9. Lamberton, D., 1984, “The Economics of Information and Organization,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 19, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  10. Leibenstein, H., 1966, “Allocative Efficiency versus X-Efficiency,” American Economic Review, 56,3, pp. 392–415.Google Scholar
  11. Machlup, F., 1958, An Economic Review of the Patent System, Studies of the U.S. Patent System 15, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights, USGPO.Google Scholar
  12. Machlup, F., 1962, The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Porat, M., 1977, The Information Economy, Washington, D.C.: Office of Telecommunications, U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  14. Rogers, E., 1982, “Information Exchange and Technological Information,” in Sahal, D. (ed.), The Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge, Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books, pp. 1051–123.Google Scholar
  15. Spence, A., 1974, “An Economist’s View of Information,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 9, pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
  16. Stiglitz, J., 1974, Information and Economic Analysis, Technical Report 155, Stanford: Stanford University Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  17. Teece, D., 1977, “Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how,” Economic Journal, 87, pp. 242–261.Google Scholar
  18. Utterback, J., 1974, “Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology,” Science, 183, pp. 620–626.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enzo Rullani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations