Unmanaging Relationships and Innovation
Information and expertise become outdated faster than fashion trends these days in our current knowledge-intensive environment. Consequently, today people are valued more and more for their abilities not only to learn, but also to quickly unlearn and relearn. A shared-access context helps individuals and teams to do that far better than any configuration of a controlled-access system. I’m convinced that shared-access systems are the most productive organizational environments for riding the waves of rapid and erratic change so common in our twenty-first century.
At the end of Chap. 4 we explored the differences between two diametrically opposed macro organizational ecologies – the controlled-access and shared-access systems. In this chapter, we’ll explore a general framework for developing and maintaining shared-access contexts as a means to more fully engage the people who work in them.
KeywordsTacit Knowledge Virtual Network Complex Adaptive System Individual Autonomy Small Group Size
- Block, P. (2008) Community: The Structure of Belonging. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
- Cacioppo, J. T. and Patrick, W. (2008) Lonliness. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
- Cash, J. I., Earl, M. E. and Morison, R. (2008) “Teaming Up to Crack Innovation Enterprise Integration.” Harvard Business Review, November, pp. 90–100.Google Scholar
- Dunbar, R. (1996) Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Ehin, C. (2005) Hidden Assets: Harnessing the Power of Informal Networks. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gaba, V. and Meyer, A. D. (2008) “Crossing the Organizational Species Barrier: How Venture Capital Practices Infiltrated the Information Technology Sector.” The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 51, Nr. 5, pp. 976–998.Google Scholar
- Gleick, J. (1988) Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Goleman, D. and Boyatzis, R. (2008) “Social Intelligence and the Biology of Leadership.” Harvard Business Review, September, pp. 74–81.Google Scholar
- Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D. and Shaw, P. (2000) Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tierney, J. (2008) “As Barriers Disappear, Some Gender Gaps Widen.” The New York Times, September 9, p. F1.Google Scholar
- Waldrop, M. M. (1992) Complexity. New York: Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar
- Watts, D. J. (2003) Six Degrees. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar