Advertisement

Strategy, Change, and the Strategic Approach: Making Sense in Process

  • Luca Zan
  • Stefano Zambon

Abstract

As in many social sciences, the concepts of strategy and strategic change are widely and increasingly used in management studies, giving rise to a specialized subarea of research generally and generically referred to as strategic management.

Keywords

Strategic Management Management Study Strategic Approach Corporate Strategy Strategic Management Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abell, D.F., 1980, Defining the Business, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P.F., 1982, “Marketing, Strategic Planning and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Marketing, 46,2, pp. 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, K.R., 1971, The Concept of Corporate Strategy, New York: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google Scholar
  4. Ansoff, H.I., 1965, Corporate Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C., Schon, D., 1978, Organizational Learning, Reading, MA.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Astley, W.G., 1984, “Subjectivity, Sophistry and Symbolism in Management Science,” Journal of Management Studies, 21,3, pp. 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Astley, W.G., Van de Ven A.H., 1983, “Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, pp. 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Axelrod, R., 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  9. Bottiroli, G., 1987, Interpretazione e strategia, Milano: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
  10. Bourgeois, L.J. III, 1980, “Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration,” Academy of Management Review, 5,1, pp. 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourgeois, L.J. III, 1984, “Strategic Management and Determinism,” Academy of Management Review, 9,1, pp. 586–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bower, J.L., Doz, Y., 1979, “Strategy Formulation, A Social and Political View,” in Schendel, D., Hofer, C. (eds.), Strategic Management, Little Brown, Boston, pp. 152–166.Google Scholar
  13. Brambilla, F., 1986, “Inseguendo la ricerca di invarianze nel mondo socioeconomico,” working paper, Dipartimento di Metodi Quantitativi, Universita L. Bocconi, Milano.Google Scholar
  14. Brunsson, N., 1982, “The Irrationality of Action and Action Rationality: Decisions, Ideologies and Organizational Actions,” Journal of Management Studies, 19,1, pp. 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burgelman, R.A., 1983, “A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy,” Academy of Management Review, 8,1, pp. 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caves, R.E., Porter, M.E., 1977, “From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, pp. 241–261.Google Scholar
  17. Chandler, A., 1962, Strategy and Structure, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Child, J., 1972, “Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: the Role of Strategic Choice,” Sociology, 6, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P., 1972, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17,1, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crozier, M., 1963, Le phenomene bureaucratique, Paris: Edition du Seuil.Google Scholar
  21. Crozier, M., Friedberg, E., 1977, L’acteur et le systeme. Les contraintes de Vaction collective, Paris: Edition du Seuil.Google Scholar
  22. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 1st ed., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Day, G., Wensley, R., 1983, “Marketing Theory with a Strategic Orientation,” Journal of Marketing, 47,4, pp. 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Dominicis, U., 1957, “La ragioneria di fronte a taluni problemi economici attuali,” Inaugural Lecture to Academic Year 1956–57, University of Cagliari, Cagliari: Tipografia P. Valdes.Google Scholar
  25. Detienne, M., Vernant, J.P., 1974, Les ruses de l’intelligence—La mètis des Grecs, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  26. De Vecchi, N., 1990, “La scuola Viennese di economia,” in Beccatini, G. (a cura di), II pensiero economico: temi, problemi e scuole, Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
  27. Di Bernardo, B., Rullani, E., 1986, “Strategia: concetto complesso o scatola vuota?,” Finanza, Marketing, Produzione, IV,4, pp. 37–75.Google Scholar
  28. Dore, R., 1987, Taking Japan Seriously. A Confucian Perspective on Leading Economic Issues, London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dosi G., Orsenigo, L., 1988, “Coordination and Transformation: An Overview of Structures, Behaviors and Change in Evolutionary Environments,” in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silveberg, G., Soete, L. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
  30. Eichner, A.S., (ed.), 1983, Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science, London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  31. Faccipieri, S., 1986, “Economia aziendale ed economia industriale: separazione di ambiti disciplinari o circolazione di concetti?,” Economia e Politica Industriale, 52, pp. 39–54.Google Scholar
  32. Freeman, J., Boeker, W., 1984, “The Ecological Analysis of Business Strategy,” California Management Review, XXVI,3, pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
  33. Foa, V., 1991, Il Cavallo e la Torre, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  34. Gagliardi, P., 1986, “The Creation of Change of Organizational Cultures: A Conceptual Framework,” Organization Studies, 7,2, pp. 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Galbraith, J.R., Nathanson, D., 1978, Strategy Implementation: the Role of Structure and Process, St. Paul: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  36. Giannessi, E., 1980, Le aziende di produzione originaria, Vol. 1: Le aziende agricole, Pisa: Cursi.Google Scholar
  37. Glassman, R.B., 1973, “Persistence and Loose Coupling in Living Systems,” Behavioral Science, 18, pp. 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goffman, E., 1969, Strategic Interaction, Philadelphia: Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  39. Hayek, F.A. von, 1973, Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order, London: Routlegde & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Hickling, A., 1974, Managing Decisions: the Strategic Choice Approach, London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Hicks, J., 1979, Causality in Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Hofer, Ch.W., Schendel, D., 1978, Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, St. Paul: West Publ. Co.Google Scholar
  43. Hopwood, A., 1992, “Accounting Calculation and the Shifting Sphere of the Economic,” European Accounting Review, 1,1, pp. 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hrebiniak, L.G., 1981, “The Organization and Environment Research Programme. Overview and Critique,” in Van de Ven, A.H., Joyce, W.F. (eds.), Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Isabella, L.A., 1990, “Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events,” Academy of Management Journal, 1, pp. 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. James, W., 1907/1974, Pragmatism and Four Essays from the Meaning of Truth, New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  47. Jeminson, D.B., 1981, “The Importance of an Integrative Approach to Strategic Management,” Academy of Management Review, 6,4, pp. 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson, C., 1982, MITI and the Japanese Miracle, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Johnson, G., 1987, Strategic Change and the Management Process, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., 1984, Exploring Corporate Strategy, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Kimberly, J.R., Miles, R.H., 1980, The Organizational Life Cycle, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publ.Google Scholar
  52. Knights, D., Morgan, G., 1991, “Strategic Discourse and Subjectivity: Towards a Critical Analysis of Corporate Strategy in Organizations,” Organization Studies, 12,2, pp. 251–273.Google Scholar
  53. Langlois, R.N. (ed.), 1986, Economics as a Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lindblom, C.E., 1959, “The Science of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review, 19, pp. 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Littlechild, S.C., 1986, “Three Types of Market Process,” in Langlois, R.N. (ed.), Economics as a Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Loasby, B.J., 1976, Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.Google Scholar
  57. Loasby, B.J., 1989, The Mind and Method of the Economist, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  58. Lorange, P., 1980, Corporate Planning, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Mansfield, R., 1986, Company Strategy and Organizational Design, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  60. March, J.G., Olsen, J., 1976, Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  61. March, J.G., Simon, H.D., 1958, Organizations, New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Marengo, L., Vivarelli, M., 1990, “Una riflessione sulla teoria evoluzionista: microfondazioni e aggregazione macroeconomica,” Economia e Politica Industrial, 67, September, pp. 189–203.Google Scholar
  63. McGee, J., Thomas, H. (eds.), 1986, Strategic Management Research. A European Perspective, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  64. Mead, G.H. 1934, Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., 1984, “Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame,” California Management Review, XXVI,3, pp. 10–28.Google Scholar
  66. Miller, D., 1981, “Toward a New Contingency Approach: the Search for Organizational Gestalts,” Journal of Management Studies, 18,1, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mintzberg, H., 1978, “Patterns in Strategy Formation,” Management Science, 24,9, pp. 934–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mintzberg, H., 1981, “What Is Planning Anyway?,” Strategic Management Journal, 2, pp. 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mintzberg, H., 1990, “The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp. 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mintzberg, H., Waters, J.A., 1985, “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent,” Strategic Management Journal, 6, pp. 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mintzberg, H., Waters, J. A., 1990, “Does Decision Get in the Way?,” Organization Studies, 11,1, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Morin, E., 1977, La Methode. I. La Nature de la Nature, Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  73. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Normann, R., 1977, Management for Growth, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  75. O’Driscoll, G.P., 1986, “Competition as a Process: A Law and Economics Perspective,” in Langlois, R.N. (ed.), Economics as a Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Orton, J.D., Weick, K.E., 1990, “Loosely Coupled System: a Reconceptualization,” Academy of Management Review, 15,2, pp. 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pennings, J. (ed.), 1985, Organizational Strategy and Change, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publ.Google Scholar
  78. Peters, T., 1988, “Facing Up to the Need for a Management Revolution,” California Management Review, Winter, pp. 7–38.Google Scholar
  79. Peters, T.J., Waterman, R., 1982, In Search of Excellence, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  80. Pettigrew, A.M., 1973, The Politics of Organizational Decision Making, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  81. Pettigrew, A.M., 1979, “On Studying Organizational Cultures,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp. 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pettigrew, A.M., 1985, The Awakening Giant. Continuity and Change in ICI, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  83. Pettigrew, A.M. (ed.), 1987, The Management of Strategic Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  84. Pettigrew, A.M., 1990, “Studying Strategic Choice and Strategic Change,” Organization Studies, 11,1, pp. 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G., 1974, “Organizational Decision-Making as a Political Process: The Case of a University Budget,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, pp. 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Porter, M., 1980, Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  87. Porter, M., 1981, “The Contributions of Industrial Organization to Strategic Management,” Academy of Management Review, 6, pp. 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Richardson, G.B., 1972, “The Organization of Industry,” The Economic Journal, September, pp. 883–896.Google Scholar
