Advertisement

Extreme EXPeditionary Architecture

  • Erik Seedhouse
Part of the Springer Praxis Books book series (PRAXIS)

Abstract

In his time, Roald Amundsen was first and foremost remembered as a master of planning and executing the classic polar expedition. Although Amundsen’s expeditions were undertaken almost a century ago, Exploration Class missions to Mars and beyond will more closely resemble sea voyages undertaken by explorers such as Amundsen than the mission architectures used for the Space Shuttle and International Space Station (ISS). The first voyagers to Mars will spend up to six months getting there, almost two years exploring the surface and up to six months on the return journey. To maximize their two-year stay on the surface it will be necessary for Mars crews to adopt the strategies employed by Amundsen and his fellow polar explorers, the most important of which will be mobility. In common with early polar exploration expeditions, the key to accomplishing the many scientific and exploration objectives on the Martian surface will lie in adaptable and mobile exploration architecture. Such an architecture, known as Extreme EXPedi- tionary Architecture (EXP-Arch), was conceived and developed by a small team of designers, engineers and scientists working for the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC).

Keywords

International Space Station Hermit Crab Solar Array Martian Atmosphere Exploration Objective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mjolsness, E., and Tavormina, A. The Synergy of Biology, Intelligent Systems and Space Exploration. IEEE Intelligent Systems 15 (2): 20–25. 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NASA. NASA’s Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS). From http:// www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/news/ESAS_report.html 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saleh, J.H.; Hastings, D.E.; and Newman, D.J. Flexibility in System design and Implications for Aerospace Systems. Acta Astronautica. Vol. 53, pp. 927–944, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thakoor, S. 1st NASA/JPL Workshop on Biomorphic Explorers for Future Missions. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory Auditorium. 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109. August 19–20, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Thakoor, S.; Miralles, C; Martin, T.; Kahn, R.; Zurek, R. Cooperative Mission Concepts Using Biomorphic Explorers. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109. Lunar and Planetary Science XXX. 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Wang, Y.; Zhao, D. Effect of Fabric Structures on the Mechanical Properties of 3-D Textile Composites. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 35 (3): 239–256. 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Praxis Publishing Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Seedhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.MiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations