Impacts of Exurban Development on Water Quality
This chapter details the impacts of exurban development on water quantity and quality in the United States. The chapter begins by reviewing studies that document the consequences of urbanization on water quality, with emphasis on exurban development. We show how watersheds are contaminated by a range of organic and inorganic compounds as land use along the rural-to-urban gradient intensifies. These studies indicate the need to evaluate anticipated land-use changes carefully so that watershed conservation is improved. The chapter then describes the use of modeling methods that link land-use change with watershed conservation. A case study of California’s Russian River Basin demonstrates the use of coupled land-use impact/land-use change models as decision-support tools that enable assessment of future land-use change, including exurban land development.
KeywordsFecal Coliform Watershed Manager Good Management Practice Residential Density Septic System
We thank Shane Feirer for assistance on GIS maps and Dave Newburn for his contributions to the Russian River case study and land-use change modeling.
- American Water Works Association. 1999. Manual of Water Supply Practices – M48: Waterborne Pathogens. Denver, CO: American Water Works Association.Google Scholar
- Azimer, J., and Stone, L. 2003. The Rural West: Diversity and Dilemma. Calgary, Alberta: Canada West Foundation.Google Scholar
- Caraco, N. F., and Cole, J. J. 1999. Human impact on nitrate export: An analysis using major world rivers. Ambio 28:167–170.Google Scholar
- Chang, M. F. Roth, A., and Hunt, E. V. 1982. Sediment Production Under Various Forest-site Conditions. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences.Google Scholar
- Doyle, M. P., and Erickson, M. C. 2006. Closing the door on the fecal coliform assay. Microbe 1:162–163.Google Scholar
- Dubost, F. 1998. De la maison de campagne à la résidence secondaire. In L’autre Maison: la ‘Résidence Secondaire’, Refuge des Générations, ed. F. Dubost, pp. 10–37, Paris, France: Éditions.Google Scholar
- Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Embrey, S. S., and Runkle, D. L. 2006. Microbial Quality of the Nation’s Groundwater Resources, 1993–2004. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey Report 2006–5290.Google Scholar
- Gilliom, R. J., Barbash, J. E., Crawford, C. G., Hamilton, P. A., Martin, J. D., Nakagaki, N., Nowell, L. H., Scott, J. C., Stackelberg, P. E., Thelin, G. P., and Wolock, D. M. 2007. The Quality of Our Nation's Water – Pesticides in the Nation’s Streams and Ground Water, 1992–2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
- Grantham., T., Christian-Smith, J., Kondolf, G. M., and Scheuer, S. 2008. A Fresh Perspective for Managing Water in California: Insights from Applying the European Water Framework Directive to the Russian River. Berkeley, CA: University of California Water Resources Center, available at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/wrc/contributions/208/. Accessed October 15, 2008.
- Groffman, P. M., Law, N. L., Belt, K. T., Band. L. E., and Fisher, G. T. 2004. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems 7:393–403.Google Scholar
- Heimlich, R. E., and Anderson, W. D. 2001. Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Washington, D.C.: Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
- Hopkins, L. D., and Zapata, M. A. 2007. Engaging the Future. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
- Howarth, R. W., Billen, G., Swaney, D., Townsend, A., Jaworski, N., Lajtha, K., Downing, J. A., Elmgren, R., Caraco, N., Jordan, T., Berendse, F., Freney, J., Kudeyarov, V., Murdoch, P., and Zhao-liang, Z. 1996. Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry 35:181–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., and Buxton, H. T. 2002. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999–2000: A national reconnaissance. Environmental Science and Technology 36:1201–1211.Google Scholar
- Lohse, K. A., Newburn, D. A., Opperman, J. J., and Merenlender, A. M. 2008. Forecasting the relative impacts of land use on fine sediment in anadromous fish habitat to guide development and conservation programs. Ecological Applications 18(2):467–482.Google Scholar
- Mahler, B. J., and Van Metre, P. C. 2006. Trends in metals in urban and reference lake sediments across the United States, 1970 to 2001. Environmental Science and Technology 25:1698–1709.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. R., and Miller, S. M. O. 2007. Contaminated Rivers: A Geomorphological-Geochemical Approach to Site Assessment and Remediation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Mueller, D. K., and Spahr, N. E. 2006. Nutrients in Streams and Rivers Across the Nation—1992–2001. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5107.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. 2004. Confronting the Nation's Water Problems: The Role of Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Newburn, D. A., and Berck, P. 2006. Modeling suburban and rural residential development beyond the urban fringe. Land Economics 82:481–499.Google Scholar
- Nilsson, C., J. Pizzuto, E., Moglen, G. E., Palmer, M. A., Stanley, E. H., Bockstael, N. E., and Thompson, L. C. 2003. Ecological forecasting and the urbanization of stream ecosystems: challenges for economists, hydrologists, geomorphologists, and ecologists. Ecosystems 6:659–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peterson, G. D., Beard, T. D., Beisner, B. E., Bennet, E. M., Carpenter, S. R., Cumming, G. S., Dent, C. L., and Havlicek, T. D. 2003. Assessing future ecosystem services a case study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin. Conservation Ecology 7, online. Available at: http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art1/. Accessed November 18, 2008.
- Sorensen, J. A., Glass, G. E., Schimdt, K. W., Huber, J. K., and Rapp, G. R. 1990. Airborne mercury deposition and watershed characteristics in relation to mercury concentrations in water, sediment plankton, and fish of eighty northern Minnesota lakes. Environmental Science and Technology 24:1716–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- US EPA. 1997. The Incidence and Severity of Sediment Contamination in Surface Waters of the United States. Washington, D. C.: EPA-823-R-97-006.Google Scholar
- US EPA. 2000. The National Water Quality Inventory: 2000 Report to Congress. Washington, D.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- Waters, T. F. 1995. Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects and Controls. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. 2008. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Links to Health: Facts and Figures, updated November 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar