Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss how data were collected and analyzed, and we briefly describe some results, which will be more fully explored in later chapters. We summarize student work on fundamental problems and note how this work led to exceptional growth in the students’ mathematical understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An evolving analytical model for understanding the development of mathematical thinking using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematical traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573–604.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maher, C.A., Uptegrove, E.B. (2010). Methodology. In: Maher, C., Powell, A., Uptegrove, E. (eds) Combinatorics and Reasoning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98132-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98132-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98131-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-98132-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)