  89. Rispoli, M., 1982, “Some Considerations on Strategic Management and the Theory of the Firm,” Economia Aziendale, 1,2, pp. 169–184.Google Scholar
  90. Rullani, E., 1986, “Economia delle transazioni e informazioni: saggio sulla nuova teoria economica deH’organizzazione,” Annali di Storia dell’Impresa, 2, Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  91. Rumelt, R.P., 1984, “Toward a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” in Lamb, R.B. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 556–570.Google Scholar
  92. Shackle, G.L.S., 1972, Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Shackle, G.L.S., 1988, “Il mio schema generale di studioso,” in Kregel, J.A. (a cura di), Il mestiere di economista, Torino: Einaudi, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
  94. Simon, H.A., 1947, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  95. Simon, H.A., 1979, “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations,” American Economic Review, September, pp. 493–513.Google Scholar
  96. Teece, D.J., 1984, “Economic Analysis and Strategic Management,” California Management Review, XXVI,3, pp. 87–110.Google Scholar
  97. Van de Ven, A.H., 1979, Review of Aldrich’s (1979) book — Organization and Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp. 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Van de Ven, A.H., Astley, W.G., 1981, “Mapping the Field to Create a Dynamic Perspective on Organization Design and Behavior,” in Van de Ven, A.H., Joyce, W.F. (eds.), Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  99. Venkatraman, N., Camillus, J.C., 1984, “Exploring the Concept of Fit in Strategic Management,” Academy of Management Review, 9,3, pp. 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Weick, K.E., 1976, “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Weick, K.E., 1977, “Enactment Processes in Organizations,” in Staw, B.M., Salancik, G.B. (eds.), New Directions in Organizational Behavior, Chicago: St. Clair Press, pp. 267–300.Google Scholar
  102. Wensley, R., 1985, “Strategy as Maintaining a Viable Organizational Entity in a Competitive Market,” in Gardner, D., Thomas, H. (eds.), Strategic Marketing and Strategic Management, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 413–429.Google Scholar
  103. Whitley, R., 1984, “The Fragmented State of Management Studies: Reasons and Consequences,” Journal of Management Studies, 21,3, pp. 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Whitley, R., 1987, “Taking Firms Seriously as Economic Actors: Towards a Sociology of Firm Behavior,” Organization Studies, 8,2, pp. 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Williamson, O., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  106. Williamson, O., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  107. Zamagni, S., 1980, “Causalita e Economia: a proposito di un saggio di J. Hicks,” Note Economiche, 3, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  108. Zamagni, S., 1982a, “Sui fondamenti metodologici della scuola austriaca,” Note Economiche, pp. 63–93.Google Scholar
  109. Zamagni, S. (a cura di), 1982b, Saggi di filosofia della scienza economica, Roma: NIS.Google Scholar
  110. Zambon, S., Zan, L., 1990, “Accounting Relativism: the Unstable Relationship Between Income Measurement and Theories of the Firm,” working paper, University of Venice.Google Scholar
  111. Zan, L., 1990, “Looking for Theories in Strategy Studies,” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 6,2, pp. 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zan, S., 1988, “Introduzione,” in Zan S. (a cura di), Logiche di azione organizzativa, Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
  113. Zappa, G., 1957, Le produzioni nell’economia delle imprese, Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

References

  1. Andrews, K.R., 1971, The Concept of Corporate Strategy, New York: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google Scholar
  2. Ansoff, H.I., 1965, Corporate Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Ghemawat, P., 1991, Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hendry, C., Arthur, M.B., Jones, A.M., 1992, “Adaptation and Resource Management in the Small-Medium Firm,” working paper, Centre for Corporate Strategy and Change, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  5. Kirzner, I.M., 1992, The meaning of market process, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Lippman, S.A., Rumelt, R.P., 1982, “Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences In Efficiency Under Competition,” Bell Journal of Economics, 13, pp. 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Loasby, B.J., 1992, Equilibrium and Evolution, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mahoney, J.T., Pandian, J.R., 1992, “The Resource-Based View within the Conversation of Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson, R.R., 1991, “Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does It Matter?,” Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Special Issue), pp. 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D., Teece, D.J., 1991, “Strategic Management and Economics,” Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Special Issue), pp. 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schumpeter, J., 1950, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper (first published 1942).Google Scholar
  13. Wernerfelt, B., 1984, “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Zan
  • Stefano Zambon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations